пятница, 7 августа 2026 г.

What is Management? What Every Manager Needs to Know

 


Discover the pivotal role management plays in organizational success! Learn how effective managers drive team performance, foster growth, and align day-to-day activities with long-term goals.

Ben Kill, Chartered MCIPD


Summary

  • Management is the coordination and administration of tasks to achieve organizational goals, requiring skills in planning, communication, organization, and leadership.


  • Effective managers excel in five key functions: planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and developing people, ensuring smooth operations and continuous improvement.


  • Essential management skills include technical expertise, human relations abilities, and conceptual understanding, with various management styles catering to different team dynamics and organizational needs. 


Workplaces thrive on the strength of their managers. After all, managers not only direct employees and teams, but also communicate with senior professionals to meet goals and advance the company’s mission. And while the specific duties of managers vary across industries, most share a variety of basic responsibilities.

The problem is that many managers (both new and old) never get a chance to stand back and really reflect on what it is they do and how they can do it better.

As managers deal in both long-term goals and day-to-day activities, they need to be aware of the organization's environment. This is what allows them to spot opportunities for growth and improvement. All the while, they need to be able to manage the relationship between the employees they oversee and the business that employs them.

In short: it’s no small job. In this article, we’ll talk about the type of people it takes to fill those managerial shoes. 

What is Management?

Management involves the coordination and administration of tasks to achieve a goal. It’s a simple definition, but it’s by no means a simple thing to accomplish in practice. As we’ve already mentioned, being a manager requires skills in planning, communication, organization, and leadership. But a good manager also needs to understand complex concepts like resource utilization and specialized abilities such as being able to adapt to changing environments and technology. Unfortunately, too many managers (especially in the modern workforce), are promoted without ever getting a chance to understand the fundamentals.

The Five Functions of Management

As we’ve already discussed, most managers have much broader and more complex responsibilities than many people know. Back in the 1800s, a mining engineer and businessman named Henri Fayol identified five unique functions of management. And despite the passage of nearly 200 years, these still hold up today.

1. Planning


One of the primary roles of a manager is to create a plan to meet company goals and objectives. This means properly allocating employee resources, delegating responsibilities, and setting realistic timelines and standards. Managers are responsible for continuously checking on team progress to make necessary adjustments while maintaining a clear picture of the company’s larger aims. Planning involves working independently to determine task responsibilities, setting priorities, and creating timelines. That said, communication is also crucial, as managers meet with company leadership to discuss goals and communicate project specifics to their team.

Effective planning requires that managers anticipate future needs and prepare for potential obstacles. This means analyzing data, forecasting trends, and developing contingency plans to address any unforeseen challenges. Even back in the late 1800s, Fayol was adamant that managers should involve their team members in the planning process to foster a sense of ownership and commitment to the project’s success.

2. Organizing


Henri Fayol was very clear that a manager should possess organizational skills that ensure smooth operation within their given company or department. He stated that this involves establishing internal processes and structures to facilitate day-to-day activities as well as identifying which employees or teams are best suited for specific tasks. In his eyes, managers should delegate tasks efficiently, ensure employees have what they need, and reorganize in response to new challenges. This “reorganization” could include everything from adjusting project timelines and reallocating tasks to altering team structures in response to company growth.

Organizing also includes managing resources such as time, money, and materials. Back then, as with today, managers need to learn how to balance these resources effectively to maximize productivity and achieve the desired outcomes. At the same time, they need to create clear workflows and communication channels to ensure that everyone understands their roles and responsibilities. By fostering a well-organized work environment, managers can minimize confusion, reduce inefficiencies, and enhance overall team performance.

3. Leading


There’s no shortage of articles about leadership nowadays. But back in his day, Henri Fayol’s definitions were pretty revolutionary. He stated that managers should confidently command their team’s daily tasks and guide them through significant changes or challenges. The way he saw it, leadership involves setting goals, communicating new processes, and handling conflicts fairly. Good leaders recognize when employees need reinforcement and praise, and managers often function as leaders during small interactions by modeling supportive, encouraging, and motivational behaviors.

