Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Industry 4.0. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком Industry 4.0. Показать все сообщения

воскресенье, 9 июня 2019 г.

Industry 4.0 - Ethics and Identity - Future of Health and Healthcare - Environmental Health and Climate Change - Oceans

The Fourth Industrial Revolution represents a fundamental change in the way we live, work, and relate to one another. It is a new chapter in human development, enabled by technology advances that are commensurate with those of the first, second and third industrial revolutions, and which are merging the physical, digital, and biological worlds in ways that create both promise and peril. The speed, breadth, and depth of this revolution is forcing us to rethink how countries should develop, how organizations create value, and even what it means to be human; it is an opportunity to help everyone, including leaders, policy-makers and people from all income groups and nations, to harness technologies in order to create an inclusive, human-centred future.

https://attachments-content-prod.contextualiq.org/5920c6e8-9928-45ca-8e98-003c30a4172c.wav




Ethics and Identity


Innovations are redefining what it means to be human
Innovation triggered by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in disciplines like biotechnology and artificial intelligence, is redefining what it means to be human by pushing the limits of lifespan, health, and cognition in ways once confined to science fiction. As knowledge progresses and new discoveries are made, a related moral and ethical discussion is critical - if people are to be able to appropriately respond to phenomena like life extension, so-called designer babies, and memory extraction. The biological domain in particular poses a range of ethical challenges when it comes to regulation and social norms. New technologies present questions about what it means to be human, what information about personal health should be shared, and what rights and responsibilities we have with regard to altering the genetic code of future generations. Many other questions are likely to arise with regard to human augmentation, and to how societies should deal with machines that have human-like qualities and an ability to autonomously make life-or-death decisions. Related privacy, data security, and identity issues are becoming increasingly important for policy-makers, regulators, and companies.
There are also growing concerns that, as the Fourth Industrial Revolution deepens our individual and collective relationships with technology, it may negatively affect social skills - like the ability to empathize. We already see this happening. A 2010 study by the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research identified a nearly 40% decline in empathy among college students compared with counterparts 20 or 30 years earlier. Most of that decline occurred after the year 2000. According to results of a study published by Nielsen in 2017, millennials in the US spend about six hours per week on social media, while members of Generation X (age 35 to 49) spend nearly seven hours. As face-to-face conversation is crowded out by online interaction, there are fears that people will begin to struggle to listen, make eye contact, or accurately read body language. To combat these challenges, there is a need to ensure that the Fourth Industrial Revolution fosters individualism and humanity, and is an empowering force that fosters technology as a tool that is made by people, and for people. Individuals and organizations need to take collective responsibility for creating a future where innovation and technology genuinely serve the public interest.
Future of Health and Healthcare

Summary

The global population will balloon from 7.6 billion to 9.7 billion by 2050, according to the United Nations - while the number of people over the age of 60 will increase to roughly 2 billion by that point. The world is currently ill-equipped to respond to these trends, and the global health system will have to undergo major transformation, and attract greater amounts of investment in disease prevention and health promotion, in order to ensure that an expanding global population can live better and longer lives.

Environmental Health and Climate Change

Air pollution and climate change are having a serious impact on global health
Nearly one quarter of all global deaths are a result of the environment, according to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 2016 report Preventing Disease Through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks. One of the greatest environmental threats to human health is air pollution. Many low- and middle-income countries do not monitor air quality, and either lack effective emission control legislation or simply fail to enforce legislation. As a result, their populations face a disproportionate disease burden. In addition to outdoor exposure to air pollution, WHO estimated in 2016 that almost 3 billion people around the world were still burning biomass fuel and coal indoors, in order to cook or to heat their homes, which resulted in more than 4 million deaths annually. In 2018, WHO estimated that more than 80% of people living in urban areas (that monitor air pollution) are exposed to air quality levels that exceed the organization’s limits - and that 97% of cities in low- and middle-income countries with more than 100,000 inhabitants do not meet WHO air quality guidelines (the figure falls to 49% for high-income countries). 
Air pollution is also a primary contributor to climate change, which has generated global health risks including changes in vector-borne disease patterns, water scarcity, food insecurity, and violence. These threats are most severe for vulnerable populations like children, the elderly, and the poor. Additional measures are needed in order to reduce exposure to air pollution and mitigate the effects of climate change, and decrease disease rates and mortality. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and the Paris Agreement on climate change, have recognized this need and provide goals and targets in order to prioritize action (though one of the world’s biggest sources of carbon emissions and pollution, the US, has announced plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement). New and expanding research disciplines, including Planetary Health (which takes into consideration all the natural systems that human health depends upon) and the collaborative approach known as One Health, have drawn increased focus to the complex, interconnected relationships between the earth’s natural systems and species. These approaches recognize that the health of humans, animals, and the environment are closely interrelated, and promise to broadly advance our understanding of environmental impacts.
Oceans
Oceans are a critically important source of nutritious food, income, inspiration, and stability. A 2017 estimate published by the consultancy BCG valued global “ocean assets” at more than $24 trillion. However, marine ecosystems face dangers that put this value at risk, like climate change, ocean warming, increased acidification, oxygen depletion, pollution, overfishing, and illegal fishing. Innovative policies, strong business leadership, and disruptive technologies will all be essential to navigate towards a cleaner and safer future.
This briefing is based on the views of a wide range of experts from the World Economic Forum’s Expert Network and is curated in partnership with Professor Douglas McCauley, Marine Biologist and Assistant Professor, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Pollution and the Oceans

