четверг, 2 июня 2022 г.

In the face of persistent uncertainties. Global Economic Outlook 2022–2024

 


Note: This annual three-year economic outlook was completed in the early stages of the Russian military actions in Ukraine. These events have superimposed additional layers of uncertainty on economic prospects, especially in the medium term. In this analysis, we aim to decipher some of the potential trajectories for the economy in these uncertain times but will update the assessment at mid-year to factor in the latest developments.

Executive summary

Russian military actions in Ukraine have transformed the world. In both geopolitical and economic terms, the conflict marks a historic inflection point—yet the ultimate outcome remains highly volatile and uncertain. We anticipate the conflict will result in an array of both direct and second-order effects. Sanctions are severely hitting the Russian economy, disrupting financial flows, causing the value of the ruble to plummet, and sparking a banking crisis. At the global level, oil and gas prices have reached their highest levels since the 1970s and wheat prices are surpassing highs predating the First World War. This commodity volatility is feeding into the global economy, with fuel and food prices hitting consumers and exacerbating inflation that was already running at 40-year highs prior to the onset of the conflict. As Russia and Ukraine produce roughly 10 percent of all traded foodstuff, the disruptions to food supply and production will have a significant impact. Wheat and vegetable oil supplies will be strained, yielding higher costs, and disruptions to supplies of fertilizer will impact future crop yields.

The implications of the military actions in Ukraine have already been made plain in the projections for overall global output. Days before the start of the conflict, we were anticipating baseline global output growth of 4.0 percent in the year ahead—a decline from the striking 6.0 percent growth the world experienced in 2021 but strong nonetheless. At the time of this writing, just a few weeks later, we now anticipate baseline growth of 3.4 percent, shaving off the equivalent of nearly $480 billion in projected global output for 2022 alone. We then anticipate growth will continue to slow—to 3.2 percent in both 2023 and 2024. And, crucially, this is simply our baseline projection. As our scenario analysis explores, much hinges on the duration and trajectory of the conflict. The outcome of what happens in Ukraine, along with a confluence of other factors, will dramatically impact the size and nature of the global economy by 2024.

While what happens in Russia and Ukraine has the potential to reshape the global operating environment, it is far from the only factor at play. The Omicron variant appears to be receding in most major economies at the time of this writing, but the threat of pandemic disruptions remains. Lest we forget, it was roughly one year ago that the rapid development of effective vaccines and therapeutics and ongoing vaccination programs indicated that the pandemic might soon be a thing of the past. The experiences of Delta, followed by Omicron, have since suggested that such optimism was premature.

Although the outlook has changed since the onset of COVID-19 and the Russian military actions in Ukraine, some of the key pre-pandemic features of the global economy remain. The first of these is the divergence of growth across regions. The Asia and Australasia region was the principal source of economic dynamism before the pandemic. It is again now. Second, many of the national economies that were driving the global economy before COVID-19 have reemerged as leaders. Before the pandemic, India and China were enjoying significant economic expansion. The same holds true now, though output rates for both economies are comparatively less impressive. Our baseline projections suggest their three-year outlooks will average 6.6 and 5.2 percent growth, respectively. Although the United States will expand at a comparatively slower average rate of 2.4 percent over the next three years, this is still faster than its pre-pandemic rate of 2.3 percent in 2019. It will also remain the world’s largest economy through 2024 and serve as a major engine of global growth throughout the forecast period.

Of course, much has changed, and much is still changing. The prevailing uncertainties—ranging from a sharp rise in geopolitical risk to the acute short-term and longer-range macroeconomic unknowns—are nothing short of staggering. All this makes a three-year forecast of this nature nearly impossible. As a result, we have superimposed a scenario framework on our analysis. The goal is to develop alternative visions of the future that are both plausible and compelling.

Embedded in this scenario framework are five factors that individually and together will go a long way in determining how the short- to medium-term economic future will unfold:

The course of the conflict in Ukraine. A short or protracted conflict? Occupation or withdrawal? At the time of this writing, the Russian military action in Ukraine is still under way but is already having ripple effects for international security and the global economy. As extensive sanctions and countersanctions are being imposed and the risk of escalation remains, the total costs of this conflict—in human and economic terms—could be extraordinary.

The trajectory of COVID-19. Is a full recovery from the pandemic even possible? The emergence of the Delta, Omicron, and now BA.2 variants certainly cast a long shadow on this assumption. Therefore, the question arises: What would an endemic COVID-19 mean for the economic outlook and, indeed, for society at large? And what might the emergence of other new menacing variants mean?

The rate of supply chain recovery. The combination of high consumer demand and pandemic-driven worker attrition for manufacturers and suppliers is proving extremely disruptive. When will this situation improve? Or should we be thinking in entirely different terms?

The extent to which inflation is persistent or transitory (or both). Already-high levels of inflation have been exacerbated by the conflict in Ukraine. Interest rate rises may well reduce (or reduce rises in) the rapid increases in inflation, but risk creating drags on the stock market and reducing investments overall, which will slow growth.

US–China relations. Trade war and hostile rhetoric, a reversion to traditional bilateral trade patterns, or somewhere in between? Sino-American relations will shape both the short-term and longer-range global economic outlook and the very structure of the global economy.

To understand the range of these competing futures for the global economy and the different ways in which permutations of these five factors could unfold and interact, our Global Economic Outlook 2022–2024 explores four distinct alternative scenarios:

The Great Stagnation

The world struggles to get back on track from the disruptions brought about by COVID-19 while the conflict in Ukraine proves to be protracted. US–China relations deteriorate to unprecedented lows. Amid persistent supply chain disruptions (exacerbated by extensive global sanctions), high commodity prices, and record inflation, growth falls well below baseline projections, averaging 2.0 percent over the forecast period.

