Показаны сообщения с ярлыком framework. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком framework. Показать все сообщения

суббота, 8 февраля 2025 г.

RoundMap® : Framework 48 Lenses

 


The RoundMap™ framework addresses many focus areas and suggests multiple mindsets to comprehensively understand your business, its environment, and its dynamics. By putting on multiple Thinking Caps, you can obtain a panoptic view of your team, division, or business situation (panoptic is derived from the Greek panoptēs, meaning “all-seeing”).

We advise clients to select between 6 and 12 dimensions most relevant to their (desired) situation. As each Thinking Cap comes with 30 questions, selecting 6 viewpoints will provide a 180° Panoptic, while 12 dimensions will provide a 360° Panoptic. We’ve mapped 12 random Thinking Caps in the image below for illustration purposes.


Overview of Thinking Caps

Below is a rich pallet of 48 Thinking Caps, consisting of 24 focus areas and 24 mindsets. We’re not implying that this is a complete list or that you should draw dividing lines between them. However, putting on any number of complementary Thinking Caps will give you a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of your business.

24 Focus Areas

Bottom-line Thinking Cap

Bottom-line thinking is a mindset that prioritizes and focuses on the ultimate outcome or result of a decision, action, or initiative. It involves considering choices’ financial, practical, and strategic implications to determine their impact on the overall bottom line or end goal. Bottom-line thinking involves assessing different options’ costs, benefits, and risks and making decisions that optimize resources and maximize desired outcomes. It emphasizes efficiency, effectiveness, and the ability to achieve measurable results. Bottom-line thinking encourages individuals to consider their decisions’ long-term sustainability and profitability and to align their actions with organizational objectives or personal goals. It helps ensure that choices and actions contribute to the overall success and deliver tangible value or impact

SCOPE: profitability, shareholder value, decision-making, budgeting, management, efficiency, measurements, results, KPIs

RELATED: Growth analysis, risk analysis, budgeting, strategy execution, scenario planning

OPPOSITE: Stakeholder value, sustainability, effectiveness, customer value, employee health, and intangible outcomes

Brand Thinking Cap

Brand thinking focuses on developing and managing a strong, memorable brand identity. It shapes perceptions, builds trust, and creates a positive brand image through consistent messaging and experiences. It requires understanding the target audience, crafting a compelling brand story, and effectively communicating value. Brand thinking involves continuous brand management and adaptation to stay relevant in the marketplace. It drives brand loyalty, recognition, and long-term business success.

SCOPE: Corporate identity, PR, brand value, reputation management

RELATED: Marketing communications, customer loyalty, attraction

OPPOSITE: Profit-driven, short-termism

Budget Thinking Cap

Budget thinking is a mindset and approach that prioritizes careful planning, allocation, and management of financial resources within a defined budgetary framework. It involves considering the financial constraints and goals of an individual, organization, or project when making decisions and setting priorities. Budget thinking entails analyzing income and expenses, identifying areas for cost optimization, and making informed choices to ensure expenditures align with available funds. It emphasizes the importance of fiscal responsibility, efficiency, and achieving desired outcomes within the allocated financial limits. Budget thinking is vital in financial planning, resource allocation, and stability.

Business Model Thinking Cap

Business model thinking refers to the systematic analysis and design of the fundamental structure and components that drive the success and sustainability of a business. It involves a deep understanding of how a company creates, delivers, and captures value in the market. Business model thinking requires examining the key elements such as value proposition, target customers, revenue streams, cost structure, key partnerships, and distribution channels. It encourages entrepreneurs and business leaders to critically assess their existing models, challenge assumptions, and explore innovative approaches to gain a competitive edge. By adopting business model thinking, organizations can adapt to changing market dynamics, identify new opportunities, optimize their operations, and create sustainable and profitable business models that align with their goals and customer needs.

Change Thinking Cap

Change (readiness) thinking prepares organizations for successful change. It assesses readiness, addresses barriers, and fosters a supportive environment. It involves training, communication, and engagement to enhance employee readiness. Leadership plays a crucial role in guiding and inspiring change. Change readiness thinking enables organizations to adapt, minimize resistance, and seize opportunities in a dynamic business environment.

Customer Dev. Thinking Cap

Customer (development) thinking focuses on understanding and validating customer needs to build successful businesses. It involves customer discovery, validation, creation, and company building. Entrepreneurs engage with customers, refine their models based on feedback, and test assumptions. This customer-centric approach reduces risks, encourages experimentation, and promotes adaptive learning. It leads to market-driven businesses that effectively meet customer demands and achieve long-term growth.

Digital Thinking Cap

Digital thinking leverages technology for problem-solving, decision-making, and communication. It recognizes the transformative power of digital innovation and its potential for achieving outcomes. It involves navigating, evaluating, and utilizing digital information ethically. Digital thinking fosters critical reflection on the impact of technology on society, privacy, and ethics. It promotes digital literacy, computational thinking, and leveraging digital tools for analysis and collaboration. Digital thinking enables individuals to adapt to technological advancements and make informed decisions in a connected world.

Growth Thinking Cap

Growth (development) thinking drives sustainable business growth through strategic planning and innovation. It involves seizing opportunities, improving operations, and expanding market share. By analyzing trends, customer behaviors, and competition, businesses optimize their strategies and explore new markets. Agility and adaptability are key, challenging the status quo for long-term success.

Innovative Thinking Cap

Innovative thinking generates and implements new ideas to overcome challenges and create value. It embraces curiosity, creativity, and exploration. It breaks free from conventional patterns, challenges assumptions, and takes calculated risks. Innovative thinking identifies opportunities and approaches them with a fresh perspective. It connects unrelated concepts, combines knowledge in novel ways, and explores alternatives. It values experimentation, iteration, and learning from failures for continuous improvement and breakthroughs. Innovative thinking nurtures an environment that rewards creativity, collaboration, and diverse perspectives. It drives progress, competitiveness, and adaptability in various domains.

Leadership Thinking Cap

Leadership thinking guides individuals in leadership positions to inspire and influence others toward shared goals. It involves strategic thinking, emotional intelligence, and effective decision-making. Leadership thinking envisions the future, sets direction, and communicates a compelling vision. It fosters a positive culture, builds relationships, and empowers others. It includes communication, motivation, and ethical considerations. Leadership thinking promotes adaptability, resilience, and navigating change. It inspires others, drives innovation, and achieves success in various contexts.

Management Thinking Cap

Management thinking applies principles, strategies, and techniques to coordinate resources, processes, and people. It involves planning, organizing, executing, and controlling activities to achieve outcomes. Management thinking uses a systematic approach to problem-solving and decision-making. It includes analyzing data, setting objectives, allocating resources, and monitoring progress. Management thinking organizes workflows, motivates teams, and resolves conflicts. It promotes efficiency, productivity, and operational excellence. Management thinking drives organizational objectives and sustainable growth.