The oceans have become a receptacle for the world’s pollution
The most harmful ocean pollutant is - far and away - carbon pollution. In the last decade, the oceans have absorbed nearly a third of the carbon dioxide emitted by industrial activity. This has slowed climate change, but at great cost to ocean health. When carbon dioxide is absorbed by seawater it increases acidity levels, and threatens ocean life ranging from the microscopic snails that feed salmon to the coral reefs that support tourism. Plastics are another particularly insidious form of ocean pollution; according to the non-profit Ocean Conservancy, coastal nations generate 275 million metric tons of plastic waste every year (and 8 million metric tons of plastic enters the oceans). The Ellen MacArthur Foundation and the World Economic Forum jointly predicted that there will be more plastic than fish (by weight) in the oceans by 2050, and the United Nations Environment Programme has recorded more than 817 species of ocean animal that have encountered plastic pollution. Plastic pollution has also been detected in seafood sold for human consumption; a 2015 study by a team of University of California, Davis and Hasanuddin University researchers flagged man-made debris in 25% of seafood market fish, and 67% of all species sampled in the US.
According to a report published in the journal Science Advances in 2018, only 9% of plastic waste has been recycled globally - highlighting a need to re-think design and regulation in a way that incentivizes re-use. Potential solutions include policies that curb the use of single-use plastics like bags or straws, or improving the capture of plastics that leak out of waste systems. Researchers have found that just 10 of the world’s rivers are the source of 90% of the plastic pollution entering the oceans, pointing to a possible focus for efforts to curb plastic pollution as a matter of policy and industrial reform - by stopping pollution at its source. Another major source of ocean pollution is the runoff of fertilizers used in agriculture, which are carried down rivers into oceans where they create population explosions of algae and bacteria. This in turn depletes oxygen levels, killing fish and creating inhospitable conditions for marine life. As a result, more than 400 low-oxygen “dead zones” have been documented in the oceans worldwide. The spread of these areas could be limited, in a way that also saves money for the agriculture industry, by deploying a more strategic and responsible application of fertilizers.
Mass Extinction
Ocean life is sitting on an extinction cliff As far as life on land is concerned, we are rapidly approaching what scientists have dubbed the “Sixth Mass Extinction” - as human-caused extinction rates approach levels last experienced during the era that saw the end of many dinosaur lineages. The situation in the oceans is a little brighter, for the moment. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, about 17 ocean animal extinctions have occurred in the last 500 years (during the same period, more than 500 land animal extinctions have occurred due to human activity). A 2016 report in the journal Science projected that rates of extinction in the oceans could increase dramatically, however - particularly as climate change accelerates. Ocean animals that are under threat include Monk Seals (both the Hawaiian monk seal and the Mediterranean monk seal), Blue Whales (which were depleted in the early 1900s), and all six species of sea turtle found in US waters. Without a change to business as usual in ocean management, we could therefore soon initiate an additional Sixth Mass Extinction in the oceans. An industrial revolution is beginning in the oceans, with parallels to the industrial revolutions that have taken place on land. This involves a rapid expansion of marine industries such as ocean farming, marine energy, and marine transport, and a nearly five-fold increase in the amount of ocean area being explored for deep sea mining. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, by May 2018 the International Seabed Authority had issued 29 contracts for the exploration of deep-sea mineral deposits, and more than 1.5 million square kilometres of international seabed (about the size of Mongolia) had been set aside for mineral exploration in the Pacific and Indian oceans and along the mid-Atlantic ridge. Mining in international water is expected to begin in 2025, according to the IUCN. On land, animal extinction rates began accelerating rapidly during the first two industrial revolutions, when there was much less awareness of the link between human health and the environment. Now, the oceans present an opportunity to intelligently move a marine industrial revolution forward without associated spikes in animal extinction that would compromise the oceans’ nourishing resources.
Human Well-Being and Oceans
The fates of the oceans and humanity are increasingly intertwined
The oceans are more than a beautiful home to inspiring ocean wildlife; they are a critically important source of nutritious food, income, jobs, and global stability. The oceans yield $2.5 trillion annually in goods and services, according to a “conservative” estimate published in 2017 by the consultancy BCG, making them equivalent to one of the largest single economies in the world. The oceans provide millions of jobs in fishing, aquaculture, tourism, energy, transportation, and biotechnology. The value of ocean resources is particularly important for poor countries. Fishery net exports from developing countries alone have been valued at $37 billion, or more than value of meat, tobacco, rice, and sugar exports combined, according to a report published in 2018 by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Wealthier nations are also dependent on ocean resources. The collapse of cod stocks along the east coast of Canada, for example, sparked the largest mass layoffs in the country’s history and prompted large-scale migration from affected provinces. Canada spent almost $2 billion between 1994 and 1998 on aid and recovery programs aimed at coping with this social and ecological disaster.