A World Transformed

The global economy undergoes sizable changes as a result of the pandemic and the return of great power geopolitics. Concerted efforts are made to reshore manufacturing and shorten supply chains, reshaping business models and fundamentally remaking global value chains. While these changes are not without growing pains and as projected growth falls short of baseline levels, averaging 2.7 percent over the forecast period, there are indications by 2024 that recovery is fast approaching.

Powering Through

The global economy rebounds despite continuing pandemic challenges and a tenuous cessation of hostilities in Ukraine. Key allied governments recommit to trade liberalization and strengthening supply chains even while geopolitical tensions simmer, especially between Washington, D.C., and Beijing. Growth is above baseline levels, averaging 3.8 percent over the forecast period, but some indicators point toward a fragile recovery.

The Great Recovery

The global economic rebound is swift and pronounced as the pandemic recedes in the wake of Omicron and violence rapidly de-escalates in Ukraine. The combination of recovery, a resurgence of global trade, and a decline in geopolitical tensions all contribute to stronger-than-expected economic growth. Growth averages 4.2 percent over the forecast period.

These scenarios, of course, are not predictions. Rather, they are plausible alternative futures against which leaders must now plan. Putting risk preparedness plans in place to account for global economic shifts will be essential. In addition, companies with a strategic mindset will build on lessons learned during the pandemic and stay proactive in pursuing and achieving future objectives—from strengthening their supply chains to executing new mergers and acquisitions and acquiring new talent. Companies that lean into the opportunities created by uncertainty—while building the capacity to make swift adjustments as the operating environment changes—will gain an outsized advantage.

Where are we now?

Despite the setbacks caused by the Delta and Omicron variants, 2021 was a year of economic recovery. Global economic output rounded out to 6.0 percent in 2021, representing a significant rebound from a 3.4 percent contraction in 2020. While we expected growth to slow in 2022, the conflict in Ukraine and Omicron-related lockdowns in the first three months of the year have curbed our projections even more. We now anticipate global output of 3.4 percent this year, down from a forecast of 4.0 percent in early February and from the 4.8 percent annual growth we projected in late September, pre-Omicron. Growth will drop further to 3.2 percent in both 2023 and 2024 (see figure 1).



To be sure, the beginning of the year has set back expectations of recovery. Stock markets in advanced economies have dropped, in some cases precipitously, as a result of the dislocations generated by the enduring pandemic and the conflict in Ukraine. Compounding this challenge, the great shortage of supplies and workers and rising inflationary pressures in key economies are persisting, at least in the short term. As forced quarantines and school closures have resulted in more workers, especially women, leaving their jobs, global unemployment is projected to hover at 5.7 percent this year, declining slightly to 5.3 and 5.0 percent in the next two years, respectively. In addition, the Russian military activity in Ukraine is the latest indicator of the return of great power geopolitics and a profound source of uncertainty for the global economy.

Given these headwinds, how will the global economy change in the next three years? The outlook is mixed. The duration and extent of the conflict in Ukraine remains a major wildcard, and the risk of another COVID variant causing more economic disruption remains. And ongoing structural issues could slow growth even more.

Inflation will rise in the early stages of 2022 on the back of strong consumer demand, rising oil and gas prices, and continuing supply chain troubles. Current projections suggest this situation will stabilize, but not until the latter half of 2023, as supply chain issues improve and central banks take action, namely by raising interest rates (see figure 2). The US Federal Reserve, for example, already raised interest rates in mid-March 2022, and is poised to continue increasing them. And in the UK, the Bank of England raised interest rates for the third consecutive time in March. We expect the combination of the higher cost of capital, surging commodities prices, and obstinate supply chain challenges, which are also likely to endure through 2022, to put downward pressure on economic growth for the duration of our three-year forecast period.



Regional and country-level projections

Our regional analysis finds that Asia and Australasia will continue to lead the world in output over the next three years, averaging 4.6 percent growth (see figure 3). India and China will lead growth in Asia, with respective average growth rates of 6.6 and 5.2 percent between 2022 and 2024. India’s growth will be driven by improvements to credit and, in turn, investment and consumption as the financial sector strengthens. China’s growth is expected to fall to 4.8 percent this year—still robust, but a notable decline from 8.8 percent in 2021. Weakness in construction and property sales, along with the potential for new lockdowns, are key contributors to this decline. Further, China’s “COVID zero” policy appears to be increasing the country’s dependence on exports, making it more vulnerable to shifts in tariffs and trade policy.



The Americas along with the Europe and Eurasia regions are projected to have comparatively lower output over the next three years, with respective average growth rates of just 2.4 and 2.1 percent. Owing to continuing labor and supply shortages, we project the three-year average growth rate in the United States to be just 2.4 percent, in line with the corresponding regional average, with growth projected to fall from 3.2 percent in 2022 before leveling off at 2.0 percent in each of the next two years. Despite these modest growth projections, the United States is still expected to power much of the post-pandemic economic recovery and will remain the world’s largest economy throughout the forecast period. Canada will see similar patterns in growth levels, falling from 3.9 percent in 2022 to 2.5 and 1.9 percent in 2023 and 2024, respectively. Though the country’s labor markets have largely recovered from the pandemic, productivity is still a concern.

In Europe, the continued economic uncertainties surrounding the conflict taking place in Ukraine will dampen the region’s economic outlook for the foreseeable future, especially as commodity prices are likely to remain high, at least in the short term. The United Kingdom is projected to see growth drop from 3.8 percent in 2022 to 1.8 percent in 2023 and 2.1 percent in 2024. Output projections for Germany have also declined since late February, with growth now estimated at 2.1 percent in 2022 (down from 3.5 percent previously). German growth is anticipated to then rise to 3.2 percent in 2023 before declining to 2.3 percent in 2024 as the economy continues to confront supply chain disruptions and fallout from the crisis in Ukraine. Without question, however, the Russian economy is experiencing the most dramatic headwinds as sanctions take effect. In February, Russia was projected to grow at 3.2 percent in 2022, followed by 2.9 and 2.0 percent growth in the subsequent two years, averaging 2.7 percent growth over the forecast period. As of this writing, the outlook has dimmed dramatically. The Russian economy is now projected to contract 10.3 percent in 2022. In 2023, the economy will continue to contract at 3.4 percent, before returning to low growth of 2.1 percent in 2024. The country will average -3.9 percent over the forecast period.