Market Dev. Thinking Cap

Market development thinking focuses on expanding into new markets. It involves identifying opportunities, segmenting markets, and developing tailored strategies. Businesses adapt offerings to suit new dynamics by researching and understanding customer preferences. Through geographical expansion or targeting underserved demographics, they drive growth, increase market share, and diversify their customer base.

Mission Thinking Cap

Mission thinking centers around purpose, values, and long-term objectives. It aligns actions, decisions, and strategies with the mission to create impact. It emphasizes clarity, understanding the “why,” and aligning efforts with a larger vision. Mission thinking reflects on values, defines a mission statement, and ensures alignment. It inspires commitment and determination to make a positive difference. Mission thinking promotes accountability and progress assessment. It fosters identity, resilience, and meaningful impact.

Organizational Thinking Cap

Organizational thinking optimizes an organization’s structures, processes, and dynamics. It evaluates goals, culture, resources, systems, and relationships. This holistic view recognizes interconnections. By assessing internal and external factors, it identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. It guides decision-making for effectiveness and efficiency. Strategic planning, goal-setting, and resource alignment drive desired outcomes. Organizational thinking fosters collaboration, effective leadership, and a positive work environment. It encourages innovation, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Leaders rely on it to navigate challenges and leverage strengths. Applying this approach enhances performance, optimizes processes, and achieves sustainable success.

Product Dev. Thinking Cap

Product (development) thinking is a customer-centric approach to creating valuable products. It involves market research, ideation, prototyping, testing, and iteration. Businesses develop innovative and competitive offerings by understanding customer needs, collaborating cross-functionally, and incorporating feedback. This proactive mindset drives growth and ensures products meet evolving demands.

Purpose Thinking Cap

Purpose thinking centers on clarifying and aligning actions with a higher sense of purpose. It involves understanding core values, aligning goals with purpose, and finding inspiration in meaningful contributions. Purpose thinking fosters intrinsic motivation, adaptability, and a sense of fulfillment, driving individuals and organizations toward their potential.

Risk Thinking Cap

Risk thinking is a proactive approach to recognizing, assessing, and managing potential risks. It involves analyzing the probability and impact of risks, taking measures to mitigate them. Risk thinking identifies threats and uncertainties that could hinder objectives. It emphasizes understanding consequences and trade-offs. It includes contingency planning, risk assessments, and mitigation strategies. Risk thinking promotes informed decision-making and calculated risks while minimizing negative outcomes. It enables navigating uncertainty for successful outcomes.

Scenario Thinking Cap

Scenario thinking explores alternative futures, assessing risks and opportunities. It involves creating plausible scenarios, analyzing uncertainties, and considering interdependencies. It supports decision-making by evaluating strategic choices across scenarios. Scenario thinking stimulates strategic conversations, fosters innovation, and promotes adaptive planning. It identifies early warning signals for timely action. This approach enables proactive, agile strategies in a rapidly changing world.

Shareholder Thinking Cap

Shareholder thinking refers to an approach where decision-making and strategic planning primarily focus on the interests and expectations of the shareholders or owners of a company or organization. It entails considering the financial returns and value creation for shareholders as a key priority. Shareholder thinking often involves assessing business decisions based on their potential impact on shareholder wealth, dividends, stock prices, and overall financial performance. It recognizes that shareholders are key stakeholders who have invested capital in the organization and expect a return.

Stakeholder Thinking Cap

Stakeholder thinking recognizes diverse interests and impacts. It considers a broad range of stakeholders and their perspectives. It engages and incorporates their input in decision-making. This approach promotes ethics, responsibility, and shared value creation. By balancing stakeholder interests, organizations build trust and sustainable relationships for mutual benefit.

Strategic Thinking Cap

Strategic thinking analyzes, formulates long-term plans, and considers future impact. It assesses internal and external factors, identifies trends, and anticipates challenges. Strategic thinking requires critical and creative thinking, and the ability to take calculated risks. It involves evaluating trade-offs and making informed choices. Strategic thinking is vital for leaders, aligning resources and guiding the organization. It enhances competitiveness, adaptation, and success.

Structural Thinking Cap

Structural thinking in organizational development analyzes and designs structures and systems to align with goals, enhance efficiency, and enable effective decision-making. It involves restructuring departments, roles, and workflows to improve performance and collaboration. This approach balances stability and flexibility while considering interdependencies. Structural thinking promotes intentional design to foster agility, efficiency, and growth in organizations.

Transformational Thinking Cap

Transformational thinking is a cognitive approach that challenges norms, seeks radical change, and envisions a better future. It questions assumptions, embraces innovation, and takes calculated risks. It inspires visionary leadership, fosters collaboration, and empowers individuals to drive positive transformations. By pushing boundaries and embracing creativity, transformational thinking uncovers innovative solutions to complex problems, driving lasting change on various levels. It shapes a better future through bold ideas, strategic planning, and a commitment to growth.

Vision Thinking Cap

Vision thinking imagines and conceptualizes a desired future state. It taps into creativity and foresight to envision what could be. Setting ambitious goals and communicating a clear vision inspire and motivate others. Vision thinking anticipates trends and embraces innovation for transformative change. It provides meaning, guides decision-making and engages stakeholders. Cultivating vision thinking inspires, fosters innovation, and creates a positive impact.

24 Mindsets

Agile Thinking Cap

Agile thinking is a mindset and methodology that promotes adaptability, collaboration, and iterative project management and problem-solving progress. It involves embracing change, breaking down complex tasks into smaller manageable ones, and delivering incremental value through regular feedback and adjustments. Agile thinking prioritizes customer satisfaction, cross-functional collaboration, and self-organizing teams. It emphasizes flexibility, continuous improvement, and quick response to evolving requirements or market conditions. By promoting transparency, open communication, and continuous learning, agile thinking enables organizations to deliver high-quality results efficiently, foster innovation, and effectively navigate dynamic and complex environments.

SCOPE: Teamwork, cross-functional collaboration, problem-solving, innovation, feedback, change readiness, adaptability, flexibility, digital transformation, customer development, and continuous improvement

RELATED: Lean, Scrum, SAFe, Kanban, DevOps, Design Thinking

OPPOSITE: Linear Thinking

Analytical Thinking Cap

Analytical thinking refers to breaking down complex problems or situations into smaller components, analyzing them systematically, and drawing logical conclusions based on evidence and reasoning. It involves applying a logical and structured approach to problem-solving and decision-making, utilizing critical thinking skills and analytical tools. Analytical thinking entails gathering relevant information, identifying patterns, evaluating data, and considering multiple perspectives to understand the problem or situation comprehensively. It emphasizes identifying cause-and-effect relationships, making inferences, and generating insights to guide effective actions or solutions. Analytical thinking enables individuals to approach challenges systematically and objectively, allowing for well-informed and rational decision-making processes.