Of course, leadership extends beyond giving orders; it encompasses inspiring and motivating the team to achieve their best. To that point, effective leaders build trust and respect within their team by demonstrating integrity, empathy, and consistency. It’s their job to create a positive work culture where employees feel supported and valued for their contributions. By providing clear direction and encouraging open communication, managers can foster collaboration and innovation. Finally, Fayol believed that leadership involves recognizing and addressing individual strengths and weaknesses, which can help team members develop their skills and advance in their careers.

4. Controlling


Henri Fayol believed that managers need to consistently monitor employee performance, work quality, and project efficiency. Control in management ensures that business goals are met and necessary changes are made when they aren't. This means paying close attention to quality control and making any adjustments required to keep the company on track.
Controlling also involves setting performance standards, measuring actual performance, and taking corrective action when necessary. In that way, managers should establish clear benchmarks and metrics to evaluate progress and identify areas for improvement. Frequent performance reviews help to guarantee accountability and ensure that employees understand expectations. By addressing issues promptly and providing constructive feedback, managers can foster continuous improvement and maintain high standards of quality and productivity.

5. Developing People


Last but certainly not least, good managers invest in their staff’s development by setting career goals and coaching team members to recognize strengths and improve performance. Fayol believed that managers needed to develop their leadership skills in order to be effective supervisors, regardless of their personal management style.

Today, we know that investing in employee development leads to higher job satisfaction, increased productivity, and lower turnover rates. That’s why managers should create opportunities for professional growth through training programs, mentorship, and challenging assignments. By supporting their team’s development, managers can build a much more capable and motivated workforce.

Essential Management Skills

To be successful in planning, organizing, leading, controlling, and people development, managers need to acquire and develop a plethora of skills. These skills fall into three basic categories: technical, human relations, and conceptual skills. Meanwhile, the level of a manager’s position often determines the degree to which each type of skill is used.

Technical Skills


Technical skills involve specialized knowledge and expertise. Modern examples include preparing financial statements, programming computers, designing buildings, and analyzing market research. These skills are vital for supervisory managers who work closely with employees producing goods or services.

Technical skills enable managers to understand the specific tasks and processes their team members are working on. However, as managers advance in their careers, they may rely less on technical skills and more on strategic and leadership abilities. Nevertheless, maintaining a solid understanding of technical aspects can enhance credibility and effectiveness in managing teams.

Human Relations Skills


Human relations skills are those interpersonal skills that help managers accomplish goals through human resources. These include understanding human behavior, communicating effectively, and figuring out how to properly motivate different individuals. Good human relations skills also involve giving positive feedback, being sensitive to individual needs, and empowering subordinates. Managers with strong people skills are often able to avoid an authoritarian style and foster a more collaborative work environment.

Building strong relationships helps to create a positive work environment. This is why managers should strive to be approachable, empathetic, and supportive. Doing so helps to create an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect. By fostering open dialogue and collaboration, managers can address issues promptly and create a more engaged and motivated workforce.

Conceptual Skills


Conceptual skills allow managers to view the organization as a whole, understand how parts are interdependent, and assess the organization’s relationship with its external environment. These skills are particularly essential for top-level managers involved in strategic planning.

Indeed, conceptual skills help managers to think critically and solve complex problems. Such skills are particularly important for senior managers who need to make long-term decisions that impact the entire organization. By understanding the broader context and how different elements interact, managers can create strategies that drive growth and success.

Common Management Styles

There are several effective management styles, and no single style is best. Managers can select elements from different styles to create the best approach for their team and company.

Persuasive Management Style

Persuasive managers spend time with their team members, leading by example and gaining buy-in through persuasion rather than instruction. In that way, they stay engaged with employees and are aware of their daily work. This style of management fosters a sense of trust and collaboration. Persuasive managers build strong relationships with their team members, making employees feel valued and respected. By involving employees in decision-making and explaining the rationale behind decisions, persuasive managers can increase buy-in and commitment to organizational goals. This leads to increased motivation and job satisfaction, as employees feel more connected to the organization’s success.

Democratic Management Style

Democratic managers directly involve their teams in decision-making. This tendency toward open communication allows managers to understand each employee’s skills and contributions, encouraging participation and idea exchange. Stlll, managers also need to streamline decision-making processes to avoid sluggishness.

Democratic management creates a collaborative environment where employees can freely share their opinions and ideas. This inclusivity can lead to more innovative solutions and better decision-making. However, managers need to establish clear guidelines for decision-making to prevent delays and inefficiencies. By balancing inclusivity with efficiency, democratic managers can create a productive and engaged workforce.

