Показаны сообщения с ярлыком product management. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком product management. Показать все сообщения

понедельник, 21 апреля 2025 г.

Product Planning: What to Do, with Whom, and When?

 


Product planning is a difficult term to define because it’s so broad and involves so many different aspects of a product manager’s job. In fact, it’s probably a much larger portion of your role as a PM than you realize.

What is Product Planning?

Product planning involves all of the internally focused decisions, steps, and tasks necessary to develop a successful product. In other words, it involves everything you’ll need to do that will affect the product itself. By contrast, go-to-market planning involves all of the external-facing steps. These are the things you’ll do to introduce and market your product to the public.

Here are a few examples of both a product plan and go-to-market plan to better understand how we see both functions.

 

Product Plan:

  • What features should we prioritize for the product’s development?
  • How will we determine the price points for our product?
  • Which vendors will we work with for manufacturing?
  • What will be our revenue targets, our goals for new-customer adoption and other metrics that we can track to determine the product’s level of success?

 

Go-to-Market Plan:

  • What email campaigns will we develop to inform prospects about our new product?
  • Which pieces of marketing collateral should we create for this product launch?
  • How and when will we train our sales force on selling the new product?
  • Should we create limited-time promotions to boost early purchases?
  • What PR campaigns will we roll out to increase industry awareness prior to launch?

 

Product Planning is Not One Meeting or a One-Time Activity

A common misconception among product owners is to think of “product planning” as just an activity, something they do once in the early stage of a product’s development. They might hold a single meeting with their stakeholders. The meeting will help to decide, for example, what major themes to prioritize, who their target customers will be, and the basic pricing structure for the product. From there, they jump straight into execution mode—never to revisit any of these big-picture strategic decisions again.

Of course, after you’ve gotten underway developing your product at any stage, the realities on the ground might change. This is why it is important to not view product planning as a one-time step in the process and as a major strategic component of the process itself.

One great thing about understanding product planning as an ongoing part of your role, as opposed to a one-time task, is that it can give you a new framework that allows you to make changes to your initial planning when those changes are strategically called for.

Let’s say at various stages of your product’s development you gain new demographic data about your primary user persona, or your customer surveys reveal new and counterintuitive information about which features to prioritize in your next release, or you bring in a new stakeholder who has insights your team hasn’t considered before. All of these scenarios might demand that you revisit the decisions you and your team made in your early-stage product planning sessions.

However, changing some of these agreed-upon priorities and decisions midway through your development can feel uncomfortable. That is why it is essential to adjust your organization’s thinking to understand that product planning is never actually finished.

 

So, here’s the bottom line around your product plan:

When you approach product planning as a one-time event, the decisions made dictate the entirety of your product’s development. It is more strategically advantageous to make decisions throughout the product development process, so that you can constantly weigh new information and new realities.

 

A Good Product Planning Strategy

Okay, so if product planning is a never-ending part of product management. If it should be woven into everything we do as product managers to help us successfully develop our products, then what should the product planning portion of our role actually look like? How should we schedule product planning? Whom should we involve, and when?

Here are a few steps to help you craft your own product planning culture.

 

1. Create an organizational culture that views product planning as an ongoing process.

For most companies, this will require a major shift in thinking, but it will be worth the effort.

You don’t want to change your core mission every other week, of course. But you also shouldn’t feel beholden to a set of strategic plans that came out of a single meeting months earlier — merely because you called that your “product planning meeting” and everyone agreed on those decisions back then.

When you can persuade your core team, your stakeholders and your organization in general that product planning must be ongoing and must leave open the ability to change direction or priorities when the facts demand it, you will ultimately be in a much better position to deliver more successful products.

 

2. Establish a culture of frequent communication throughout the product development process — not merely in the few meetings you’ve scheduled.

If you encourage your organization to adjust its thinking and to understand that product planning might require a shift in priority when the strategic realities call for it, you will want to communicate more often with your team — and to encourage more communication from them as well.