The Middle East and Africa will have a healthy growth rate of 3.4 percent between 2022 and 2024. Fueling the Middle East’s dynamism will be a continued COVID-19 vaccination rollout across the region to counter potential upcoming waves of infections along with high energy prices and rising oil production. The United Arab Emirates is projecting strong average growth of 5.4 percent over the next three years, bolstered by institutional reforms to promote trade and investment and improve the ease of doing business in the country. Within Africa, there will be some bright spots as debt levels remain stable. Nigeria has seen notable growth in cultural industries, including music, film, and fashion, even while growth in the country’s large oil sector has slowed. Nevertheless, continued slow vaccine rollouts and the potential for extreme weather events will weigh on the region’s recovery.

Five factors to watch

Over the next three years, a few factors could have an outsized impact on the direction of the global economy. Although a large constellation of forces is shaping the economic outlook, we believe these five elements will bound the possibilities for which leaders should prepare:

The Ukrainian conflict. In addition to the human cost, the conflict in Europe has major implications for the global economy, and much uncertainty remains around its duration and outcome. Already, prices of major commodities, including oil, gas, and wheat, are surging in large part due to the conflict, exacerbating already-high levels of inflation. Costly sanctions have been imposed on Russia, taking a toll on the country and the global economy overall. The risk of escalation remains high, including the potential for unprecedented cyberattacks targeting governments and businesses alike. Second-order effects could also be significant. Ukraine is the world’s fifth-largest wheat exporter, serving many already food-insecure nations from Lebanon to Bangladesh. Soaring food prices or roadblocks for wheat exports could easily increase global hunger and result in political unrest elsewhere in the world.

Lasting COVID. There is a growing consensus that COVID is here to stay. But what will that mean for the economy and, indeed, for society at large? That all depends on the virulence of new variants as well as how governments, businesses, and workers decide to address them. A more transmissible, less deadly variant may be good news from a health standpoint, but its economic toll could still be high. Frequent labor absences, as the Omicron variant has made painfully clear, reduce productivity and hinder growth.

Supply chain recovery. At present and for the foreseeable future, supply chain dislocations are creating a profound drag on the global economy and are being complicated by the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Rising consumer demand post-Omicron will intensify these challenges. As manufacturers and suppliers continue to see worker absences and attrition, orders simply cannot be filled. When will this situation improve? Predictions range from late 2022 or early 2023 to even later. Until the great shortage ends, global growth will face continued headwinds. The key question, therefore, is how long it will take supply chain systems to normalize.

Level of inflation. While inflation may ultimately prove to be transitory, its impacts are far from it. Consumers are suffering as prices reach 40-year highs, and surging oil and gas prices are set to exacerbate this challenge. Perception will be one key factor in how long this high inflation lasts. If there is a widespread perception that inflation will remain high, workers will demand higher wages, and businesses will in turn pass along their higher costs to their customers. And the extent to which monetary policy in major economies is adjusted remains uncertain. Early indications suggest interest rate rises are imminent, which may well reduce inflation while also creating drags on the stock market and reducing investments overall, slowing growth.

US–China relations. Growing tensions between Beijing and Washington—whether as a result of geopolitical rivalry, trade tensions, or territorial disputes—have significant economic implications. They have weakened the global responses to COVID-19 and climate change and show little sign of improving. How relations unfold over the next few years will shape the global economic outlook and the architecture of the global economy. Will free trade regain momentum? Or will the global economy be increasingly defined by protectionism and economic spheres of influence?

Where might we be going?

In our scenarios, we discuss four plausible yet divergent paths that the global economy could take over the next three years. While these are not predictions, they represent futures that could come to fruition—depending on how the five factors above unfold. Two primary drivers form the architecture of these scenarios, each selected because of their high impact, high uncertainty, and mutual independence from one another (see figure 4). The first, the level of global openness, measures the extent of localization in the world, ranging from modest localization requirements to more dramatic levels of protectionism. The second, the level of pandemic recovery/global hostilities, measures the extent to which the world can move beyond the pandemic and current geopolitical hostilities, ranging from a swift end to both in 2022 to a protracted crisis on both fronts, including new variants and escalating conflict.



By exploring the four alternate visions that emerge across these different driver permutations, it is possible to identify a plausible range of potential futures. In addition, by using econometric modeling, we have quantified the impact of each scenario on global and regional growth. Although baseline projections suggest global growth will average 3.3 percent over the forecast period, our analysis finds that this number could range from as low as 2.0 percent to as high as 4.2 percent, depending on how capably the world can navigate these core drivers and factors through 2024 (see figure 5).


Our scenario analysis suggests that key indicators such as unemployment rates, exports, and private consumption will also vary dramatically depending on the future that unfolds (see figure 6). Unemployment rates range from an average of 4.7 percent between 2022 and 2024 in our best-case scenario to 5.8 in our worst-case scenario. And the export growth rate ranges from a three-year average high of 6.8 percent in the Great Recovery scenario to a meager 1.0 percent in the Great Stagnation. Finally, private consumption reaches a three-year best-case average growth rate of 4.7 percent compared with 2.7 percent in the worst case. The stakes are clear across a range of economic indicators and will have a major bearing on the broader business operating environment.


Scenario 1: The Great Recovery

Sustained public health/reduced hostilities; a more open world and less localization

In the Great Recovery, the global economic rebound is swift and pronounced following a rapid de-escalation of geopolitical tensions and a receding pandemic (see figure 7). The global economy reaches 4.6 percent output in 2022 and maintains 3.2 percent output over the subsequent two years. Successful negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv result in a cessation of hostilities and Russia’s decision to reverse course and pull back troops from Ukraine in 2022. The risks of the conflict escalating in and beyond Ukraine appear, at least in the short term, to have been diminished.