Laissez-Faire Management Style

Laissez-faire managers act as mentors, empowering employees to make decisions and take ownership of projects. They will frequently step in to offer advice or correct issues, but otherwise allow employees to work independently.

This hands-off approach tends to foster both creativity and autonomy, allowing employees to develop their skills and take initiative. Laissez-faire managers provide support and guidance when needed, but generally trust their team to manage their responsibilities, leading to increased job satisfaction and innovation. However, it’s important to note that this style of management requires a team of self-motivated and capable individuals who can work independently.

Authoritative Management Style

Authoritative leaders make quick decisions without feedback, which is often suitable for urgent situations. However, it’s important to note that an over-reliance on this style can lead to high turnover and stalled innovation. Authoritative leaders provide clear direction and expect compliance, ensuring that decisions are implemented quickly and efficiently. Still, over time, this approach can create a rigid and hierarchical work environment, leading to decreased employee morale and engagement. Fortunately, balancing authoritative decisions with inclusive practices can help mitigate these risks and maintain a positive work culture.

Coaching Management Style

Coaching managers see potential in employees and help them grow. This tends to build strong teams and helps create a comfortable environment for experimentation. That said, some employees may feel neglected without clear, mentored direction.

Coaching managers need to provide regular feedback, set challenging goals, and offer support to help employees achieve their full potential. This fosters a learning-oriented culture where employees feel encouraged to take risks and innovate. However, managers must balance coaching with providing clear direction to ensure that employees remain focused and productive.

Transformational Management Style

Transformational managers prioritize innovation and growth, encouraging employees to reach their full potential. This style leads to happy, dedicated workers. However, it requires a certain amount of adaptability to change. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their teams by creating a vision for the future and encouraging innovation. They focus on long-term goals and encourage employees to think creatively. This can help increase both performance and job satisfaction, as employees feel motivated to contribute to the organization’s success.

Visionary Management Style

Visionary leaders ensure everyone understands the company’s vision and works toward a common goal. They tend to be excellent communicators and give employees autonomy to execute the vision effectively.
Visionary managers need to communicate the company’s goals clearly and inspire employees to work toward a shared purpose. By providing autonomy and trust, visionary managers empower their teams to take ownership of their work and contribute to the organization’s success. This approach fosters a strong sense of purpose.

Management Frequently Asked Quetions

What is management?

Management involves the coordination and administration of tasks to achieve organizational goals. It requires skills in planning, communication, organization, and leadership to effectively manage resources and guide teams.

What are the five functions of management?

The five functions of management, as identified by Henri Fayol, are:

  • Planning: Creating plans to meet company goals, allocating resources, delegating responsibilities, and setting timelines.
  • Organizing: Establishing internal processes and structures, managing resources, and ensuring smooth operations.
  • Leading: Guiding and motivating teams, setting goals, and handling conflicts.
  • Controlling: Monitoring performance, quality control, and making necessary adjustments.
  • Developing People: Investing in employee development, setting career goals, and coaching team members.

What skills are essential for effective management?

Effective managers need a combination of:

  • Technical skills: Specialized knowledge and expertise in specific tasks.
  • Human relations skills: Interpersonal skills to motivate and manage teams.
  • Conceptual skills: The ability to view the organization as a whole and understand its interdependencies.


What are common management styles?


Common management styles include:

  • Persuasive: Leading by example and gaining buy-in through persuasion.
  • Democratic: Involving teams in decision-making.
  • Laissez-Faire: Empowering employees to make decisions and work independently.
  • Authoritative: Making quick decisions without feedback.
  • Coaching: Helping employees grow and develop their potential.
  • Transformational: Encouraging innovation and growth.
  • Visionary: Ensuring everyone understands and works towards the company’s vision.


Why is planning important in management?

Planning is crucial because it involves setting goals, allocating resources, and creating timelines to ensure that organizational objectives are met. It helps managers anticipate future needs and prepare for potential obstacles.

How does effective organizing contribute to management success?

Effective organizing ensures that internal processes and structures are in place to facilitate day-to-day activities. It involves delegating tasks efficiently, managing resources, and creating clear workflows to maximize productivity and achieve desired outcomes.