The oceans act as a massive refrigerator of free-range, highly nutritious food fit for human consumption. According to the FAO, fish provide more than 3.1 billion people with at least 20% of their animal protein, and serve as a critically important source of nutrients essential to good health like iron, zinc, and omega-3 fatty acids. Researchers estimate that if current trajectories for fishery decline persist, 845 million people could become at risk of diseases associated with malnutrition. Ocean health and human health intersect in other important, but sometimes less obvious ways. Fishery declines have been linked to human trafficking when, for example, child and slave labour is used to capture increasingly rare fish. Another example: some analysts suggest that piracy in Somalia and West Africa can partially be explained by disenfranchised fishermen turning to violence in order to protect decreasing offshore fish stocks. In situations where overfishing has depleted potentially lucrative species, organized crime has also escalated. In Mexico’s Sea of Cortez, for example, it is believed that drug cartels may be involved in an illicit industry that is both depleting a critically-endangered fish and threatening to trigger the extinction of the Vaquita (a small porpoise).
Aquaculture
We are shifting from being ocean hunters to ocean farmers In 2014, for the first time in history, the global population ate more farmed fish than wild fish; this was a development as transformative as our forebears’ long ago shift from hunting and gathering on land to becoming able to rely on agriculture. Aquaculture in the ocean is a booming industry. According to a report published in 2018 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, global aquaculture production excluding plants increased by roughly 30% between 2011 and 2016, to 80 million tonnes. Production of finfish alone during 2016 was valued at $138.5 billion, according to the FAO report. While growth has been geographically diverse, the vast majority is currently centred in Asia. China alone represents more than 60% of global aquaculture production. The industry’s expansion could help meet a growing global demand for food from animal sources that may increase by 80% by 2050 - fuelled by global population growth, and by increasing amounts of wealth in developing countries. Aquaculture could play an important role in promoting global food security. But there are challenges involved in keeping the nutritious products produced in lower-income nations within domestic markets, where they can help fight malnutrition and undernutrition; that’s because farmed seafood like shrimp is now often exported from developing to developed nations. In addition, just like farming on land, farming in the ocean can be environmentally destructive. While proponents of aquaculture note that it can take pressure off of frequently-overfished wild stocks, the negative effects of aquaculture include pollution, the harvesting of at-risk wild fish to feed farmed fish, and the destruction of wild fish nursery grounds (like mangrove forests) in order to build fish farms. Innovation could better enable more responsible fish farming, particularly as an increasingly crowded and protein-hungry world looks to the oceans for nourishment. The challenge will be to make ocean aquaculture something that can successfully meet food shortfalls - without also inflicting damage on ecosystems.
Climate Change Impacts
Oceans are extremely vulnerable in the face of climate change
The oceans are being hit hard by climate change. Effects include ocean warming, ocean acidification, and oxygen depletion. A future ocean that is hotter, more acidic, and a more difficult place for ocean life to breathe presents serious challenges. The oceans have absorbed more than 90% of the heat produced via greenhouse gas-associated warming since the 1970s - and according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the five warmest years on record have all occurred since 2010. Ocean life is largely accustomed to stable temperatures, and is vulnerable to related changes. Coral reefs, for example, which can house millions of species, are being bleached from overheating. Back-to-back extreme ocean heat waves in 2016 and 2017 caused massive bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef off the coast of Australia, killing half of its coral. Potential related economic impacts, not to mention environmental impacts, are significant - a 2013 Deloitte study found that the Great Barrier Reef was generating about $7 billion in revenue for Australia, largely via tourism.
As an ocean warms, its oxygen levels drop. Oxygen content in the oceans declined by an estimated 2% between 1960 and 2010, according to a study published in the journal Nature in 2017. In addition, since the First Industrial Revolution, the acidity of the oceans has increased by roughly 30% as a result of carbon dioxide dissolving in marine waters; this makes it more difficult for many organisms to form healthy skeletons and shells. Scientists from the University of British Columbia's Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries have predicted that if climate change continues unchecked, global fisheries may suffer $10 billion in annual revenue loss by 2050. Global warming-driven sea level rise may be the most impactful form of ocean-related climate change - scientists predict that half of the population in 25 megacities (cities with more than 10 million inhabitants) will be affected by sea level rise if climate change is not slowed; Miami, Shanghai and dozens of other cities have already suffered related effects. Climate change must be aggressively checked in order to enable natural adaptation and evolution, and scientists typically agree that the best way to do this is to confront the difficult task of directly reducing global carbon emissions.
Shifting Ocean Governance
Current regulation does not adequately address the changes now impacting oceans The oceans have always been difficult to govern; they cover 90% of the habitable space on the Earth, creating an immense, supranational domain with unique regulatory challenges. Unlike most natural assets on land, many ocean resources (such as the bluefin tuna that is prized for sushi) regularly swim across jurisdictional boundaries. In addition, damage incurred within one nation’s jurisdiction (like plastic pollution) can impact nations many thousands of kilometres away. Meanwhile climate change is driving seafood stocks towards the planet’s poles, to escape warming waters. This can create worrisome volatility in less-developed regions - as fish travel out of the reach of countries that need them most. Unfortunately, policies that can properly address these issues have been deferred. Two thirds of the oceans are on the high seas, or outside of the jurisdiction of any single country. The United Nations has committed to developing a first-of-its-kind, legally-binding treaty to better manage biodiversity and resources on the high seas by 2020. If it is successfully