Alongside these geopolitical shifts, COVID-19 becomes endemic. The virus becomes more manageable thanks to a combination of improved treatment capabilities, vaccine dissemination and uptake, advances in therapeutics, and improved global cooperation in confronting the crisis. The result of this development, alongside the cessation of violence in Europe, is a cascade of tailwinds for the global economy. Consumer spending rises as confidence grows that economic shutdowns and labor-force disruptions are firmly in the rearview mirror.

The supply chain dislocations that defined much of 2021 and 2022 also steadily disappear amid the broad-based economic recovery. Companies apply lessons learned from the experience of the disruption to strengthen their logistics, making them more robust in the face of future shocks. Inflation persists to some degree amid high growth but is less disruptive as supply chains stabilize and supply-demand balances are restored. Expansionary monetary policies in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere are no longer being deployed.

Trade flows recover in this environment, particularly as both Beijing and Washington step back from the confrontational rhetoric that defined their relations in recent years. Talk of trade wars fades. Other developments take longer than expected to stabilize on the world stage. In addition to lingering inflation, labor costs remain high, and competition for talent remains fierce. Nevertheless, a recovering global economy built on strengthening trade flows suggests that the economic outlook is normalizing after years of pandemic disruption.

Scenario 2: Powering Through

Persistent pandemic/rising hostilities; a more open world and less localization

In Powering Through, the global economy rebounds despite persistent pandemic challenges and a tenuous peace in Ukraine (see figure 8). The economy reaches and maintains 3.7 percent growth in 2022, before rising to 4.1 percent in 2023 and then falling again to 3.6 percent in 2024. Although Russian and Ukrainian leaders reach a truce to stop active fighting in 2022, neither side is fully satisfied with the terms. Lower levels of violence continue to erupt intermittently in the years that follow but fall short of the scale witnessed in the first weeks of the conflict. Some sanctions are lifted to encourage de-escalation, and the commodities prices slowly fall with them.




While new COVID variants continue to emerge and spread throughout the world, they tend to be less deadly, resulting in fewer shutdowns and supply chain disruptions. Several economies move to jumpstart growth despite the lingering pandemic through policies to promote the free flow of labor, goods, and services. Intermittent supply chain disruptions still occur but generally improve from the severe disruptions of 2021.

In tandem, falling commodity prices amid increased trade and moderate consumer demand serve to bring inflation down from its peak in Q2 2022. Labor and other input costs fall for businesses, but significant vulnerabilities in the global economy remain unaddressed. The risk of US–China economic decoupling is rising as geopolitical tensions between the two countries escalate while protectionist sentiments continue to simmer under the surface in major economies and threaten to boil over in unprecedented fashion. And the risk that Russia may reignite a major—and more widespread—conflict in Europe remains. The global economy is powering through a slow pandemic recovery, but geopolitical volatility is rising, and questions remain as to how long the present course can be sustained.

Scenario 3: The Great Stagnation

Persistent pandemic/rising hostilities; less open world and more localization

In the Great Stagnation, the world struggles to get back on track from the disruptions brought about by COVID-19 and the economic effects of the conflict in Ukraine (see figure 9). Growth falls to 2.3 percent in 2022 and drops to 1.8 percent in 2023 before recovering slightly to 2.0 percent in 2024. The pandemic persists to varying degrees in countries around the world, with intermittent waves of outbreaks brought about by new variants. These developments sometimes result in new lockdowns and supply chain disruptions, creating a Groundhog Day sensation and an overall atmosphere of economic pessimism.




Efforts to bolster domestic self-sufficiency by shortening supply chains and building up domestic capacity in key industries soon transform into outright protectionism in an atmosphere of growing geopolitical volatility and populist backlash against trade and all things foreign. These developments take place against a backdrop of increasingly hostile rhetoric between the United States and China and in the aftermath of full-scale military action in Ukraine. Beyond a significant human cost, the conflict in Europe has ripple effects that extend beyond the continent, including spikes in oil, gas, and food prices that drive persistent inflation despite weak economic growth amid sanctions, countersanctions, and unprecedented waves of cyberattacks targeting governments and major businesses alike. While the fighting has largely been contained to Ukraine, the risks of an expanded conflict persist. Global trade and FDI flows decline, as does the free flow of labor.

Actions to foster economic growth with expansionary monetary policies in key economies succeed in increasing consumer demand but have the downside effect of compounding inflation, particularly when supply chain disruptions reoccur. While economists note that a cyclical recovery could be on the horizon, these sources of strain have combined to take a perilous toll on the global economy by 2024.

Scenario 4: A World Transformed

Sustained public health/reduced hostilities; less open world and more localization

In A World Transformed, the global economy undergoes profound changes as a result of the pandemic experience and the return of great power geopolitics (see figure 10). Global output growth falls to 2.9 percent in 2022 and drops to 2.5 percent in 2023 before rebounding to 2.8 percent growth in 2024. While the acute threat of COVID-19 recedes in 2022 as herd immunity is reached in many economies following the extensive spread of the Omicron variant, the legacy of the pandemic is profound. Industrial policies and efforts to build self-sufficiency are supercharged by the experience, with leaders in major economies vowing to never again let their countries be exposed to the risks of global supply chains.




Localization is the order of the day, with governments strategically investing in vital industries and working to build capable domestic workforces. The results are uneven and painful at times, often resulting in short-term economic hardship. As supply chains are remade, there are noteworthy disruptions, and levels of trade fall overall, yielding higher costs to consumers. Yet despite these developments and slowing growth, there are reasons for optimism. Once established, shorter supply chains prove to be robust, with greater efficiencies enabled by AI and other new technologies. Inflation falls relatively quickly as consumer demand is reduced in an atmosphere of lower growth, reducing labor and input costs for businesses.