What role does leadership play in management?

Leadership involves guiding and motivating teams, setting goals, and handling conflicts. Effective leaders build trust and respect, create a positive work culture, and inspire employees to achieve their best.

What is the significance of controlling in management?

Controlling ensures that business goals are met by monitoring performance, quality, and efficiency. It involves setting performance standards, measuring actual performance, and taking corrective action when necessary.

How can managers develop their team members effectively?

Managers can develop their team members by setting career goals, providing training and mentorship, and offering opportunities for professional growth. Investing in employee development leads to higher job satisfaction, increased productivity, and lower turnover rates.

What are the benefits of understanding different management styles?

Understanding different management styles allows managers to adapt their approach based on team dynamics and organizational needs. It helps in creating a positive work environment, improving employee engagement, and achieving better results.


https://tinyurl.com/3u7r4373

среда, 29 июля 2026 г.

Практикум Партнерських Домовленостей. Частини 7 - 8.

 








👑 Я співвласник, всі питання тільки через мене❗️

До мене звернувся партнер с проблемою того, що один з його партнерів в колективі поводить себе як єдиний власник:

🔺 позиціонує себе як той без кого не можуть бути вирішені будь які питання

🔺 одночасно по своїй сфері відповідальності не звітує

🔺 напряму роздає вказівки стафу який є у підпорядкуванні інших партнерів.
_________________________________________________

Така ситуація приводить до передбачуваних наслідків :

💥 виникають конфлікти між партнерами

💥 колектив розгублений бо не може дати відсіч співвласнику, коли він стрибає через голову інших партнерів

💥 загальний клімат в компанії далекий від ідеального.
_________________________________________________

Я запитав чи домовлялись вони між собою відносно того хто і як з партнерів може себе позиціювати в колективі?

Відповідь була очікувана: Ні...
_________________________________________________

‼️ Якщо не домовились, то партнер є вільним робити так як вважає прийнятним, а те що в нього не існує відчуття такту, відчуття меж дозволеного ви як аргумент йому не предʼявите.

💡 Як домовитись у відносно того як партнери будуть себе позиціювати у колективі (дивіться зверху)









😈 Гуртове - чортове!

❓По яким питанням партнери повинні приймати рішення разом?

🔴 Визначитись с переліком питань по яким партнери приймають рішення разом важливо на початку партнерських відносин.

🔴 Так само необхідно визначити як такі рішення будуть прийматись: консенсусом, більшістю, у яких випадках?

🔴 чи відображає розмір частки у володінні компанії кількість голосів при голосуванні?

🔴 Який порядок дій у випадку коли хтось із партнерів є незгодним?

🔴 Які питання відносяться до одноосібних повноважень партнерів, або СЕО.

Як домовитись по цим питанням- дивіться зверху.



https://tinyurl.com/4e3jvupb

How to protect your calendar

 



Your calendar isn’t just a schedule; it’s a mirror of your leadership.

Look at it right now. What does it say about you?

Most leaders treat their calendars like an inbox - something to react to.
But the best leaders I know treat theirs like a fortress.
They don’t just manage time; they architect it.

Here’s what I’ve learned: If you don’t guard your calendar, someone else will fill it for you.
And they won’t fill it with your priorities.

The deeper principle behind this isn’t about time management - it’s about decision management.
Every meeting you accept is a decision about what you’re saying no to.
Every block you protect is a statement about what you value.

High-performing leaders understand that focus is a finite resource.
They don’t just filter requests; they filter themselves.
They ask: “Is this the highest and best use of my energy right now?”

One habit I’ve observed among the most effective executives: They review their calendars weekly, not just to plan but to reflect.

They ask:
Did I spend my time on what only I can do?
Where did I let distractions in?
What needs to be redesigned next week?

This isn’t about rigidity.
It’s about intentionality.
It’s about saying yes to what truly moves the needle - and no to everything else with clarity and confidence.

Here’s the hard truth: Busy isn’t a badge of honor. Impact is.
And impact requires space. Space to think. Space to lead. Space to deliver.

So here’s my challenge to you: What will you remove from your calendar this week to make room for what matters most?

Your calendar is your leadership in action.
Protect it like the asset it is.


https://tinyurl.com/eypkhh66

14 mental models worth adding to your toolkit

 




14 mental models worth adding to your toolkit:

A problem solved with the wrong framework stays a problem.
The right one makes the answer obvious.