implemented, this could be a significant boon for ocean biodiversity. The cross-border migration of valuable seafood has the potential to not only deprive developing economies of resources, but also spur regional conflict. Research published in the journal Science in 2018 suggested that as many as 70 countries will see new fish stocks in their national waters by the year 2100, as a result of climate change. New international agreements are needed to govern the sharing of fishery resources, and to prevent countries from overharvesting stocks when they realize their assets are migrating beyond their borders. One positive development in the world of ocean governance has been the establishment of marine protected areas. These can buy time for at-risk ecosystems to better adapt to climate change. However, based on a review of 144 studies, researchers at the University of York have concluded that about 30% of the oceans would need to be placed within protected areas in order to meet ocean health management goals - though just over 7% is currently protected. The United Kingdom has protected an area of ocean larger than the country’s own land mass, and Chile, the US, and Kiribati have established protected areas that are collectively larger than Italy - now, other countries need to catch up.
Overfishing
Fish are being removed from the sea faster than they can be replaced
The scientific philosopher Thomas Henry Huxley assured everyone in 1883 that it would be impossible to deplete populations of prolific fish like cod, mackerel, and herring. Within a century, he was proven wrong. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reported in 2018 that about a third of global fish stocks are overfished - not least because fishing laws promote the philosophy that anything fishermen fail to harvest themselves will just be taken by others. Research published in 2016 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggested that replacing antiquated fishery governance systems with rights-based fishery management tools could increase fisheries’ collective annual profit by $53 billion. These tools can be used to allocate individual fishing rights to local fishermen and fishing communities, and their successful adoption has been documented in Australia, Iceland, and Mexico. Another issue is wasteful inefficiency; many fisheries capture, kill, and potentially discard marine species like sharks, dolphins, and sea turtles regardless of their suitability as potential food, and the damage that this causes imperils broader ecosystem health.
Illegal and unreported fishing exacerbates overfishing, and is a growing problem. According to a study published in 2014 in Marine Policy, up to a third of all wild seafood imported in the US is believed to be illegally caught. In the case of long-living, slow-growing marine species, a single incident of illegal fishing can set an ocean ecosystem back by decades. New surveillance technologies and platforms for data sharing are needed in order to rein in illegal fishing; one promising related development is the Agreement on Port State Measures, a global treaty that went into force in 2016 and can curb illegal fishing vessels’ access to ports. However, more countries are needed to back the agreement. There are a variety of other ways to combat overfishing, including a more strategic review of the billions of dollars spent globally on harmful fishery subsidies that, in many instances, promote economically-irrational overfishing (an effort is now underway at the World Trade Organization to pursue related reform). Replicating the European Union’s yellow/red card program for combating illegal fishing, which blocks market access to non-compliant foreign supply nations, is another potential option. Better controlling overfishing and illegal fishing is an increasingly critical element of safeguarding global food security, and of ensuring the health and prosperity of coastal economies.
Emerging Ocean Technologies
New opportunities for ocean-based industries are emerging, and so are challenges Emerging technologies are changing the way we harvest food, energy, minerals, and data from the ocean. Rapid innovation in marine robotics, artificial intelligence, low-cost sensors, satellite systems, and methods for collecting and analysing data may yet create a cleaner and safer future - though these developments also present potential challenges for ocean health. Ocean mining is one example; portions of the seafloor are rich in gold, platinum, cobalt, and rare-earth elements, though these resources have up until now been out of reach. New, 300-ton mining machines have been developed that can harvest minerals in some of the deepest parts of the sea. Japan has completed its first large-scale mineral extraction from the seabed, and plans to begin commercial mining in its waters within the next decade. Meanwhile on the high seas, the Jamaica-based International Seabed Authority has issued more than 1 million square kilometres of mining exploration claims to 20 different countries. However, much of the seabed within these claims remains unexplored, and new species are frequently being discovered in the vicinity. It remains unclear if and how sediment plumes from seabed mining will affect the health of oceans generally, and fisheries specifically. Finding a way to properly balance mining interests against potential impacts on ocean ecosystems and marine industries remains a challenge. A revolution in our ability to collect and process ocean data has now enabled the detection of illegal fishing from space, empowered sustainability-focused companies to more efficiently connect with people, and helped build intelligent zoning plans that better balance the needs of fishermen, marine transportation, and ocean conservation. In addition, new technologies are being developed to plug into the ocean’s enormous stores of green energy (possibilities include wave energy, tidal energy, thermal energy, and offshore wind). A record 4,331 megawatts of new offshore wind power was installed around the world during 2017, according to the Global Wind Energy Council, which increased the size of the market by 95%. While remaining hurdles to harvesting ocean energy include cost efficiency and the potential impact of new ocean power plants on ocean life, other exciting innovations are on the way: a robot that swims like a tuna, underwater data centres, autonomous self-driving ships, and geodesic spheres that can serve as offshore fish farms, for example. Properly embraced, disruptive technologies can help us take more from the oceans while damaging them less.