Because your early-stage decisions are not set in stone, you might be making changes to your plan at various stages throughout the process. And because your team now knows they can suggest changes as well if they have the data or insights to support them, they might also want to propose updates to your strategic plan. For these reasons, you will want to communicate more frequently across your organization to make sure everyone knows about any updates or additions to your plans.

This new frequent-communication culture might take the form of additional, short update meetings. You may also benefit from using a product roadmap tool that can automatically alert the relevant teams and individuals when you’ve made updates to the roadmap.

 

3. Summarize your research with conclusions and key takeaways — don’t data dump.

Pollsters and other political researchers often use the term “top sheet” to mean the front page of a technical and usually equation- or graph-heavy report. This top sheet is a handy summary to what’s inside that report, usually just a few bullets that any layperson can understand, such as “42% of respondents said they are concerned or highly concerned about….”

As a product manager, when you want to suggest strategic plans or goals for your product or propose strategic changes as part of the ongoing product planning we’re discussing, you’ll want to back up those changes with data. But that does not mean merely dumping volumes of research onto your team and expecting them to find your conclusions for themselves.

A good product manager will summarize the data — and present what amounts to a top sheet that clearly and quickly shows the support for your ideas. This top sheet might be the data points you are pulling from a relevant industry report. It might be a few key quotes from customers, taken from surveys or interviews you’ve conducted. The point is, you want to pull out the relevant information from your research that helps you make your point — without making your stakeholders and your team sift through the raw data and find it themselves.

At the same time, though, you will still need to provide that raw data. If you are merely dumping information in front of your core team or your stakeholders — and not supplying them with any context or conclusions around that data — you are not doing your job. Likewise, if you’re simply presenting conclusions without the supporting research, you are also falling short of your responsibility. You need to do both.

 

4. Include product planning ceremonies to make sure everyone on the team is up-to-date and, if needed, has a chance to weigh in.

If you follow the steps outlined so far, then you will avoid one of the most common pitfalls a product manager can fall into. Surprising stakeholders and key players across the company with information about the product’s development that they had no idea was taking place.

In an environment where the PMs do not communicate regularly with their teams, or share all strategic updates, large ceremonial update meetings can be risky. Some participants can feel blindsided because they are hearing items under discussion for the first time.

But when you’re treating product planning as a part of the process, and informing your team along the way of all updates and changes, you can introduce product planning ceremonies — meetings, perhaps quarterly, where you can discuss the product you have made and any big-picture strategic updates to your plan.

These product planning ceremonies can also be a great time for you and your team to discuss any open-loop strategic questions — such as priorities or plans that might need to be changed but which haven’t yet come up for discussion.

The point here is that, because you’ve shifted your company’s way of thinking, discussing a possible tweak to your product plan in a quarterly meeting like this won’t feel like a bombshell that goes against whatever your team decided several months back. It will be treated instead the way it should be — as an item that, based on new information, evidence or insights, might deserve another look because doing so might lead to a better product.


https://tinyurl.com/3cy28uy5

суббота, 15 февраля 2025 г.

Cannibalization Effect Product Cannibalization

 


Cannibalization effect is a phenomenon that occurs when a new product or service within a company’s portfolio competes with and reduces the sales and market share of its existing products or services. While it may seem counterintuitive for a business to undermine its own offerings, cannibalization can be a strategic move when managed effectively.

Introduction to Cannibalization Effect

Cannibalization effect, also known simply as “cannibalization,” refers to the situation where a company’s new product or service directly competes with its existing offerings, leading to a reduction in the sales or market share of those existing products. This phenomenon occurs when a business decides to introduce something new that appeals to its existing customer base, even if it means some of its existing products will lose sales.

Causes of Cannibalization Effect

Several factors can lead to the cannibalization effect:

  1. Innovation: The introduction of innovative products or services can render existing offerings less attractive, prompting customers to switch to the new, superior option.
  2. Market Evolution: Changes in customer preferences, market dynamics, or technological advancements may require companies to adapt and offer new solutions to remain competitive.
  3. Competitive Pressure: The presence of strong competitors in the market can force a company to innovate and release new products or services to maintain or expand its market share.
  4. Diversification: Companies often seek to diversify their product or service portfolios to reduce risks and capture a broader range of customers.