➤ For simplifying complexity:

↳ Occam's Razor: the simplest explanation that fits the facts is most likely correct.
↳ First Principles: strip the problem to its fundamentals and reason up from there.

➤ For focusing your effort:

↳ 80/20 Rule: 20% of your inputs drive 80% of your outputs. Find that 20%.
↳ Parkinson's Law: work expands to fill the time you give it. Give it less.

➤ For high-stakes decisions:

↳ Inversion: instead of asking how to succeed, ask how to avoid failing.
↳ Second-Order Thinking: consider the downstream effects of every choice.
↳ Regret Minimization: imagine yourself at 90 looking back. Choose what you won't regret.

➤ For escaping mental traps:

↳ Sunk Cost Fallacy: past costs you can't recover shouldn't drive future choices.
↳ Hofstadter's Law: things always take longer than expected, even when you plan for it.
↳ The Spotlight Effect: people are far less focused on you than you think.

➤ For understanding people:

↳ Hanlon's Razor: before assuming malice, check for incompetence first.
↳ Murphy's Law: anything that can go wrong will. Plan for it before it does.

➤ For thinking and learning:

↳ Feynman Technique: if you can't explain it simply, you don't truly understand it.
↳ Hitchens' Razor: what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

The difference between a good decision and a great one is usually the framework you used. Now you have 14.


https://tinyurl.com/2nvj8nsy

7 Growth Pillars Every Business Owner Must Track


Most business owners track revenue.
Smart ones track what creates it.

I've reviewed multiple businesses, and the pattern
is clear:

The ones scaling predictably know exactly where
their leads go at every stage.

They don't just track revenue or vanity numbers.

This breaks down exactly what to measure at each stage
of your customer journey.

From the moment someone discovers you to the point
they become a repeat client.

Review it weekly.

That's 52 chances a year to spot what's working and fix
what's not.

The 7 pillars are:

• Attention: Are people finding you?
• Engage: Are they interested enough to reach out?
• Subscribe: Are they entering your pipeline?
• Consideration: Are they showing up to calls?
• Excite: Are they feeling momentum?
• Convert: Are they actually buying?
• Ascend: Are they coming back and referring others?

Each one has specific metrics you can track weekly.

No guesswork.

No vanity metrics.

Just the numbers that actually move your business forward.

Save this for your next planning session.

Your future self will thank you.


https://tinyurl.com/34t5uvua

вторник, 28 июля 2026 г.

How to improve decision-making at work


Companies are full of people who know what to do...

But have no authority to take action.

Every day, decisions that could take minutes sit in someone's inbox for days.
Meanwhile, team members wait until they get the go-ahead to take action.

We've spent the last decade visiting more than 200 organizations that are doing work differently.

Decisions aren't limited to leaders at the top.

They're distributed to everyone and the whole team has autonomy:

1. Map decision-making
↳ Make an overview of who makes decisions

Customer needs a refund? → Give authority to customer support
Purchasing a new tool? → The elected team representative handles it.
Schedule needs updating? → Let the team decide what works best

Keep this overview visible afterwards

2. Change the language
↳ A practice Captain David Marquet used on the USS Santa Fe to promote initiative-taking.

Swap out passive phrases with active phrases.

"Can I get approval..." → "I intend to..."
"What should I do about..." → "My recommendation is..."
"What do you think we should..." → "I plan to..."
"Can I..." → "I will..."

3. Push authority down
↳ Move decisions down to the lowest capable level.

• Search for procedures that hold people back from making decisions themselves.
• Team leaders specify why they worry about delegating a decision
• Team members respond with why they can take responsibility for it

(Psst. If you want the full method on how to do this, check out our blog: https://lnkd.in/e5WHagjx)

4. Use pre-approval
↳ Set boundaries in advance and then let people act.

A few examples:

• Budget refunds up to $5,000
• Small issues get resolved in 24 hours
• Avoid decisions that affect more than 10% of revenue.

Leaders set the guardrails and employees take ownership within them.

5. Use the advice process
↳ One of the most radical approaches to distributed decision-making.

Anyone can decide anything as long as they get input from the people affected and those who have expertise in that area.