суббота, 25 мая 2019 г.

Industry 4.0 - General Overview


The Fourth Industrial Revolution represents a fundamental change in the way we live, work, and relate to one another. It is a new chapter in human development, enabled by technology advances that are commensurate with those of the first, second and third industrial revolutions, and which are merging the physical, digital, and biological worlds in ways that create both promise and peril. The speed, breadth, and depth of this revolution is forcing us to rethink how countries should develop, how organizations create value, and even what it means to be human; it is an opportunity to help everyone, including leaders, policy-makers and people from all income groups and nations, to harness technologies in order to create an inclusive, human-centred future.

Industry 4.0 is a name given to the current trend of automation and data exchange in manufacturing technologies. It includes cyber-physical systems, the Internet of thingscloud computing[1][2][3][4] and cognitive computing. Industry 4.0 is commonly referred to as the fourth industrial revolution.[5]
Industry 4.0 fosters what has been called a "smart factory". Within modular structured smart factories, cyber-physical systems monitor physical processes, create a virtual copy of the physical world and make decentralized decisions. Over the Internet of Things, cyber-physical systems communicate and cooperate with each other and with humans in real-time both internally and across organizational services offered and used by participants of the value chain.[1]


Industrial revolutions and future viewBy ChristophRoser. Please credit "Christoph Roser at AllAboutLean.com". - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47640595

Name

The term "Industry 4.0", shortened to I4.0 or simply I4, originates from a project in the high-tech strategy of the German government, which promotes the computerization of manufacturing.[6]
The term "Industry 4.0" was revived in 2011 at the Hannover Fair.[7] In October 2012 the Working Group on Industry 4.0 presented a set of Industry 4.0 implementation recommendations to the German federal government. The Industry 4.0 workgroup members and partners are recognized as the founding fathers and driving force behind Industry 4.0.
On 8 April 2013 at the Hannover Fair, the final report of the Working Group Industry 4.0 was presented.[8]. This working group was headed by Siegfried Dais (Robert Bosch GmbH) and Henning Kagermann (German Academy of Science and Engineering).
As Industry 4.0 principles have been applied by companies they have sometimes been re-branded, for example the aerospace parts manufacturer Meggitt PLC has branded its own Industry 4.0 research project M4. [9]

Design principles

There are four design principles in Industry 4.0. These principles support companies in identifying and implementing Industry 4.0 scenarios.[1]
  • Interconnection: The ability of machines, devices, sensors, and people to connect and communicate with each other via the Internet of Things (IoT) or the Internet of People (IoP)[10]
  • Information transparency: The transparency afforded by Industry 4.0 technology provides operators with vast amounts of useful information needed to make appropriate decisions. Inter-connectivity allows operators to collect immense amounts of data and information from all points in the manufacturing process, thus aiding functionality and identifying key areas that can benefit from innovation and improvement.[11]
  • Technical assistance: First, the ability of assistance systems to support humans by aggregating and visualizing information comprehensively for making informed decisions and solving urgent problems on short notice. Second, the ability of cyber physical systems to physically support humans by conducting a range of tasks that are unpleasant, too exhausting, or unsafe for their human co-workers.
  • Decentralized decisions: The ability of cyber physical systems to make decisions on their own and to perform their tasks as autonomously as possible. Only in the case of exceptions, interferences, or conflicting goals, are tasks delegated to a higher level.

Meaning