SCOPE: Complicated problem-solving, evidence-based decision-making, engineering, identifying patterns and trends, cause-and-effect relationships, and critical thinking

RELATED: Data-driven, facts, patterns, logical thinking

OPPOSITE: Systems thinking, creative thinking, design thinking

Agile Thinking Cap

Agile thinking is a mindset and methodology that promotes adaptability, collaboration, and iterative project management and problem-solving progress. It involves embracing change, breaking down complex tasks into smaller manageable ones, and delivering incremental value through regular feedback and adjustments. Agile thinking prioritizes customer satisfaction, cross-functional collaboration, and self-organizing teams. It emphasizes flexibility, continuous improvement, and quick response to evolving requirements or market conditions. By promoting transparency, open communication, and continuous learning, agile thinking enables organizations to deliver high-quality results efficiently, foster innovation, and effectively navigate dynamic and complex environments.

SCOPE: Teamwork, cross-functional collaboration, problem-solving, innovation, feedback, change readiness, adaptability, flexibility, digital transformation, customer development, and continuous improvement

RELATED: Lean, Scrum, SAFe, Kanban, DevOps, Design Thinking

OPPOSITE: Linear Thinking

Antifragile Thinking Cap

Antifragile thinking thrives in uncertainty, learning, and adapting from disruptions. It embraces chaos as an opportunity for growth and innovation. Failures are seen as valuable feedback, leading to improvements. Antifragile thinkers diversify options, build robustness, and consider long-term consequences. This mindset fosters resilience and agility, enabling individuals and organizations to flourish in ever-changing environments.

Behavioral Thinking Cap

Behavioral thinking focuses on understanding human behavior, including thoughts, actions, and emotions. It examines factors influencing behavior, such as individual traits and social norms. By studying patterns and triggers, it predicts responses and facilitates behavior change. Behavioral thinking informs decision-making, interventions, and environment design to support desired outcomes.

Circular Thinking Cap

Circular thinking prioritizes sustainability and resourcefulness, considering the entire lifecycle of products or processes. It aims to minimize waste, maximize reuse or recycling, and promote regenerative practices. This approach embraces innovative design principles like cradle-to-cradle, prioritizing durability and the use of renewable resources. Circular thinking challenges the linear model of consumption, advocating for circular economies that are economically and environmentally beneficial. By embracing circular thinking, individuals and organizations contribute to a more sustainable future.

Collaborative Thinking Cap

Collaborative thinking is a collective cognitive process where individuals actively work together to generate ideas and solve problems. It fosters cooperation, open communication, and mutual respect among team members. Collaborative thinking promotes active listening, feedback, and exchanging insights. It harnesses the group’s collective intelligence, challenges assumptions, and generates innovative solutions. It enhances creativity, problem-solving, and decision-making, leading to effective teamwork and robust outcomes.

Conditional Thinking Cap

Conditional thinking (“what if”) involves reasoning and decision-making based on specific conditions or contingencies. It considers cause-and-effect relationships, potential outcomes, and dependencies. It helps individuals assess the likelihood and implications of different scenarios. Conditional thinking enables strategic planning, problem-solving, and adapting to changing circumstances. It optimizes outcomes by aligning choices with specific conditions.

Creative Thinking Cap

Creative thinking generates innovative ideas, solutions, and perspectives. It breaks free from conventions, embraces novelty, and explores new possibilities. It involves questioning assumptions, connecting unrelated concepts, and thinking outside the box. Creative thinking encompasses imagination, curiosity, flexibility, and divergent thinking. It explores multiple perspectives, embraces experimentation, and promotes unconventional solutions. It fosters innovation, problem-solving, and pushes boundaries of knowledge.

Critical Thinking Cap

Critical thinking is the process of objectively analyzing and evaluating information, ideas, or arguments to form well-reasoned judgments or decisions. It involves questioning assumptions, examining evidence, considering multiple perspectives, and employing logical reasoning to arrive at informed and thoughtful conclusions. It enables individuals to discern between fact and opinion, detect biases, and navigate complex problems with intellectual rigor and open-mindedness. Critical thinking fosters intellectual independence and empowers individuals to make informed choices in various aspects of life.

Cultural Thinking Cap

Cultural thinking appreciates diverse cultural perspectives, values, and norms. It recognizes the impact of culture on beliefs and interactions, considering cultural context in decision-making. Cultural thinking develops competence, awareness, and sensitivity to different cultural backgrounds. It fosters inclusive environments, challenges biases, and cultivates empathy. It promotes cross-cultural understanding, effective communication, and collaboration in multicultural settings.

Cyclical Thinking Cap

Cyclical thinking embraces the concept of recurring cycles and interconnectedness. It recognizes predictable patterns and interdependencies within systems. By analyzing past experiences and historical patterns, it informs decision-making for the future. Cyclical thinking acknowledges natural, economic, and social cycles, enabling adaptation and identification of opportunities within patterns. It promotes a holistic perspective to navigate complexities and understand the dynamic nature of the world.

Design Thinking Cap

Design thinking is a human-centered, iterative problem-solving approach that emphasizes understanding user needs, challenging assumptions, and generating innovative solutions. It involves empathizing with users, defining the problem, ideating potential solutions, prototyping ideas, and testing them with users. Design thinking fosters collaboration, embraces ambiguity, and aims to create meaningful experiences by putting users at the center of the design process.

Dialectic Thinking Cap

Dialectical thinking embraces contradictions, opposing viewpoints, and complexity. It holds multiple perspectives, understanding that reality often involves conflicting elements. It explores paradoxes and tensions, seeking synthesis between opposing ideas. Dialectical thinking goes beyond binary thought, considering nuances and diverse viewpoints. It fosters critical analysis, intellectual flexibility, and navigating ambiguity. It deepens understanding of complex problems, encourages creative problem-solving, and synthesizes ideas for comprehensive perspectives.

Didactic Thinking Cap

Didactic thinking is an instructional approach that emphasizes clear communication and structured content delivery. It focuses on providing foundational knowledge and follows a teacher-centered approach. With specific learning goals, it aims to transmit information effectively, but it may not encompass interactive or participatory learning methods.

Emphathic Thinking Cap

Empathic thinking emphasizes understanding and relating to others’ thoughts and experiences. It involves actively listening, observing cues, and engaging in non-judgmental dialogue. By embracing empathic thinking, individuals can understand others, build relationships, improve communication, make informed decisions, and drive positive change. It fosters compassion, empathy, and inclusivity for a more interconnected society.