They have to listen. They don't have to agree.

Giving people authority to act on what they know is seen as radical in most companies.

That tells you everything about how broken the default is.

We’ve spent years documenting the organizations changing the norm. And we’re sharing their stories every week in our newsletter.


Work is broken. Let’s fix it.


Credits to Pim de Morree, make sure to follow!

https://tinyurl.com/uat95wdw

The boardroom communication framework

 


I sat through hundreds of Board meetings as a partner at KPMG.

And I watched the same thing happen again and again.

A senior, capable person walks into their slot, opens with "I'll just quickly take you through the work we've done…" and within two minutes, they've lost the room.

Their work is usually good. That's not the problem.

The problem is that Boards don't listen the way most presenters assume.

They're not there for the story. They're scanning for signals:

❓ What's the risk?
❓ Are you on top of it?
❓ What do you actually think?
❓ Do I need to worry?

That's what's running through their heads while you're walking them through your team’s work.

The first minute does most of the heavy lifting.

After that, they're scanning for inconsistencies and signs you're unsure.

Miss your message in the first minute and you spend the rest of the slot recovering.

I built a structure for the leaders I coach.

(It's been battle tested at major financial services companies.)

It’s called CRISP:

✅ Conclusion – lead with the headline

The Board wants your answer before your working.

✅ Risk – name it early

If you bury it, they'll assume you're hiding it, or aren’t aware of it.

✅ Interpretation – give your view, not just the data

They can read numbers themselves.

✅ Signal – tell them where this is heading

Because they're deciding whether to worry or not.

✅ Plan – show that you’ve got it under control

Close the loop on what you're doing about it.

The full process is on the infographic.

Try it before your next Board meeting.

Write one or two sentences for each CRISP element, then time yourself.

You should have a few minutes to present, then let them ask questions.

📌 Save this for your next Board slot


https://tinyurl.com/ynw5z92e

Семь проблем с целями

 


Накопленный (ориентировочно с 2000 по 2005 год) опыт проведения тренингов / коучинга по тайм-менеджменту, позволил мне выделить 7 главных (чаще всего встречающихся) проблем с целями у тех, кто активно занимается собственным саморазвитием:

1. Слишком много целей.
2. Нет приоритетов.
3. Нереалистичность цели.
4. Нет четких временных рамок.
5. Нет измеримости, четких критериев достижения.
6. Конфликтность, противоречивость целей.
7. Цель не связана с мотивацией.


(Сразу хочу сказать, что на сегодняшний день моё понимание проблем целеполагания/целедостижения претерпело некоторые изменения. Об этом - чуть позже… В других заметках :) )

…вообще, поводом для написания данной заметки стали случайно найденные в сети "7 причин по которым не достигаются цели" (http://bit.ly/gOTcVR ). Вот эти семь причин в моем пересказе:

1. Цели нереалистичны, никак не связаны с вашей жизнью. Другими словами, цели никак не совпадает с тем, кем вы являетесь, что вы ежедневно делаете, с вашими устойчивыми привычками, вашим образом жизни, вашим окружением и т.п.

2. Отсутствие непрерывных действий. Любые цели погибают от бездействия. Нужны хотя бы минимальные усилия в направлении цели, но эти усилия нужны каждый день! Составьте список (to-do list) промежуточных задач на пути к цели, и ежедневно выполняйте хотя бы одну из них.

3. Отсутствие обязательств. Многие цели мы ставим не самостоятельно, а под влиянием других людей. Часто это чужое влияние мы придумываем себе сами. Например, нам кажется, что некто критически относится к нашей фигуре, ради этого мы идем заниматься фитнесом, но уже через короткое время забрасываем эти занятия. Это происходит потому, что подлинные цели ставятся не "ради кого-то", а для нас самих; цель - это то, что по-настоящему необходимо лично нам, это самообязательство.


4. Цели, которые не вдохновляют. Ваши цели должны по-настоящему волновать вас, быть источником сильных эмоций и острых ощущений. Обыденные мелко-бытовые цели никогда не позволят вам оторваться от земли. Планка цели должна быть достаточно высокой, вызывающей восхищение и сильное удивление ("вау-эффект").