US–China relations mirror these economic shifts: both countries focus on strengthening geopolitical and economic ties in their respective regions. Bilateral trade between the two countries declines, but hostile rhetoric and the risk of overt conflict appear to be receding. Tensions between the West and Russia remain, even as the country has largely withdrawn from the international system following its costly military action in Ukraine. Strong international backlash tempered the duration of the conflict, but the geopolitical and economic effects were transformational and, in many ways, marked the end of globalization as it had been before. Overall, these geopolitical and economic shifts have been painful, and the global economy has contended with some serious blows. Nevertheless, signs of recovery in 2023 reflect some growing hope that such changes can ultimately herald a brighter economic future.

Conclusion and business implications

Uncertainty is unnerving for business leaders. But they have learned to live with it—and adapt to it—especially in the pandemic conditions of the past two years. While unpredictability will remain, understanding the above factors and scenarios can help government and business executives better anticipate and plan for the economic futures that might occur.

The five factors we identified—and how they interact with one another—have the capacity to change the global economic architecture. Therefore, putting risk preparedness plans in place to account for global economic shocks such as additional supply chain disruptions, geopolitical friction, continued inflation, and lasting COVID will be key. Building on their experiences of the past two years, companies with a strategic mindset will stay proactive in pursuing their targets, from acquiring talent to new mergers and acquisitions.

More specifically, five business implications should be top of mind:

Prioritize risk preparedness. Operational resiliency will be the name of the game for companies over the next few years. To minimize the uncertainty shrouding the global economic architecture, businesses should ensure that they have robust risk preparedness and management programs in place. This means preparing for everything from minor inconveniences such as shipping delay times to worst-case scenarios ranging from another pandemic to a major conflict.

Expect exchange rate volatility. Record-high inflation could impact exchange rates. Low inflation and interest rates helped to deter swings in exchange rates over the past decade, but as consumer prices and interest rates go up, currency volatility could make a comeback. Businesses with extensive international operations should be prepared for higher costs of doing business. To mitigate such risks, companies can encourage early payment by customers and use forward contracts, among other initiatives.

Prepare for rising interest rates. Interest-sensitive businesses, such as those in the mortgage industry, will be confronted with less demand for their goods and services. Companies can also expect to see higher borrowing costs for both operating lines and term loans. To prepare for these realities, strategic businesses will seek to reduce costs in ways that minimize harm to the bottom line. This can include several key steps, from having clear visibility on their spending to reducing consumption and even boosting automation.

Plan for endemic COVID. As the likelihood of endemic COVID grows, businesses will need to adapt. This could mean embracing permanent remote work to redesigning office spaces to reduce virus spread. Creating in-office vaccination booster programs, requiring mask wearing in offices if and when COVID becomes more seasonal, and requiring employees to stay home when ill are other initiatives that companies might take if COVID becomes a permanent fixture in our lives.

Be ready to reassess supply chains. From pushing for greater localization of manufacturing operations to boosting the use of technology to improve productivity, companies are streamlining their supply chains to alleviate product shortages and increase efficiency. Doing so will only become more urgent over the next few years as geopolitical risks and economic issues converge to create more pressure on international trade and operations.




Supply chain risk: take back control

 


How to make risk management a strategic asset and a source of competitive advantage

Over the past two years, global supply chains have been in a state of turmoil. For businesses across the economy, supply shocks and shortages have become a fact of life, and a financial headache: the cost of shipping containers on many major global trade routes has more than doubled.

With substantial supply chain risks set to remain for the foreseeable future, risk management needs to become a strategic function. Get it right and your business will gain a substantial competitive advantage.

Customers are demanding better and more transparent risk management. Their purchasing strategies are increasingly oriented toward suppliers’ ability to deliver (as well as cost).

As existing supply chains become less reliable, alternate sources are in big demand. But they are also few and far between. Key raw materials, such as lithium and magnesium, are hard to procure, while the supply base of several key sectors, such as semiconductors, is now highly concentrated.

Other risks include non-compliance with increasingly onerous trade restrictions, a lack of transparency, and a tricky transition from low-cost and just-in-time-based value chains to ones that revolve around environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. Each of these dynamics may contribute to shortages and high prices that ripple through supply chains. In some cases, businesses try to innovate their way out of trouble, but that can jeopardize their financial viability.

Risk management needs to be rethought

The market has responded to the reemergence of supply chain risk by offering a range of mapping and scoring technology/services, but many organizations fail to create sustainable competitive advantages and business cases around supply chain risk management by focusing too much on platform-driven approaches.

That is a mistake: companies that are adept at risk management will gain a competitive advantage. Trusted by customers, they are more likely to win new business. In fact, successful and transparent risk management increases the marketable quantity of end products by ensuring the ability to deliver. An important competitive differentiator in today’s world, robust risk management can justify higher prices.

It is important to recognize that a structured and systematic approach to identifying risks is now a must. Supply dynamics are too complex to be addressed ad hoc. Businesses need to take a comprehensive and fully transparent approach to risk management throughout the value chain. The organizational culture must reward the identification of risks and encourage open exchanges on this topic, while risk management should be embedded into the existing roles within the organization.

How do we approach risk management?

Drawing on our deep expertise in procurement and supply chain management, Kearney works with clients to develop a governance model to monitor the impact of risk across the organization. We aim to build a central, stringent, and cross-functional process for the systematic management of risks. Ideally, this process will be fully automated to address risks across all areas and for all customers in the best possible way.

A cognitive risk engine can be used to provide full risk transparency. If you can create a digital twin of your value chain, you can address risks throughout the entire value chain and logistics, right down to which customers are affected. Global, detailed, and real-time risk modeling, using a scalable cloud-based solution, is the best possible way to gauge risk and optimize the mitigation strategy.

But a risk management solution also needs to be flexible. To evaluate suppliers based in countries where information is difficult to obtain, a business may need to employ alternative forms of finance and risk modeling. It is important to receive this information in real time before another competitor terminates this supplier so that, in this case, a safety stock can be built up unnoticed.