Impact of Cannibalization Effect

The cannibalization effect can have various consequences for a business:

Advantages:

  1. Innovation: Cannibalization encourages companies to innovate and introduce new products or services, ensuring they stay relevant in a rapidly changing market.
  2. Market Leadership: Embracing cannibalization can reinforce a company’s market leadership position by demonstrating its commitment to innovation and progress.
  3. Sustained Growth: The introduction of new products or services allows a company to continue growing and adapting to changing market conditions.

Disadvantages:

  1. Short-Term Revenue Loss: Cannibalization can result in a temporary decline in sales and revenue as customers switch to the new offerings.
  2. Brand Confusion: Customers may become confused or frustrated when a company offers similar products with slight variations, potentially affecting brand loyalty.
  3. Resource Allocation: Companies need to allocate resources for the development, marketing, and distribution of new products, which can be costly.
  4. Channel Conflict: Cannibalization may create conflicts within distribution channels, as retailers or distributors may struggle to allocate resources and shelf space to competing products.

Strategies for Managing Cannibalization Effect

To effectively manage the cannibalization effect, businesses can implement several strategies:

  1. Customer Segmentation: Identify distinct customer segments for existing and new products. Ensure that the new offerings cater to different customer needs or preferences.
  2. Clear Communication: Transparently communicate the benefits of new products to existing customers. Explain how the innovations address their needs or offer superior value.
  3. Gradual Transition: Implement cannibalization gradually rather than abruptly discontinuing existing products. This allows customers to adjust to the changes.
  4. Pricing Strategies: Employ pricing strategies that encourage customers to switch to new products gradually. This can include offering discounts or bundling options.
  5. Cross-Promotion: Promote new products to existing customers through cross-selling and bundling, creating synergy between the old and new offerings.
  6. Innovation Pipeline: Establish a consistent innovation pipeline to continually introduce new products and stay ahead of market changes.
  7. Monitoring and Adjustment: Monitor the performance of new products and be prepared to adjust marketing, pricing, and distribution strategies based on customer feedback and market dynamics.

Real-World Examples of Cannibalization Effect

  1. Apple Inc.: Apple has strategically employed the cannibalization effect several times. When it introduced the iPhone, it cannibalized its own iPod sales, recognizing that the iPhone’s capabilities made standalone music players less relevant. Similarly, the introduction of the iPad disrupted its laptop sales, but it opened up a new market segment for Apple.
  2. Toyota: Toyota introduced its hybrid vehicles, like the Prius, which cannibalized its own sales of traditional gasoline-powered cars. The company recognized the shift in consumer preferences toward more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles, and it embraced this change through innovation.
  3. Netflix: Netflix, originally a DVD rental service, transitioned to a streaming platform, cannibalizing its own DVD rental business. This move allowed Netflix to stay ahead in the evolving entertainment industry and cater to changing viewer habits.

Conclusion

The cannibalization effect is a complex phenomenon in business where a company’s new product or service competes with and reduces the sales and market share of its existing offerings. While it may initially lead to short-term revenue loss and brand confusion, when managed effectively, it can drive innovation, sustain growth, and maintain market leadership. By understanding its causes, impact, advantages, disadvantages, and effective management strategies, businesses can make informed decisions regarding the cannibalization effect. In a competitive business landscape, embracing well-managed cannibalization can contribute to long-term success and adaptability.


Product cannibalization is a situation where a company’s new product directly competes with and diminishes the sales and market share of its existing products. Essentially, it involves a company competing with itself by introducing a new offering that appeals to the same customer base as its existing products. While this may appear detrimental at first glance, product cannibalization can be a strategic choice made to maintain or expand a company’s overall market presence.