Environmental Thinking Cap

Environmental thinking considers the impact of human activities on the environment and promotes sustainable practices. It recognizes the interconnectedness of ecosystems, finite resources, and the need to preserve the environment for future generations. Environmental thinking involves understanding environmental challenges, mitigating their effects, and promoting conservation and sustainable resource management. It fosters responsibility, stewardship, and respect for nature, guiding decision-making and actions to coexist harmoniously with the environment.

Ethical Thinking Cap

Ethical thinking involves evaluating moral principles and consequences in decision-making. It reflects on the ethical implications of actions on individuals and society. Ethical thinking analyzes dilemmas, weighs perspectives, and aligns choices with ethical standards. It embodies integrity, fairness, and respect for others. Ethical thinking promotes critical self-assessment, considering broader impacts, and acting for the greater good. It develops moral reasoning, empathy, and a commitment to ethical conduct. Ethical thinking fosters trust, social responsibility, and a just society.

Lateral Thinking Cap

Lateral thinking is a non-linear, outside-the-box approach to problem-solving and creative thinking. It involves exploring unconventional ideas, making unexpected connections, and breaking free from traditional thought patterns. Unlike linear thinking, which follows a sequential progression, lateral thinking encourages leaps of imagination and embraces ambiguity. It encourages individuals to consider multiple perspectives, challenge assumptions, and seek alternative solutions. Lateral thinkers often employ brainstorming, analogies, and “what-if” scenarios to generate innovative ideas and overcome mental blocks.

Linear Thinking Cap

Linear thinking is a logical, step-by-step approach to problem-solving. It breaks down complex problems, analyzes them individually, and connects them sequentially. While effective in structured domains, it may overlook complexity, lack adaptability, and miss creative solutions. Complementing it with other styles, like lateral thinking, enhances problem-solving abilities for innovative solutions.

Logical Thinking Cap

Logical thinking in organizational development and change involves rational analysis, objective evaluation, and systematic reasoning. It identifies problems, develops data-driven strategies, and manages change processes. It emphasizes evidence-based decision-making and drives continuous improvement.
Motivational Thinking Cap
Motivational thinking understands and harnesses factors driving human behavior. It identifies motivators, sets meaningful goals, creates a supportive environment, tailors strategies, and inspires others. It emphasizes personalization, understanding differences, and fostering intrinsic motivation. Motivational thinking unlocks potential, achieves outcomes, and cultivates engagement.

Positive Thinking Cap

Positive thinking is an optimistic and constructive mindset emphasizing hopeful interpretations of events. It reframes challenges as growth opportunities, maintaining resilience and perseverance. It cultivates self-belief, gratitude, and a positive outlook. Positive thinking employs affirmations, visualization, and self-talk to shape attitudes and outcomes. It promotes proactive problem-solving, learning from failures, and staying motivated. Positive thinking yields psychological and physiological benefits, enhancing resilience and well-being. It fosters relationships, a supportive work environment, and personal and professional success.

Situational Thinking Cap

Situational thinking (“what is”) is assessing and adapting to specific circumstances. It involves gathering information, analyzing the situation, and considering the factors at play. Situational thinking requires flexibility and considering multiple options. It adapts communication and decision-making styles to suit the situation. It enables well-informed decisions, navigating complexities, and responding to change. Situational thinking is valuable in dynamic environments. It optimizes outcomes and manages risks.

Systems Thinking Cap

Systems thinking understands interconnected and dynamic systems. It analyzes feedback, cause-and-effect, and emergent properties. It considers the structure, behavior, and boundaries of a system and its interactions with the environment. This multidisciplinary approach helps identify leverage points and develop effective solutions. Systems thinking tackles complex problems and promotes sustainable change.

Why put on multiple Thinking Caps?

Executives need to put on multiple thinking caps to better understand their business situation. Each thinking cap represents a different perspective or framework through which executives can analyze and interpret the complexities of a business situation. Here are some key reasons why multiple thinking caps are important:

1. Broaden perspectives: Each thinking cap brings a unique viewpoint, enabling executives to see the situation from various angles. This broader perspective helps identify potential opportunities, risks, and underlying factors that may not be apparent from a single viewpoint.

2. Enhance decision-making: By considering multiple thinking caps, executives can gather a diverse range of insights, ideas, and information. This enriches their decision-making process, allowing them to weigh different options, consider various scenarios, and make more informed and well-rounded decisions.

3. Anticipate consequences: Each thinking cap prompts executives to consider their decisions’ potential consequences and implications. It encourages them to think beyond immediate outcomes and consider long-term impacts on stakeholders, resources, and the overall business strategy.

4. Challenge assumptions: Different thinking caps challenge preconceived notions and biases that executives may have. It encourages critical thinking, questioning established practices, and exploring alternative viewpoints that can lead to more innovative and effective solutions.

5. Embrace complexity: Business situations are often complex and multifaceted. Executives can navigate this complexity more effectively by putting on multiple thinking caps. It allows them to analyze various interconnected factors, relationships, and interdependencies, leading to a deeper understanding of the situation.

6. Facilitate collaboration: Each thinking cap may represent a different expertise or perspective within a team. By embracing multiple thinking caps, executives can foster collaboration, harnessing the collective intelligence of diverse team members. It encourages open dialogue, knowledge sharing, and synergy in problem-solving.

Overall, putting on multiple thinking caps helps executives to perceive a business situation from different angles, consider various aspects, challenge assumptions, and make more informed decisions. It promotes strategic thinking, agility, and adaptability in navigating the complexities of today’s business landscape.

Why is this relevant today?

When things become too erratic, forcing companies to rethink their strategy and operations daily, it’s critical to understand the organization completely. With a 360° view of the business, executives can make better-informed decisions, mitigate risks faster, adapt or pivot when needed, and know how and when to seize new opportunities.

In general, here are a few reasons to increase your understanding of the business:

1. Complexity and interconnectivity ─ In today’s world, organizations operate within intricate systems involving various stakeholders, technologies, and global networks. Understanding and navigating this complexity requires executives to adopt a systems-thinking approach. By considering the interdependencies and feedback loops within the system, executives can make more informed decisions and avoid unintended consequences.

2. Accelerated change ─ The pace of change in technology, markets, and societal expectations is constantly accelerating. Cyclical thinking allows executives to anticipate and respond to cycles of disruption and innovation. By recognizing that change is inevitable and planning for it, executives can position their organizations to adapt and thrive in dynamic environments.

3. VUCA environment ─ The business landscape is volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA). To thrive in such an environment, executives need a positive thinking mindset. Focusing on strengths and possibilities rather than dwelling on challenges fosters resilience, agility, and innovation. It enables executives to lead their teams through uncertainty and drive positive change.

4. Strategic foresight ─ A multidimensional approach helps executives develop strategic foresight by considering various perspectives and dimensions of their business. It allows them to anticipate potential future scenarios, identify emerging trends and opportunities, and make proactive decisions. This foresight is crucial for staying ahead of the competition and driving sustainable growth.