How clients typically apply risk management in their supply chain

We see three supplier risk archetypes:

1. Risk seeker

Focused on regulatory compliance and mitigation of short-term risks. Risk management strategy characterized by specific risks and problematic suppliers. Uses streamlined technology diagnostic tools for identification and assessment of risk. This archetype may be first to move, but can miss quite a bit of the picture if they move forward without a robust process and governance to manage the process and act on identified risks.

2. Disruption avoider

Focused on future and buried risk, but potential disrupters take precedence. Risk management strategy characterized by broad supply chain bottlenecks including suppliers’ risk and performance, and crucial risk categories such as raw material or cyber. Uses identification of critical suppliers’ potential issues for identification and assessment of risk.

3. Strategic differentiator

Focused on risk management as a competitive advantage. Risk management strategy characterized by building strategic capability, and views risk as an input into business operation optimization. Uses strategy, process, governance, and technology for identification and assessment of risk including full digital twin of supply chain to reconfigure for resilience, and risk map as trigger for continuous management.

Additionally, the companies differentiating risk strategically as a competitive advantage encourage its strategic partners to follow Supply Chain Risk Management Standard (SCRM) culture and processes. Intellectual property and business sensitivity can prevent the level of openness desired to directly monitor supply chain risk, but if your partners can adopt the right mindset and process, you can be more comfortable with the level of risk and potential exposure.

Key questions to ask before setting out to improve the management of risk

Strategic

  • What do you want to achieve—mitigate short-term risk and secure business continuity in the coming 24 months or drive strategic decision-making?
  • Are you ready to adopt a predictive mindset to identify vulnerabilities and enable avoidance strategies?

Process

  • Are you willing to create full transparency and connect key downstream processes to risk management?
  • What performance improvements process are you willing to embed to ensure processes are self-healing and relevant?
  • Are you willing to dedicate resources to contact second- and third-tier suppliers directly and obtain more information?

Governance

  • Are you ready to make risk management a part of your main steering mechanism?
  • Will you make sure that accountabilities are embedded in roles?
  • Which key performance indicators (KPIs) will be used to incentivize risk mindset, and are they appropriate?

Technology/enablement

  • What is your ambition for transparency and automation?
  • Are your aspirations limited by existing technology and datasets?

Capabilities and culture

  • Will you come up with a clearly articulated and socialized case for change?
  • Do you have the ability to connect strategy and culture through metrics and performance management?

How to make the management of risk a source of competitive advantage

To provide guidance to our clients, Kearney has developed the risk management reference model (see figure 1).



Mindset

Understanding risk management. Make risk management a strategic function under the responsibility of the CPO with regular reporting and steering committees. It should be fully integrated along the entire value chain (R&D, purchasing/supply chain, sales).

Tone from the top. Risk management should be sponsored by the CEO, with the CPO taking technical responsibility, supported by a risk management committee consisting of relevant managers and employees from purchasing, supply chain, and R&D.

Transparency and honesty. Develop a risk management manual setting out risk management’s eight core dimensions (see below), which is accessible to the entire organization and the subject of recurring training courses and onboarding. Create an incentive model that rewards people for identifying and addressing risks, together with an organizational model that defines roles and responsibilities.

  1. Values and culture
  2. Communication and training
  3. Technical infrastructure and IT
  4. Risk management
  5. Goal setting
  6. Programs and processes
  7. Organization and control
  8. Monitoring and improvements

First line of defense

Risk identification and opportunities. Perceive risks as opportunities to gain a competitive advantage and introduce processes to identify risks. These should include:

  • Scoping: Selection of industries, categories, value creation steps for risk sensing
  • Sensing: Linking of internal (BOM—bill of materials), supplier (risks), and market (logistics) data
  • Interpreting: Transfer of the harmonized data into the respective risk dimensions
    • Dimension #1 (risk category): information security, regulations
    • Dimension #2 (components): semiconductors, batteries
    • Dimension #3 (supplier): …
  • Evaluating: Prioritization of risks using a multidimensional scoring approach
  • Planning: Development of actions to mitigate risks via cross-functional teams

Execution, steering, and monitoring. Introduce regular reporting mechanisms, such as business area-specific reviews of risks and cross-divisional review of risks, and ad hoc reporting mechanisms, such as external risk panels or a whistleblower system that can escalate and mitigate risks as appropriate. Control mechanisms could include an OBK-driven (objectives and key results) model based on a cross-functional organizational and process landscape and an internal system for monitoring the risk management process and its efficiency.

Tools and methods. Aggregate internal BOM, supplier risks, and market logistics data, while developing a fully automated and fully integrated IT solution for identifying and assessing risks, as well as tracking responsibilities and mitigation strategies.

Capabilities. Develop risk identification, mitigation, and prevention capabilities related to the technical, financial, and administrative capacity of an organization.

Continuous process improvement. Take a structured approach to identifying potential for improvement and corresponding measures, supported by a mindset of continuous improvement.

Second line of defense

Corporate risk management encompassing values and culture, goal setting, communication and training, programs and processes, technical infrastructure and IT, organization and control, risk management, and monitoring and improvement.

Legal: safeguarding buyers. Provide buyers with a defined framework for the selection of suppliers/components/raw materials, and a real-time overview of the risks via the integrated IT solution for risk management. Request that suppliers regularly fill out a questionnaire on the current risk situation and risk mitigation.

Third line of defense

Process and documentation audit, random sampling, and traceability. Develop a risk management handbook and a database that tracks risks and associated responsibilities.

What does “good risk management” look like?

In our experience, very few organizations can count themselves as leaders in risk management, nor use it to establish a competitive/business advantage. In many cases, they have assembled some pieces of the puzzle, but not all (see figure 2).