The characteristics given for the German government's Industry 4.0 strategy are: the strong customization of products under the conditions of highly flexible (mass-) production.[12]The required automation technology is improved by the introduction of methods of self-optimization, self-configuration,[13] self-diagnosis, cognition and intelligent support of workers in their increasingly complex work.[14] The largest project in Industry 4.0 as of July 2013 is the BMBF leading-edge cluster "Intelligent Technical Systems Ostwestfalen-Lippe (it's OWL)". Another major project is the BMBF project RES-COM,[15] as well as the Cluster of Excellence "Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries".[16] In 2015, the European Commission started the international Horizon 2020 research project CREMA[17] (Providing Cloud-based Rapid Elastic Manufacturing based on the XaaS and Cloud model) as a major initiative to foster the Industry 4.0 topic.

Effects

In June 2013, consultancy firm McKinsey[18] released an interview featuring an expert discussion between executives at Robert Bosch – Siegfried Dais (Partner of the Robert Bosch Industrietreuhand KG) and Heinz Derenbach (CEO of Bosch Software Innovations GmbH) – and McKinsey experts. This interview addressed the prevalence of the Internet of Things in manufacturing and the consequent technology-driven changes which promise to trigger a new industrial revolution. At Bosch, and generally in Germany, this phenomenon is referred to as Industry 4.0. The basic principle of Industry 4.0 is that by connecting machines, work pieces and systems, businesses are creating intelligent networks along the entire value chain that can control each other autonomously.
Some examples for Industry 4.0 are machines which can predict failures and trigger maintenance processes autonomously or self-organized logistics which react to unexpected changes in production.
According to Dais, "it is highly likely that the world of production will become more and more networked until everything is interlinked with everything else". While this sounds like a fair assumption and the driving force behind the Internet of Things, it also means that the complexity of production and supplier networks will grow enormously. Networks and processes have so far been limited to one factory. But in an Industry 4.0 scenario, these boundaries of individual factories will most likely no longer exist. Instead, they will be lifted in order to interconnect multiple factories or even geographical regions.
There are differences between a typical traditional factory and an Industry 4.0 factory. In the current industry environment, providing high-end quality service or product with the least cost is the key to success and industrial factories are trying to achieve as much performance as possible to increase their profit as well as their reputation. In this way, various data sources are available to provide worthwhile information about different aspects of the factory. In this stage, the utilization of data for understanding current operating conditions and detecting faults and failures is an important topic to research. e.g. in production, there are various commercial tools available to provide overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) information to factory management in order to highlight the root causes of problems and possible faults in the system. In contrast, in an Industry 4.0 factory, in addition to condition monitoring and fault diagnosis, components and systems are able to gain self-awareness and self-predictiveness, which will provide management with more insight on the status of the factory. Furthermore, peer-to-peer comparison and fusion of health information from various components provides a precise health prediction in component and system levels and forces factory management to trigger required maintenance at the best possible time to reach just-in-time maintenance and gain near-zero downtime.[19]
During EDP Open Innovation conducted in Oct 2018 at Lisbon, Portugal, Industry 4.0 conceptualization was extended by Sensfix B.V. a Dutch company with introduction of M2S terminology. It essentially is characterizing upcoming service industry to cater to millions of machines, managed by the machines themselves.