By embracing a multidimensional approach, executives can better navigate the complexities of the present and prepare their organizations for the challenges and opportunities of the future. It enables them to be agile, resilient, and forward-thinking, which are essential qualities in today’s rapidly evolving business environment.

A Kaleidoscopic Lens for Holistic Decision-Making

In the heart of Denmark lies an architectural marvel that offers a sweeping view of the city of Aarhus—the ARoS Aarhus Kunstmuseum and its iconic rooftop panorama. Like the myriad colors that fill its circular walkway, representing various shades and perspectives, the RoundMap Panoptic lays out 48 Thinking Caps. These ‘caps’ or viewpoints, much like the hues at ARoS, offer a comprehensive vantage point for decision-making.

Just as no single color can capture the essence of the world below the rooftop, no single perspective can fully encapsulate the complexities of today’s business landscape. By engaging with multiple lenses, we learn to appreciate the shades, nuances, and subtleties that might go unnoticed. The RoundMap Panoptic is your rooftop over the world of enterprise, offering a 360-degree, multi-colored view for holistic decision-making that is as equitable as it is effective.



https://tinyurl.com/mrdyemeb


пятница, 31 января 2025 г.

Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart 's Business Model Framework

 


Short description of framework: A framework illustrating how value is created and captured by an organization through the decisions made and the resulting consequences, illustrated in causal loops.

Main strengths: The framework captures what an organization is trying to do, key values the management wants to create, and the incentives for suppliers, partners, and customers. It also illustrates if management is stringent in its decisions and if different choices results in consequences that reinforce each other or not.

Background
Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart based their framework on the four major categories common to most business model definitions uncovered by Shafer, Smith and Linder in their article The Power of Business Models, from 2005.

Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart argue that “consistent with the intuitive view of the concept, a business model is defined by strategic choices, sometimes made by a network of organizations, that explain value creation and value capture by the focal organization” and conclude that one important component of business models are the concrete choices made by management. To connect the choices to value creation and value capture, Casadesus-Masanell and Ricard include consequences in their definition of a business model.


Framework details
Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart define the business model as (i) the set choices and (ii) the set of consequences derirved from those choices. They distinguish between three different types of choices: policies, assets, and governance. Consequences are classified into flexible and rigid.

  • Policies (Choices) Choices regarding the courses of action adopted by the firm regarding all aspects of its operation
    • Assets (Choices) Choices regarding tangible resources such as manufacturing facilities.
    • Governance (Choices) Choices regarding the structure of contractual arrangements that confer decision rights regarding policies or assets.
    • Flexible (Consequences) Consequences that are sensitive to the choices that generate it
    • Rigid (Consequences) Consequences that does not change rapidly with the choices that generate it.

    Example using the framework

    Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart uses a causal loop diagram, linking choices and consequences by arrows, to represent a business model. As one could make the effort of listing every choice made by management and all consequences of those choices Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart realizes the impracticality and reduces their business model framework to represent (i) choices (generally a subset of all choices), (ii) consequences (generally a subset of all consequences), and (iii) theories. The third element are suppositions on how choices and consequences are related, not a part of the business model, but theories of causality that are believed to be true by the business model designer or analyst.

    In the example below Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart illustrates the business model of Ryanair using bold and underlined to indicate choices, with rigid consequences in boxes, and flexible consequences in plain text.




    Tools for using the framework:

    • Gliffy and other diagram software

    Related publications of interest:

    • Linder, J., & Cantrell, S. (2000). Changing business models: Surveying the landscape. Accenture Institute for Strategic Change
    • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2007). Competing through Business Models. Working paper.
    • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. (2010). From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics. Long Range Planning .
    • Seelos, C. (2010). Theorizing and Strategizing with Models: Generative Models of Business Models. Working paper . Barcelona, Spain.


    https://tinyurl.com/ymc3n7zk

    среда, 25 декабря 2024 г.

    RoundMap® : Framework 24 Shifts

     


    Transformative Journeys: 24 Shifts to Shape the Future of Organizations

     In recognizing the imperatives of change within the contemporary business landscape, the emergence of RoundMap® stands as a beacon of innovation. Serving as a comprehensive framework, RoundMap® guides businesses through a transformative journey, challenging and reshaping traditional paradigms. As we delve into the following insights, each representing a pivotal transition, we gain a panoramic view of the shifts necessary to construct the vibrant organizations that will define the landscape of tomorrow. These insights, cultivated during the creation of RoundMap, illuminate the path toward adaptability, resilience, and sustained success in a rapidly evolving business world.

     

    Key Insights for Building Vibrant Organizations:

     

    Business Model

    1. As-a-Product → As-a-Service → As-a-Platform

     The shift from “as-a-product” to “as-a-service” marks a significant transformation in the business landscape, and as we navigate the Business Model Matrix, there’s an intriguing evolution beyond—entering the realm of “as-a-platform.” Initially, businesses offer products, creating a tangible and discrete value proposition. Progressing into the service domain, the focus shifts to providing ongoing value and experiences. However, the journey doesn’t conclude here. The transition to “as-a-platform” takes the business model to a higher level on the matrix. Now, it’s not just about delivering a service; it’s about cultivating an ecosystem. Businesses evolve into dynamic platforms, allowing users to tailor and expand their experiences. The platform becomes a foundation for innovation, enabling users to integrate diverse functionalities or even develop their solutions within the provided framework. This strategic progression from product to service and finally to platform not only aligns with the Business Model Matrix but also signifies a paradigm shift toward more interactive, customizable, and engaging business models.

      

    Business Strategy


    2. Product-centric → Customer-centric → Community-centric

     The transition from a product-centric to a customer-centric and onward to a community-centric approach represents a strategic evolution in how businesses cultivate relationships and deliver value. Shifting from a product-centric standpoint, which emphasizes individual offerings, the customer-centric model acknowledges and caters to the specific needs of the customer. However, the progression towards community-centricity expands the scope even further. In a community-centric approach, businesses recognize that their audience forms interconnected communities with shared interests, values, and aspirations. The focus shifts from transactional interactions to building a sense of belonging and collaboration within these communities. This advanced stage involves actively engaging with and contributing to the broader community, fostering a two-way relationship where businesses not only address individual customer needs but also play a role in the collective experiences and aspirations of the community. By adopting a community-centric mindset, businesses position themselves as integral parts of a larger ecosystem, fostering loyalty, advocacy, and a deeper sense of connection among their audience.