Causes of Product Cannibalization

Several factors can lead to product cannibalization:

  1. Innovation: The introduction of innovative products or services can make existing offerings less attractive, prompting customers to switch to the new, superior option.
  2. Market Evolution: Changes in customer preferences, market dynamics, or technological advancements may require companies to adapt and offer new solutions to remain competitive.
  3. Competitive Pressure: The presence of strong competitors in the market can force a company to innovate and release new products to maintain or expand its market share.
  4. Diversification: Companies often seek to diversify their product or service portfolios to reduce risks and capture a broader range of customers.

Impact of Product Cannibalization

Product cannibalization can have various consequences for a business:

Advantages:

  1. Innovation: Cannibalization encourages companies to innovate and introduce new products or services, ensuring they stay relevant in a rapidly changing market.
  2. Market Leadership: Embracing cannibalization can reinforce a company’s market leadership position by demonstrating its commitment to innovation and progress.
  3. Sustained Growth: The introduction of new products or services allows a company to continue growing and adapting to changing market conditions.

Disadvantages:

  1. Short-Term Revenue Loss: Cannibalization can result in a temporary decline in sales and revenue as customers switch to the new offerings.
  2. Brand Confusion: Customers may become confused or frustrated when a company offers similar products with slight variations, potentially affecting brand loyalty.
  3. Resource Allocation: Companies need to allocate resources for the development, marketing, and distribution of new products, which can be costly.
  4. Channel Conflict: Cannibalization may create conflicts within distribution channels, as retailers or distributors may struggle to allocate resources and shelf space to competing products.

Strategies for Managing Product Cannibalization

To effectively manage and leverage product cannibalization, businesses can implement several strategies:

  1. Customer Segmentation: Identify distinct customer segments for existing and new products. Ensure that the new offerings cater to different customer needs or preferences.
  2. Clear Communication: Transparently communicate the benefits of new products to existing customers. Explain how the innovations address their needs or offer superior value.
  3. Gradual Transition: Implement cannibalization gradually rather than abruptly discontinuing existing products. This allows customers to adjust to the changes.
  4. Pricing Strategies: Employ pricing strategies that encourage customers to switch to new products gradually. This can include offering discounts or bundling options.
  5. Cross-Promotion: Promote new products to existing customers through cross-selling and bundling, creating synergy between the old and new offerings.
  6. Innovation Pipeline: Establish a consistent innovation pipeline to continually introduce new products and stay ahead of market changes.
  7. Monitoring and Adjustment: Monitor the performance of new products and be prepared to adjust marketing, pricing, and distribution strategies based on customer feedback and market dynamics.

Real-World Examples of Product Cannibalization

  1. Apple Inc.: Apple has strategically employed product cannibalization several times. When it introduced the iPhone, it cannibalized its own iPod sales, recognizing that the iPhone’s capabilities made standalone music players less relevant. Similarly, the introduction of the iPad disrupted its laptop sales, but it opened up a new market segment for Apple.
  2. Toyota: Toyota introduced its hybrid vehicles, like the Prius, which cannibalized its own sales of traditional gasoline-powered cars. The company recognized the shift in consumer preferences toward more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles, and it embraced this change through innovation.
  3. Netflix: Netflix, originally a DVD rental service, transitioned to a streaming platform, cannibalizing its own DVD rental business. This move allowed Netflix to stay ahead in the evolving entertainment industry and cater to changing viewer habits.

Conclusion

Product cannibalization is a complex phenomenon in business where a company’s new product competes with and reduces the sales and market share of its existing products. While it may initially lead to short-term revenue loss and brand confusion, when managed effectively, it can drive innovation, sustain growth, and maintain market leadership. By understanding its causes, impact, advantages, disadvantages, and effective management strategies, businesses can make informed decisions regarding product cannibalization. In a competitive business landscape, embracing well-managed cannibalization can contribute to long-term success and adaptability.

By 

https://tinyurl.com/mryef4ts

четверг, 2 января 2025 г.