Challenges

Challenges in implementation of Industry 4.0:[20]
  • IT security issues, which are greatly aggravated by the inherent need to open up those previously closed production shops
  • Reliability and stability needed for critical machine-to-machine communication (M2M), including very short and stable latency times
  • Need to maintain the integrity of production processes
  • Need to avoid any IT snags, as those would cause expensive production outages
  • Need to protect industrial know-how (contained also in the control files for the industrial automation gear)
  • Lack of adequate skill-sets to expedite the transition towards the fourth industrial revolution
  • Threat of redundancy of the corporate IT department
  • General reluctance to change by stakeholders
  • Loss of many jobs to automatic processes and IT-controlled processes, especially for blue collar workers
  • Low top management commitment
  • Unclear legal issues and data security
  • Unclear economic benefits/ excessive investment
  • Lack of regulation, standards and forms of certifications
  • Insufficient qualification of employees

Role of big data and analytics

Modern information and communication technologies like cyber-physical systembig data analytics and cloud computing, will help early detection of defects and production failures, thus enabling their prevention and increasing productivity, quality, and agility benefits that have significant competitive value.
Big data analytics consists of 6Cs in the integrated Industry 4.0 and cyber physical systems environment. The 6C system comprises:
  1. Connection (sensor and networks)
  2. Cloud (computing and data on demand)
  3. Cyber (model & memory)
  4. Content/context (meaning and correlation)
  5. Community (sharing & collaboration)
  6. Customization (personalization and value)
In this scenario and in order to provide useful insight to the factory management, data has to be processed with advanced tools (analytics and algorithms) to generate meaningful information. Considering the presence of visible and invisible issues in an industrial factory, the information generation algorithm has to be capable of detecting and addressing invisible issues such as machine degradation, component wear, etc. in the factory floor.[21][22]

Impact of Industry 4.0

Proponents of the term claim Industry 4.0 will affect many areas, most notably:
  1. Services and business models
  2. Reliability and continuous productivity
  3. IT security: Companies like SymantecCisco, and Penta Security have already begun to address the issue of IoT security
  4. Machine safety
  5. Manufacturing Sales
  6. Product lifecycles
  7. Manufacturing Industries: Mass Customisations instead of mass manufacturing using IOT, 3D Printing and Machine Learning
  8. Industry value chain
  9. Workers' education and skills
  10. Socio-economic factors
An article published in February 2016 suggests that Industry 4.0 may have a beneficial effects for emerging economies such as India.[23] The aerospace industry has sometimes been characterized as "too low volume for extensive automation" however Industry 4.0 principles have been investigated by several aerospace companies, technologies have been developed to improve productivity where the upfront cost of automation cannot be justified, one example of this is the aerospace parts manufacturer Meggitt PLC's project, M4. [24]The discussion of how the shift to Industry 4.0, especially digitalization, will affect the labour market is being discussed in Germany under the topic of Work 4.0.[25]

Technology road map for Industry 4.0

A "road map" enables whomsoever in industry to directly realize each move and what act need to be accomplish, who needs to make them and when. This method is decoded into a project plan, defining the characteristics of activity in each of the accompanying stages of formation. Considering an internationalized world, the need to actualize development strategies that can secure the sustainable competitiveness of establishments is the main issue. It is in this topic that Industry 4.0 road map grants itself as a visually pictured clear trail to boost the competitiveness of organizations.