     

    Connection

     3. Transactional → Relational → Communal

     The shift from transactional to relational to communal represents a strategic evolution in how businesses cultivate connections with their customers. Initially, the transactional approach focuses on individual transactions, emphasizing short-term exchanges and one-off interactions. Recognizing the limitations of this model, the transition to a relational paradigm unfolds, where businesses seek to build longer-term connections and understand the unique preferences and needs of individual customers. Moving beyond individual relationships, the next step is communal engagement. Businesses recognize the value of forming partnerships with customers, engaging them in co-creation processes, and involving them as active contributors to the value circle. This communal approach extends beyond traditional customer-supplier dynamics, transforming customers into valued partners. The formation of communities emerges as a natural progression, where customers not only engage in collaborative problem-solving but also provide valuable feedback and insights, shaping the direction of product development and innovation. This shift from transactional to relational to communal underscores the importance of building meaningful, two-way connections that go beyond transactions to create a mutually beneficial and dynamic ecosystem.

     

    Culture

    4. Open Dialogue → Psychological Safety → Collaborative Trust

      The evolution of workplace dynamics unfolds as a journey from Dialogue to Psychological Safety and, ultimately, to Collaborative Trust. Commencing with a foundation of open communication, organizations lay the groundwork for fostering a culture where ideas and opinions are freely expressed. As this communication evolves, the focus shifts to establishing psychological safety, creating an environment where employees feel secure to take interpersonal risks, share innovative thoughts, and contribute without fear of retribution. The progression culminates in collaborative trust, signifying a workplace culture where mutual trust is deeply embedded, encouraging seamless collaboration and collective innovation. This strategic sequence not only encourages employees to speak out but also nurtures a collaborative and trusting environment that is conducive to sustained creativity and success.

     

    Customer Value

    5. Relevant → Significant → Sustainable

     In the evolving landscape of value creation, the progression from relevance to significance and, ultimately, sustainability marks a strategic transformation. Initially, businesses strive to be relevant by addressing immediate needs and providing solutions that meet present demands. As organizations advance, the focus shifts to significance, recognizing the importance of creating a lasting and meaningful impact that extends beyond the immediate transactional relationship. This involves anticipating and fulfilling future needs, building enduring connections, and contributing positively to the broader context. The pinnacle of this evolution is sustainability, where businesses embrace practices that ensure long-term viability and positive contributions to society and the environment. Sustainability goes beyond short-term gains, emphasizing responsible practices, ethical considerations, and a commitment to leaving a positive legacy. This strategic shift aligns businesses with the imperative of not just being relevant and significant but also ensuring sustained positive influence and responsibility for the well-being of future generations.

     

    Decision-Making

    6. Centralized → Consensus → Consent

     The evolution in decision-making processes reflects a transition from a top-down approach to consensus-building and, now, advancing toward consent-based decision-making. Initially, decisions were traditionally made at the top echelons of the hierarchy, with a clear chain of command and authority. As organizations embraced a more collaborative approach, consensus-building emerged, emphasizing the importance of collective input and agreement among stakeholders. However, the journey doesn’t end here. The current trajectory points toward a consent-based model, where decisions are made with the active consent of those involved. This approach goes beyond mere agreement; it seeks the explicit endorsement and buy-in of all relevant parties, fostering a more inclusive, transparent, and participatory decision-making culture. The shift from top-down to consensus and now towards consent-based decision-making signifies a commitment to shared responsibility, empowerment, and alignment with the values and perspectives of all stakeholders involved in the decision-making process.

     

    Evolution

    7. Continuation → Adaptation → Innovation

     The evolution from continuation to adaptation and innovation encapsulates a strategic approach to organizational development. Initially, in the continuation phase, organizations maintain existing practices, ensuring stability in their operations. The subsequent shift to adaptation represents a proactive response to challenges, emphasizing flexibility and the ability to adjust without undergoing radical transformations. This intermediate phase serves as a bridge, preparing the ground for a more profound shift toward a culture of innovation. In the innovation phase, the organization actively seeks and embraces change, viewing it not just as a response to challenges but as a constant driver for improvement and advancement. This progression signifies a deliberate and gradual evolution, navigating from the comfort of business as usual through the adaptability of change, toward a culture where innovation becomes an integral part of the organizational DNA, driving continuous improvement.

     

    Execution

    8. Excel → Excellence → Elevation

     The pathway from “excel” through “excellence” to “elevation” encapsulates an organization’s strategic advancement. Initially, the focus is on excelling—surpassing others through high performance and skill in specific areas, with a commitment to continuous improvement. This phase is about the dedication to becoming the best, laying the groundwork for the next stage: excellence. Here, the aim is to refine processes for higher proficiency, embodying operational perfection. Ultimately, the journey leads to elevation, where innovation and a visionary approach signify breaking new ground, underpinned by a culture of transformative growth and learning, redefining organizational performance standards.

     

    Fulfillment

    9. Customer Service → Customer Success → Customer Empowerment

     In the trajectory from customer service to customer success, a pivotal stage often involves customer experience optimization. This step is marked by a dedicated effort to refine and enhance every touchpoint, ensuring a positive and seamless journey for customers. Building upon customer success, the evolutionary path extends toward customer empowerment. Here, the focus transcends mere success, emphasizing a deeper connection that empowers customers to derive maximum value from products or services independently. Customer empowerment involves providing resources, tools, and knowledge that enable customers to take control of their experience, fostering a sense of autonomy and mastery. This advanced stage signifies a commitment to not just meeting customer needs but empowering them to navigate and maximize the value of the products or services, contributing to a more sustainable and mutually beneficial customer-business relationship.

     

    Governance

    10. Shareholder Value → Stakeholder Value → Stewardship

     The transformative journey in governance unfolds as a progression from a focus on shareholder value to embracing stakeholder value and ultimately culminating in a paradigm of stewardship. In the traditional context of shareholder value, businesses primarily prioritize short-term profits and cater to the interests of shareholders. Recognizing the limitations of this approach, the evolution advances toward stakeholder value, acknowledging the importance of balancing the needs and expectations of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, partners, and the broader community. However, the journey doesn’t conclude here. The visionary destination is stewardship, where businesses not only consider the impact on stakeholders but also take a proactive role in shaping a positive and sustainable influence on society and the environment. Stewardship goes beyond immediate interests and profit motives, focusing on creating enduring value and contributing to the well-being of both present and future generations. This strategic shift from shareholder value to stakeholder value and ultimately to stewardship reflects a commitment to responsible and impactful business practices, aligning purpose with long-term societal and environmental goals.