Here is a summary of what leaders will have implemented in each area of the risk management reference model:

Risk identification and opportunities. The supply chain has been modeled completely and transparently (in other words, which risks exist and which customers are exposed to these risks).

Execution, steering, monitoring. Cross-functional processes have been implemented to address risks. These will include a weekly reporting routine, structured approach, and checklist to assess risks and set up a task force. The organization will have a catalog of measures for known risks.

Tools and methods. An integrated and near real-time (less than five hours) cloud solution will collect all relevant data centrally and model risks. A risk management tool will present risks transparently along the value chain, with an interface to suppliers.

Capability setup. The organization will have the data science skills to model relationships and to create and manage IT solutions, together with cross-functional knowledge regarding industry-specific relationships, since parts are reused everywhere via platform models. The organization will have the skills to ensure process security and the mentality to identify the best possible solutions.

Continuous process improvement. After each incident, the organization will hold workshops with the process participants, possibly involving the respective suppliers and customers, and extract the potential for improvement.

Second line of defense. The buyer, supply chain manager, and risk manager will be involved in the development process with the value proposition of “Go” and “No go” component lists. If a supplier does not meet the relevant risk criteria, the buyer, supply chain manager, and risk manager will be able to exercise a veto.

Third line of defense. The organization will conduct internal and external audits on a regular basis to obtain expert opinions.

Ready to make risk management a strategic asset and a source of competitive advantage?

We understand the complexities of establishing a strategic risk management function and its implementation toward a competitive advantage. Our transformation approach ensures a comprehensive perspective with a clear business case. To talk more about your ambitions and how we can help, please contact the authors below.


суббота, 28 мая 2022 г.

What Is an Affinity Diagram?


Affinity diagram

The affinity diagram is a business tool used to organize ideas and data. It is one of the Seven Management and Planning Tools. People have been grouping data into groups based on natural relationships for thousands of years; however, the term affinity diagram was devised by Jiro Kawakita in the 1960s[1] and is sometimes referred to as the KJ Method.

The tool is commonly used within project management and allows large numbers of ideas stemming from brainstorming[2] to be sorted into groups, based on their natural relationships, for review and analysis.[3] It is also frequently used in contextual inquiry as a way to organize notes and insights from field interviews. It can also be used for organizing other freeform comments, such as open-ended survey responses, support call logs, or other qualitative data.

Process[edit]

The affinity diagram organizes ideas with following steps:

  1. Record each idea on cards or notes.
  2. Look for ideas that seem to be related.
  3. Sort cards into groups until all cards have been used.

Once the cards have been sorted into groups the team may sort large clusters into subgroups for easier management and analysis.[4] Once completed, the affinity diagram may be used to create a cause and effect diagram.[5]

In many cases, the best results tend to be achieved when the activity is completed by a cross-functional team, including key stakeholders. The process requires becoming deeply immersed in the data, which has benefits beyond the tangible deliverables.


Also called: affinity chart, affinity mapping, K-J Method, thematic analysis

The affinity diagram organizes a large number of ideas into their natural relationships. It is the organized output from a brainstorming session. Use it to generate, organize, and consolidate information related to a product, process, complex issue, or problem. After generating ideas, group them according to their affinity, or similarity. This idea creation method taps a team’s creativity and intuition. It was created in the 1960s by Japanese anthropologist Jiro Kawakita.

WHEN TO USE AN AFFINITY DIAGRAM

  • When you are confronted with many facts or ideas in apparent chaos
  • When issues seem too large and complex to grasp
  • When group consensus is necessary

Typical situations are:

  • After a brainstorming exercise
  • When analyzing verbal data, such as survey results
  • When collecting and organizing large data sets
  • When developing relationships or themes among ideas
  • When reducing attributes to categories that can be addressed at a higher level

AFFINITY DIAGRAM PROCESS

The affinity diagram process lets a group move beyond its habitual thinking and preconceived categories. This technique accesses the great knowledge and understanding residing untapped in our intuition. Affinity diagrams tend to have 40 to 60 items; however, it is not unusual to see 100 to 200 items.

Materials needed: Sticky notes or cards, marking pens, and large work surface (wall, table, or floor).

Step 1: Record each idea with a marking pen on a separate sticky note or card

(During a brainstorming session, write directly onto sticky notes or cards if you suspect you will be following the brainstorm with an affinity diagram.) Randomly spread notes on a large work surface so all notes are visible to everyone. The entire team gathers around the notes and participates in the next steps.

Tips: Use markers so words can be read clearly even from a distance. With regular pens, it is hard to read ideas from any distance. Written ideas should be between three and seven words long.

Step 2: Look for ideas that seem to be related in some way and place them side by side

Attempt to look for relationships between individual ideas and have team members simultaneously sort the ideas (without talking) into five to 10 related groupings. Repeat until all notes are grouped. It’s okay to have “loners” that don’t seem to fit a group. It is also okays to move a note someone else has already moved. If a note seems to belong in two groups, make a second note.

Tips: It is very important that no one talk during this step. The focus should be on looking for and grouping related ideas. It is also important to call these “groupings.” Do not place the notes in any order or determine categories or headings in advance.

Step 3: Begin a discussion with your team

From these relationships, attempt to define categories and create summary or header cards for each grouping or category. You can discuss the shape of the chart, any surprising patterns, and especially reasons for moving controversial notes. Make changes and move ideas around as necessary. When ideas are grouped to the team’s satisfaction, select a heading for each group. To do so, look for a note in each grouping that captures the meaning of the group. Place it at the top of the group. If there is no such note, write one. Often it is useful to write or highlight this note in a different color.

Tips: Header cards should clearly identify the common thread for all groupings and should be descriptive of that thread.

Step 4: Combine groups into "supergroups," if appropriate

Assign all ideas to the identified categories by placing ideas under header cards.

Tip: Base assignment on “gut feel,” not through contemplation.