5. Потеря фокуса, недостаточная концентрация на цели. Цели имеют удивительное свойство теряться в мириадах мелких мирских задач и проблем, с которыми мы сталкиваемся каждый день. Чтобы не потеряться в этих мелочах, цели должны быть всегда перед глазами - в буквальном смысле слова.
Визуализируйте свои цели - в виде крупного плаката на стене, "обоев" на рабочем столе ПК, фотоколлажа под стеклом рабочего стола и т.п. Чем яснее вы представляете свою цель, тем больше вероятность того, что она будет достигнута.


6. Цели сформулированы негативно. Поставленные нами цели не должны несли бы в себе разрушения, отрицания или избегания. Важно не "бежать от...", а "стремиться к...". Чисто психологически легче и продуктивнее добиваться положительных результатов, чем отрицательных. Достижение негативно сформулированных целей не приносит внутреннего удовлетворения, гордости за результаты.


7. Цели плохо сформулированы, недостаточно конкретизированы (например, по SMART). Напомним, что SMART - методика конкретизации целей/задач. SMART-целями являются те, которые являются конкретными, измеримыми, достижимыми, актуальными и запланированными во времени. Чем конкретнее мы сформулируем наши цели, тем проще нам будет осуществлять контроль за их реальным достижением.


Пересечения:

а) Нереалистичность целей (п.3 в моем списке, и п.1 в данном) - совпадают. Хотя вопрос о том, что такое "нереалистичные" цели, остается открытым… Вот, например, если вы обычный мальчишка, из маленькой деревеньки, скажем, где-нибудь на Смоленщине - цель "стать космонавтом" - является реалистичной или нет? А если я добавлю, что звали этого мальчика Юра и фамилия у него была Гагарин???
(тема эта любопытная, есть кое-какие наработки, поэтому обязательно сделаю отдельную заметку про "реалистичность" в целеполагании)

б) Отсутствие непрерывных действий (п.2) частично совпадает с моими п.1 "Слишком много целей" п.2 "Нет приоритетов".
Я не отрицаю существование лентяев-обывателей, которые живут в своей собственной уютной "диванно-телевизорной" реальности, и для которых главной активностью является "ничего не делать, просто жить". Их жизненные цели ограничены приземленно-бытовыми хлопотами, и какая-либо длящаяся трансситуативная активность (непрерывные ежедневные действия изо дня в день, ведущие к достижению большой Цели) вообще выходит за пределы их понимания и их жизненного мира.

Если же речь идет о "стремящихся", о тех, у кого в жизни присутствуют большие Цели, то отсутствие непрерывных ежедневных действий в их движении к конкретной Цели обычно связано именно с "растрепанностью": целей много, дел/активностей тоже очень много, все интересно, все срочно, все важно! Действия есть, их не просто много, а ОЧЕНЬ много, но они дискретны, не связаны друг с другом. Векторы ежедневных действий торчат в разные стороны, но так и не выстраиваются в единую линию, гарантированно приводящую к намеченной цели.

Выход здесь простой, ТМ-решение лежит в сфере планирования ("Что и когда я должен сделать вчера-сегодня-завтра для достижения цели А?") и самоконтроля ("Что я вчера-сегодня-завтра сделал, какой промежуточный результат достигнут для достижения цели А?"). Трансспективу надо осознано выстраивать!

(Впрочем, есть и иная точка зрения, отличающаяся от принятой в олдскульном тайм-менеджменте… Кто сказал, что движение к цели должно быть линейным, в виде обязательных ежедневных шажков? См., например, Тимура Гагина и его учение о "достигаторах" :))) http://gagin.tv/index.php?page=26 Модель "достигаторства" красивая, но также имеет свои ограничения… О чём я тоже как-нибудь напишу ;) )

в) Отсутствие обязательств (п.3) и отсутствие вдохновения (п.4) в значительной степени пересекается с моим п.7 "Цель на связана с мотивацией". Любая долгосрочная масштабная Цель, по моему глубокому убеждению, должна иметь несколько питающих ее энергией мотивационных источников, как внутренних, так и внешних. При этом мы помним, что мотивационные состояния, которые возникают благодаря мотивационным источникам - это и есть то самое "вдохновение", "чувство потока", "азарт", "соревнование", "эйфория" и проч., без которых движение к Цели превращается в унылое самонаказание. Без мотивационной (энергетической) подпитки любая цель быстро погаснет, потускнеет, и не будет достигнута (или будет достигнута не в полном объеме).