     

    Hiring

    11. Functions → Roles → Competencies

     The evolution in hiring practices has traversed a trajectory from rigid functions to dynamic roles and, subsequently, into a competency-driven paradigm. Initially, organizations adhered to specific functions and predefined roles when building their teams. However, recognizing the multidimensional nature of individual capabilities, the focus has shifted towards competencies—a holistic approach encompassing diverse skills, abilities, and attributes. This shift acknowledges that individuals bring a unique blend of talents that transcend conventional role boundaries. Importantly, it signifies a departure from the emphasis solely on qualifications to favoring experience—a nod to the rich, practical insights individuals bring to the table. Moreover, a concurrent trend involves the establishment of skills-based databases, enabling organizations to systematically harvest talent. These databases serve as reservoirs of diverse competencies, allowing businesses to flexibly match individuals with evolving organizational needs. This strategic shift not only emphasizes the dynamic nature of contemporary workplaces but also reflects a commitment to cultivating a workforce that excels based on a broad spectrum of competencies and experiential wisdom, rather than rigidly predefined roles and qualifications.

     

    Leadership

    12. Directive → Collaborative → Empowering

     The evolution in leadership transitions from a centrally directed model, characterized by a top-down (directive) approach where decision-making authority is concentrated at the top, to a more inclusive and participative framework. This shift sees the emergence of collaborative leadership, where decision-making is shared among team members, valuing localized insights and fostering organizational flexibility. Such an approach encourages teams to make more informed and autonomous decisions within a defined framework, leveraging collective intelligence.

    Taking the philosophy of leadership evolution further, we arrive at empowering (often referred to as Servant Leadership). This style disperses decision-making authority even more broadly, emphasizing the empowerment of each individual within the organization. It is rooted in the belief that leaders should serve their teams, prioritizing the personal and professional development of team members above traditional hierarchical mandates. Empowering leadership relies deeply on trust, collaboration, and a unified vision, underlining autonomy, adaptability, and a commitment to serving the greater good.

    This progression from directive to collaborative and finally to empowering leadership reflects a strategic response to the complexities of the modern business environment. It underscores the necessity for leadership approaches that are not only inclusive and participative but also fundamentally oriented towards empowering individuals. Such approaches are crucial for navigating the dynamic and rapidly evolving landscapes of today’s world, ensuring that organizations remain agile, resilient, and capable of fostering continuous innovation.

    Mission

    13. Profit-driven → Purpose-driven → Planned Impact

     The evolution in the mission and strategic orientation of businesses unfolds as a progression from a profit-driven focus to embracing a purpose-driven approach and ultimately reaching a stage of planned impact. In the profit-driven paradigm, organizations prioritize financial gains as the primary measure of success. Acknowledging the need for a more holistic and meaningful existence, the transition moves towards a purpose-driven focus. Here, businesses articulate a shared purpose that extends beyond profit, emphasizing the positive contributions they aspire to make to society, the environment, or other meaningful causes. However, recognizing that a purpose alone may remain aspirational without tangible results, the trajectory advances toward planned impact. This strategic phase involves systematic planning, measurement, and reporting of the impact created by the organization. By setting specific, measurable, and sustainable goals aligned with their purpose, businesses move beyond rhetoric to concrete actions, ensuring that their mission translates into meaningful outcomes. The shift from profit-driven to purpose-driven and finally to planned impact reflects a commitment to articulating values and actively working towards creating a lasting and positive influence on the world.

     

     

    Organizational Development

    14. Weaknesses → Strengths → Sustained Growth

     The organizational evolution from mitigating or eliminating weaknesses to identifying and aligning strengths, and ultimately embracing growth, represents a strategic shift in mindset. In the initial phase, organizations diligently address weaknesses or problems, aiming to minimize vulnerabilities and challenges. As the progression unfolds, there’s a pivot towards recognizing and aligning with strengths, acknowledging that cultivating excellence in proficient areas forms a solid foundation. Simultaneously, the organization transitions from merely solving problems to identifying opportunities, where strengths are strategically aligned to explore and capitalize on emerging possibilities. The ultimate stage is a commitment to proactive growth, where the organization not only addresses weaknesses and seizes opportunities but actively develops and maximizes its potential. This holistic approach involves leveraging strengths to navigate challenges, capitalizing on opportunities, and proactively shaping a future of sustained growth and innovation.

     

    Progression

    15. Linear → Non-Linear → Cyclical

     At the heart of RoundMap® lies a transformative evolution from a linear operational approach, solely focused on improving results, to an integrated and cyclical operation that prioritizes increasing impact. This fundamental shift, encapsulated in RoundMap’s® name, highlights the incorporation of an intermediate step—integration—where the business processes and strategies are harmonized for a more cohesive and interconnected operation. Research consistently demonstrates the power of closing the loop, incorporating feedback, and embracing continuous learning from each cycle. By adopting this integrated and cyclical mindset, businesses can harness the insights gained to create more value, foster greater loyalty, and drive higher customer and employee engagement levels. RoundMap® emphasizes the importance of feedback loops, enabling businesses to adapt and refine their strategies and operations, ultimately leading to increased profitability and sustainable growth. By embracing this critical aspect of RoundMap®, businesses can propel themselves toward a more impactful and prosperous future.

     

    Resilience

    16. Fitness → Agility → Vitality

     In navigating a VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous) world, the fitness, agility, and vitality sequence represents a strategic progression for firms to enhance their resilience. Initially, achieving organizational fitness involves optimizing core capabilities and operational efficiency, ensuring a solid foundation. As the environment becomes more volatile and uncertain, the focus transitions to agility, emphasizing the ability to adapt swiftly to changing circumstances, seize emerging opportunities, and navigate unexpected challenges. Agility enables organizations to respond with flexibility and speed in the face of unpredictability. However, recognizing that adaptability alone may not suffice, the pursuit of vitality emerges as the next stage. Vitality encompasses a proactive and forward-thinking approach, involving continuous innovation, learning, and the cultivation of a culture that thrives on change. It goes beyond mere adaptability, emphasizing the proactive creation of new opportunities and the ability to shape the environment rather than merely responding to it.

     

    Structure (Horizontal)

    17. Silos → Integration → Whole System

     The transition from siloed operations to integration and, ultimately, the incorporation and consideration of the whole system signifies a profound shift in organizational dynamics. While integration emphasizes breaking down silos and fostering collaboration among diverse components, the move towards the whole system goes beyond mere integration. It involves recognizing the interconnectedness of all organizational elements and considering their collective impact on the broader system. This advanced stage not only enhances diversity of thought but also propels creativity, innovation, resilience, and vitality to unprecedented levels. By incorporating a holistic perspective, organizations not only break down internal barriers but also consider external factors, stakeholders, and the broader environment. This comprehensive approach cultivates a culture where ideas flow freely, diverse perspectives are valued, and innovation thrives. Consequently, organizations become more than just adaptable and resilient; they attain a vitality derived from the profound interconnectedness and collaboration inherent in considering the entire system.