The key benefits of technology road mapping

  • Setting up coalition of technical and commercial master plans
  • Making better communication across teams and companies
  • Inspecting prospective competitive strategies and ways to carry out those strategies
  • Competent time management and mapping out
  • Conceptualizing outputs including goals, activities, and progresses.[26]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c Hermann, Pentek, Otto, 2016: Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, accessed on 4 May 2016
  2. ^ Jürgen Jasperneite:Was hinter Begriffen wie Industrie 4.0 steckt in Computer & Automation, 19 December 2012 accessed on 23 December 2012
  3. ^ Kagermann, H., W. Wahlster and J. Helbig, eds., 2013: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group
  4. ^ Heiner Lasi, Hans-Georg Kemper, Peter Fettke, Thomas Feld, Michael Hoffmann: Industry 4.0. In: Business & Information Systems Engineering 4 (6), pp. 239-242
  5. ^ Marr, Bernard. "Why Everyone Must Get Ready For The 4th Industrial Revolution". Forbes. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
  6. ^ BMBF-Internetredaktion (21 January 2016). "Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0 - BMBF". Bmbf.de. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  7. ^ "Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. industriellen Revolution". Vdi-nachrichten.com (in German). 1 April 2011. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  8. ^ Industrie 4.0 Plattform Last download on 15. Juli 2013
  9. ^ "Time to join the digital dots". 22 June 2018. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  10. ^ Bonner, Mike. "What is Industry 4.0 and What Does it Mean for My Manufacturing?". Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  11. ^ Bonner, Mike. "What is Industry 4.0 and What Does it Mean for My Manufacturing?". Retrieved 24 September 2018.
  12. ^ "This Is Not the Fourth Industrial Revolution". 29 January 2016 – via Slate.
  13. ^ Selbstkonfiguierende Automation für Intelligente Technische Systeme, Video, last download on 27. Dezember 2012
  14. ^ Jürgen Jasperneite; Oliver, Niggemann: Intelligente Assistenzsysteme zur Beherrschung der Systemkomplexität in der Automation. In: ATP edition - Automatisierungstechnische Praxis, 9/2012, Oldenbourg Verlag, München, September 2012
  15. ^ "Herzlich willkommen auf den Internetseiten des Projekts RES-COM - RES-COM Webseite". Res-com-projekt.de. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  16. ^ "RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY Cluster of Excellence "Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries" - English". Production-research.de. 19 October 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  17. ^ "H2020 CREMA - Cloud-based Rapid Elastic Manufacturing". Crema-project.eu. 21 November 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  18. ^ Markus Liffler; Andreas Tschiesner (6 January 2013). "The Internet of Things and the future of manufacturing | McKinsey & Company". Mckinsey.com. Retrieved 30 November2016.
  19. ^ Mueller, Egon; Chen, Xiao-Li; Riedel, Ralph (2017). "Challenges and Requirements for the Application of Industry 4.0: A Special Insight with the Usage of Cyber-Physical System". Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering30 (5): 1050–1057. doi:10.1007/s10033-017-0164-7.
  20. ^ "BIBB : Industrie 4.0 und die Folgen für Arbeitsmarkt und Wirtschaft" (PDF)Doku.iab.de (in German). August 2015. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  21. ^ Lee, Jay; Bagheri, Behrad; Kao, Hung-An (2014). "Recent Advances and Trends of Cyber-Physical Systems and Big Data Analytics in Industrial Informatics". IEEE Int. Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) 2014doi:10.13140/2.1.1464.1920.
  22. ^ Lee, Jay; Lapira, Edzel; Bagheri, Behrad; Kao, Hung-an (October 2013). "Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment". Manufacturing Letters1 (1): 38–41. doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005.
  23. ^ Anil K. Rajvanshi (24 February 2016). "India Can Gain By Leapfrogging Into Fourth Industrial Revolution". The Quint. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  24. ^ "Time to join the digital dots". 22 June 2018. Retrieved 25 July 2018.
  25. ^ Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of Germany (2015). Re-Imagining Work: White Paper Work 4.0.
  26. ^ Sarvari, Peiman Alipour; Ustundag, Alp; Cevikcan, Emre; Kaya, Ihsan; Cebi, Selcuk (16 September 2017), "Technology Roadmap for Industry 4.0", Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing, pp. 95–103, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_5, ISBN 9783319578699