AFFINITY DIAGRAM EXAMPLE #1

The ZZ-400 manufacturing team used an affinity diagram to organize its list of potential performance indicators. Figure 1 shows the list team members brainstormed. Because the team works a shift schedule and members could not meet to do the affinity diagram together, they modified the procedure.

Figure 1 Brainstorming for Affinity Diagram Example

The team members wrote each idea on sticky notes and placed the notes, in random order, on a rarely used door. Over several days, everyone reviewed the notes and moved the notes into related groups. Some people reviewed the evolving pattern several times. After a few days, the natural grouping shown in Figure 2 (below) had emerged.

Notice that one of the notes, "Safety," has become part of the heading for its group. The rest of the headings were added after the grouping emerged. Five broad areas of performance were identified: product quality, equipment maintenance, manufacturing cost, production volume, and safety and environmental.


Figure 2 Affinity Diagram Example

AFFINITY DIAGRAM EXAMPLE #2

The following example comes from a hospital setting. Seeking to better understand the barriers to on-time delivery of medications, the team created an affinity diagram in six steps.

  1. 1. Assigned a group leader for the activity.
  2. 2. Agreed on a statement of the issue or problem.

    Tip: Stating the problem in the form of a question (“What are the barriers to on-time delivery of medications?”) can often prove useful.

  3. 3. Brainstormed and recorded ideas.

    Tip: You have two main options for gathering ideas from team members. Participation by everyone in the group is assured with silent recording (option b, below), but traditional brainstorming can also generate ideas.

    1. Traditional brainstorming—In order around the group, each person writes an idea or response to the question on a 3” x 5” card while announcing the content of the card to the group.
    2. Silent recording—Each person writes responses on 3" x 5" cards or sticky notes, one idea per card, until all team members have exhausted their store of ideas.
  4. 4. Attached all of the cards to the wall, grouping similar ideas together. For example, the team posted together all topics that suggested that the pharmacy may be understaffed.

    Tip: After posting all ideas the first time, fine-tune the groupings by moving cards from one pile to another to reflect closer ties. Team members should talk with each other as they arrange the ideas.

  5. 5. Labeled each final grouping with a header identifying the general topic that all items in the group share. See Figure 3 (below).
  6. 6. Reviewed final groupings and headers. By walking around and examining the posted notes, all members of the group had an opportunity to see the groupings and then to comment on them.

Figure 3 Affinity Diagram On-Time Delivery of Medications

Next Steps: Making Connections to Other Tools

While an affinity diagram may present interesting data and useful ideas, the exercise itself should lead to further analysis. The team can now use a interrelationship diagram, for example, or even a cause-and-effect diagram to get to root causes for late medications.

An affinity diagram, above all, stimulates discussion about a problem or issue, opening up possibilities for improvement or solution. 

AFFINITY DIAGRAM EXAMPLE #3

Company SQBOK seeks to understand the difficulties around and excessive time needed for onboarding new employees. A team of hiring managers, new employees, human resource managers, and peer employees conducted a brainstorming session and identified 15 problems. In an affinity diagram process, all of the ideas were written down on "sticky" pages affixed to a board.

A separate group charged with managing the onboarding process was asked to identify any commonalities or relationships between the ideas. The group identified four main categories: training, paperwork, regulatory, and technology. Each idea was categorized under these general areas. Company SQBOK can now track these four areas and assign them to the appropriate groups for resolution. The process also highlights areas of deficiency.

Details of this exercise, which highlights improvement opportunities for the team, are shown in the table below.

Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Orientation is too long
Organization charts do not get updated
Citizenship establishment process is too lengthy
Badges are not returned quickly
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Orientation does not cover office hour access times
Request for parking pass should be online
Drug testing results not available prior to start
System logon access needs to be complete prior to day 1
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Classes specific to our company are too infrequently offered
I4 form difficult to understand
Computers are all different models and configurations
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Applications needed for each job are different
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Requirements for a laptop need to be identified
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Badges need access levels established prior to start
Training
Paperwork
Regulatory
Technology
Cell phone policy confusing

https://bit.ly/3LUHYtR

Affinity Diagram/Chart

Definition

The Affinity Diagram or Chart is a method for organising the information and data in a more useful and instructive way.

Explanation

Often at the beginning stages of an improvement effort, information is disorganised, ambiguous and chaotic. There are complaints and anecdotes, little data, and little of help, insufficient even to define what is the problem or need.

The affinity chart is a way to begin to bring order out of chaos. It is one of the most intuitive of the improvement methods. Constructing an affinity chart involves several stages of group activity:

  • Identifying the topic and purpose of the study.
  • Gathering information: Complaints, anecdotes, rumours, opinions and whatever relevant data and specialised knowledge exists.
  • Brainstorming whatever else may be important to this issue.
  • Placing each individual item identified in the previous two steps on its own index card or Post-it Note™.
  • Silently “group” the items.
    • Do it silently – each participant may move cards around until there is a silent consensus.
    • New cards may be written during the grouping.
    • If a group exceeds three cards, subdivide the group.
    • When the groups are completed, label the group, placing the label on a separate card. Continue the silence during this activity.
    • “Group the groups” of cards, no more than three subgroups to a group; label the groups of subgroups. Continue the silence.
  • Discuss: What has emerged? What patterns seemed to be clear? What are the implications for the work ahead?

Note: The Japanese also call the Affinity Chart the K-J Diagram and it is one of the seven management tools.

An example of an affinity chart

Theme: What is going wrong in our volunteer organisation?

Financial

Declining revenues

Eroding nest egg

Two more years worth of finances left

Leadership

Few volunteers for leadership roles

Same group every year

...

Membership

Membership getting older

Membership declining

No diversity in membership


Routine

Nothing new to do

Resistance to change

...

...

Need a purpose

We need to get out more

Do community service

Why do we exist as a group?

Material needs

Need a VCR

Need new furniture

Meeting place needs refurbishing

Esprit-needs

We need more liveliness

We need new blood

We need a spark

https://bit.ly/3LVHUua