BCG Matrix- How To Use, Insights and Free Templates

 


The BCG Matrix was initially sketched by Alan Zakon, a senior executive at BCG, and was later refined by Bruce Henderson, the founder of BCG, in his 1970 essay The Product Portfolio.

The BCG Matrix gained widespread use during the 1970s and was adopted by many Fortune 500 companies to manage diversification.

The BCG Matrix is still widely used today, although modern business dynamics have introduced new complexities that the traditional matrix did not fully account for​.

What is the BCG Matrix?

The BCG Matrix, also known as the Growth-Share Matrix, is a strategic framework developed by the Boston Consulting Group in 1970.

It helps firms evaluate their product portfolios by categorising products into four quadrants based on market growth rate and relative market share.

The matrix offers guidance on where firms should invest, divest, or maintain, and how they can best allocate resources across their product lines.

A Guide to the BCG Matrix


Market Growth


Traditional View:
The market growth rate refers to how attractive a market is in terms of expansion opportunities.

High-growth markets offer potential for revenue growth, while low-growth markets often represent maturity or saturation.

Traditionally, companies invested heavily in high-growth markets and maintained profitability with minimal investment in low-growth markets​.

Contemporary View:
In today’s business landscape, high-growth markets are more volatile and susceptible to disruption.

Rapid technological shifts and shorter product lifecycles often complicate long-term investment strategies.

For digital sectors, growth cycles are shorter, and companies must continuously adapt to remain competitive.

Key considerations:

  • Volatility: High-growth markets are more vulnerable to economic fluctuations and technological advancements.
  • Short product lifecycles: Digital products often experience faster saturation.
  • Disruptive technologies: Technological innovations can rapidly change the market landscape​

Market Share

Traditional View:
Relative market share measures a product’s competitive strength compared to its largest rival.

Higher market share traditionally correlates with competitive advantages like economies of scale and increased profitability.

Products with low market share typically require substantial investment to become competitive​.

Contemporary View:
In today’s service-based and digital sectors, market share is not always the best measure of success.

For example, network effects, customer retention, and recurring revenue models often hold more importance than traditional market dominance.

Smaller, agile organisations can outcompete larger players by focusing on customer experience and innovation.

Key considerations:

  • Network effects: In digital industries, user engagement and network growth often outweigh traditional market share.
  • Scalability: Digital products can achieve rapid growth without high market share.
  • Recurring revenueSubscription business models focus on customer retention rather than market dominance​

The Four Sections of the BCG Matrix


BCG Matrix: Cash Cows (High Market Share, Low Growth)

Traditional View:
Cash Cows are products with high market share in low-growth or mature markets. These products generate reliable cash flow with minimal investment, as competition is limited. Firms often use profits from Cash Cows to fund investments in Stars or Question Marks​.

Contemporary Insights:
While Cash Cows continue to be valuable for maintaining financial stability, firms today also use them to drive innovation and diversify product offerings.

Markets evolve and so firms need to regularly reassess their relevance and explore incremental improvements or new customer segments.

Strategic Decisions:

  • Maximise profitability: Focus on cost-efficiency to sustain cash flow.
  • Invest in innovation: Use steady cash flow to fund innovation or enter adjacent markets.
  • Diversify product lines: Extend product offerings to maintain customer interest​.

Example: Procter & Gamble’s Pampers brand generates significant cash flow, allowing the company to invest in developing new products​.


BCG Matrix: Dogs (Low Market Share, Low Growth)

Traditional View:
Dogs are products with low market share and limited growth potential. These products often underperform financially, generating little to no profit. Traditionally, companies divested Dogs to redirect resources to more promising ventures​.

Financial Perspective:
From a financial standpoint, Dogs contribute minimally to revenue and may generate losses. Maintaining Dogs ties up capital and resources that could be better deployed elsewhere.

Companies that divest Dogs can improve profitability by reducing overhead costs and reallocating resources to higher-growth areas​.