     

    Structure (Vertical)

    18. Hierarchy → Matrix → Holon

     The transition from Hierarchies to Matrices and ultimately to Holons represents a transformative journey in organizational structure. Initially structured in a hierarchical form, organizations follow a clear chain of command with well-defined roles and responsibilities. Recognizing the limitations of hierarchies, the transition to Matrices introduces a more dynamic model where teams collaborate across traditional boundaries, enhancing communication and flexibility. This intermediate step acknowledges the need for increased collaboration and cross-functional interaction. The final stage is the adoption of Holons, where entities operate both autonomously and collaboratively, reflecting a more decentralized and self-organizing structure. Holons allow for a balance between autonomy and integration, promoting adaptability and responsiveness in a complex and dynamic environment. Notably, the concept of Holons has inspired innovative approaches like the Constellation of Teams in Consentricity, emphasizing interconnected and self-organizing teams within the broader organizational framework. This shift from Hierarchies to Matrices to Holons reflects a progression toward more agile, interconnected, and resilient organizational structures.

     

    Talent Development

    19. Motivated → Empowered → Synergized

     The evolution of talent development, progressing from Motivated to Empowered and ultimately to Synergized, marks a strategic journey in unleashing the full potential of individuals within an organization. Motivating individuals involves tapping into their drives and aspirations and aligning them with organizational goals. As the evolution unfolds, the focus shifts to empowerment, granting individuals the autonomy, resources, and support needed to take ownership of their roles and contribute meaningfully. The pinnacle of this progression is Synergized talent, where the collective collaboration and harmonization of individual strengths lead to a dynamic synergy that transcends individual capabilities. In this stage, the organization becomes greater than the sum of its parts, fostering an environment where diverse talents complement each other, creativity flourishes, and collective achievements surpass individual accomplishments.

     

    Targeting

    20. Customer Needs → Customer Jobs → Customer Outcomes

     The progression in value creation, from addressing customer needs to understanding the broader context of customer “jobs-to-be-done,” and ultimately delivering specific outcomes, represents a strategic evolution. Initially, businesses focus on identifying and understanding the specific needs customers have within a given context. Moving further along the progression, the next stage involves comprehending the customer’s job, understanding the broader objectives or tasks they are trying to accomplish. This expanded perspective allows for a more holistic understanding of customer requirements. The ultimate goal is to provide not just products or services that fulfill needs or jobs but to deliver specific and impactful outcomes. This shift to outcomes requires a nuanced understanding of the desired results or benefits that customers seek when utilizing a product or service to accomplish a particular job. By aligning value creation with these ultimate outcomes, businesses can deepen their understanding and more effectively meet customer expectations, contributing to long-term satisfaction and loyalty.

     

    Technology

    21. Assisted → Augmented → Autonomous

     The evolution of technology has traversed a remarkable path, progressing from merely assisting human activities to augmenting them with advanced capabilities. In the next frontier, we envision a stage characterized by autonomous intelligence. Here, technology not only provides assistance and augmentation but operates with a heightened level of autonomy, leveraging sophisticated artificial intelligence and machine learning. This phase involves intelligent systems making independent decisions, guided by predefined rules and learning algorithms that adapt to dynamic contexts. The transition to autonomous technology represents a future where human-machine collaboration is seamlessly enhanced, offering not just assistance and augmentation but a more proactive, self-directed role for technology in various domains. This trajectory reflects a paradigm shift toward a new era of technological evolution, promising deeper integration and collaboration between human and machine intelligence.

     

    Value Orchestration

    22. Value Chains → Value Networks → Value Circles

     The evolutionary shift in value orchestration progresses from value chains to value streams, further expanding into value networks and ultimately culminating in value circles. Initially, the value chain concept focuses on the sequential steps in the production or service delivery process, creating a linear path. The evolution then advances to value streams, recognizing the flow of value across various processes and emphasizing efficiency and coordination. Building upon this, the evolution extends to value networks, acknowledging the importance of external relationships, partnerships, and collaboration in the value creation process. Finally, value circles signify a continuous, adaptive, and holistic approach to value creation, emphasizing ongoing feedback and collaboration, with a seamless integration of internal and external stakeholders. This progressive shift reflects a departure from linear and isolated models toward more interconnected and dynamic orchestrations of value.

     

    Value Proposition

    23. Features → Experiences → Emotional Resonance

     The evolution in value proposition emphasis follows a deliberate trajectory, starting with the communication of product features. Initially, the narrative centers on highlighting specific functionalities, providing a detailed exposition of the offering’s capabilities. As the story unfolds, the focus seamlessly shifts towards articulating how the product creates meaningful experiences, recognizing the intrinsic value and benefits it provides. This pivotal transition sets the stage for the ultimate destination—crafting a compelling narrative that goes beyond features and experiences to establish emotional resonance. Here, storytelling becomes the central means to frame the proposition within a broader context, acknowledging the profound influence of emotional resonance and overall narrative cohesion in shaping the audience’s perception. This strategic progression, from Features to Experiences and ultimately to Emotional Resonance through StoryCasting, marks a nuanced and holistic approach that transcends technical details to create a resonant and captivating story around the product or proposition.

     

    Workforce

    24. Specialist → T-shaped → Polymath

     The evolution from a specialist to a T-shaped professional and, ultimately, a polymath represents a transformative journey in shaping one’s expertise and perspective. Beginning as a specialist, individuals focus intensely on acquiring in-depth knowledge and skills within a specific domain. The progression then leads to a T-shaped professional, where the vertical bar of the ‘T’ symbolizes their deep expertise, while the horizontal bar represents a broader understanding across related disciplines. As the journey continues, the ultimate destination is polymathy, characterized by a wealth of knowledge spanning diverse domains. A polymath possesses not only deep expertise but also a breadth of perspective, enabling them to draw insights and connections from various fields. This evolution underscores the importance of not only specialized proficiency but also a holistic and interdisciplinary approach, reflecting a dynamic shift in how expertise is cultivated and applied in today’s interconnected world.

     

    Navigating Strategic Transitions: Insights from RoundMap®

     In recognizing the dynamic and complex nature of the contemporary business landscape, the shifts and transitions outlined here have emerged as key considerations during the creation of RoundMap®. However, it’s important to emphasize that these transitions are not exclusive to RoundMap®; rather, they reflect broader trends and evolving strategies in various organizations. The identified shifts span diverse dimensions, ranging from business models, strategies, and organizational structures to leadership styles, talent development, and customer interactions. As entities venture through these strategic progressions, RoundMap® offers a guiding framework to navigate these transformative journeys. Whether it’s the evolution from product-centric to people-centric strategies, the transition from hierarchical structures to consentric organizations, or the shift towards consent-based decision-making, these trends mirror the ongoing evolution in the business world. RoundMap® serves not only as a reflection of these shifts but also as a proactive tool to help organizations strategically navigate, adapt, and innovate in the ever-changing landscape of contemporary business.

     

     https://tinyurl.com/4styyc5n