Contemporary Insights:
Some Dogs can still offer strategic value, especially in niche markets. These products might provide customer insights, create synergies with other units, or generate steady, if modest, revenue. Firms should weigh up these benefits against the financial strain these products impose.

Strategic Decisions:

  • Divest or exit: Most Dogs should be divested to free up resources for more promising products.
  • Reposition for niche markets: Dogs may succeed in smaller, specialised markets with less competition.
  • Reduce costs: Implement cost-cutting measures to minimise the financial burden​.

Example: Apple’s iPad is now considered a Dog, yet Apple continues to produce it for a loyal customer base​.


BCG Matrix: Question Marks (Low Market Share, High Growth)

Traditional View:
Question Marks are products with low market share in high-growth markets. They require substantial investment to increase market share, with the potential to become Stars. However, if they fail to gain traction, they risk becoming Dogs​(Boston Consulting Group…).

Contemporary Insights:
In the digital economy, Question Marks face more risk due to rapid changes in consumer preferences and technology.

Firms can employ agile methodologies to test the viability of a product before fully committing resources which reduces the risk of over investing in the early stages of development.

Strategic Decisions:

  • Invest selectively: Carefully assess potential before committing significant resources to growing market share.
  • Test and iterate: Use agile approaches to validate market demand.
  • Divest early: Exit the market if growth prospects are weak​(Understanding the BCG G…)​(Boston Consulting Group…).

Example: Apple TV remains a Question Mark, with Apple investing heavily in content while competing against dominant players like Netflix​(What Is the Growth Shar…).


BCG Matrix: Stars (High Market Share, High Growth)

Traditional View:
Stars are products with high market share in high-growth markets. These products often require substantial investment to maintain their leadership positions but have the highest potential for growth. Stars are key drivers of future revenue and, as the market matures, often transition into Cash Cows​(Boston Consulting Group…).

Contemporary Insights:
In tech-driven markets, Stars face constant competition and shorter product life cycles. Companies must continuously innovate to maintain their market leadership. Agility and a deep understanding of consumer trends are essential to maintaining a Star’s status.

Strategic Decisions:

  • Sustain high investment: Continue investing in growth to maintain leadership.
  • Explore integration opportunities: Use vertical or horizontal integration to strengthen market position.
  • Prepare for market maturation: Plan for the product’s transition into a Cash Cow as the market matures​.

Example: The iPhone remains Apple’s Star, commanding high market share and driving significant revenue, while Apple invests in R&D to maintain its competitive edge​.


BCG Matrix Example

The BCG Model is based on products rather than services, however, it does apply to both. You could use this if reviewing a range of products, especially before starting to develop new products.

Looking at the British retailer, Marks & Spencer, they have a wide range of products and many different lines. We can identify every element of the BCG matrix across their ranges:

  • Stars

Example: Lingerie. M&S was known as the place for ladies underwear at a time when choice was limited. In a multi-channel environment, M&S lingerie is still the UK’s market leader with high growth and high market share.

  • Question Marks/Problem Child

Example: Food. For years M&S refused to consider food and today has over 400 Simply Food stores across the UK. Whilst not a major supermarket, M&S Simply Food has a following which demonstrates high growth and low market share.

  • Cash Cows

Example: Classic range. Low growth and high market share, the M&S Classic range has strong supporters.

  • Dogs

Example: Autograph range. A premium-priced range of men’s and women’s clothing, with low market share and low growth. Although placed in the dog category, the premium pricing means that it makes a financial contribution to the company.

Conclusion: Strategic Importance of the BCG Matrix

You can also apply the BCG model to areas other than your product strategy.

For example, I developed this matrix as an example of how a brand might evaluate its investment in various marketing channels.

The medium is different, but the strategy remains the same –  milk the cows, don’t waste money on the dogs, invest in the stars and give the question marks some experimental funds to see if they can become stars.



Whether you’re strategising for growth or assessing performance, these ready-to-use templates will help you visualise your company’s market position and make informed decisions.

https://tinyurl.com/bddffx3t