Разумеется, внутренние автономные "источники силы" всегда предпочтительнее внешних, но на определенных этапах достижения цели в т.ч. и обязательства перед другими людьми могут быть хорошим стимулом для эффективного продвижения к Цели. Важно только, чтобы эти обязательства перед другими были не единственным мотиватором, а лишь одним из многих.

Мотивационных источников ("источников" или "точек силы") может быть много - чем больше, тем лучше! Эти источники индивидуальны. Например, если вы экстраверт, то взаимообязательства, поддержка со стороны других людей, их участие (в виде активных помощников или хотя бы в виде сопереживающих собеседников) в процессе достижения ваших целей является обязательным. Для экстравертов достигать (как ни парадоксально это звучит :) ) собственные цели ради кого-то и обязательно вместе с кем-то - абсолютно нормальная ситуация!

г) Потеря фокуса (п.5) = отсутствие приоритетов (п.2 в моем списке)

д) Негативная формулировка целей (п.6) - об этом я писал в моем п.7 "Цель не связана с мотивацией", в частности, упоминая о том, что цели должны быть четко связаны с "положительной" мотивацией, и не должны быть связаны с негативной мотивацией или использоваться в "мотивационных играх" с самим собой. Пример мотивационной игры - когда достижение каких либо целей/задач мы используем, например, в качестве самонаказания.


е) Цели недостаточно конкретизированы (п.7) = мои п.4 "Нет временных рамок", и п.5 "нет измеримости, четких критериев достижения". В английской заметке написано прямо "цели сформулированы не по SMART"… Я против такой категоричности, т.к. встречал довольно много людей, которые никогда и ничего про SMART не слышали, но при этом были крайне эффективными в достижении намеченных целей. С другой стороны, мне доводилось иметь дела с образованными манагерами, прекрасно знающими про SMART (есть организации, где оперативное планирование с использованием SMART принято как корпоративный стандарт), но при этом с достижением этих самых целей на практике у них были баааальшие проблемы :)


Именно поэтому я против впихивания проблемы недостаточной конкретизации целей в рамки идеологии SMART. По моему мнению важно сосредоточиться именно на ключевых причинах - недостаточная конкретизация чего именно сильнее всего мешает достижению целей? Мое мнение: а) недостаточная конкретизация цели во времени - границ (начало и завершения) и основных промежуточных вех; б) недостаточная конкретизация промежуточных результатов.


https://tinyurl.com/yck7pj7z


понедельник, 27 июля 2026 г.

8 Elements Approach – Planned Maintenance Structure

 


Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), a system where workers and operators help clean, check, and fix their own machines to stop breakdowns before they happen. It focuses on team-based upkeep, safety, and making daily work run smoothly.
Key Parts of Total Productive Maintenance
  • Autonomous Maintenance: Operators do simple daily tasks like dusting, oiling, and looking for loose parts on their own tools.
  • Planned Maintenance: Technicians use a calendar to fix or swap parts based on how machines wear down over time.
  • Focused Improvement: Small groups work together to solve hard, repeat machine problems using step-by-step ideas. 
Main Goals
  • Zero Breakdowns: Keep machines running without sudden stops.
  • Zero Defects: Stop bad products from being made due to tool errors.
  • Zero Accidents: Make the workspace safe for everyone. 


TPM activity in which the specialized maintenance department shifts the maintenance focus:

  • from breakdown maintenance (BM) to preventive maintenance (PM);
  • from corrective maintenance (CM) and time-based maintenance (TBM) to predictive maintenance (PdM) or condition-based maintenance (CBM);
  • while reducing maintenance costs and supporting the Autonomous Maintenance program.



Four phases approach for Zero Breakdown


  • Phase 1. Reduction in the irregularity of failure frequency
    • Restoration of deterioration left unattended for a long period to the original state
      • Handling the latent defects
    • Elimination of forced deterioration
      • Establish basic conditions
      • Defining and keeping with operating conditions
  • Phase 2. Extension product life expectancy
    • Improving weak points in the design
      • Improving weakness in strength and accuracy
      • Selecting the components meeting the requirements
      • Improving weakness for excessive loading
    • Elimination of incidental failures
      • Improving operation and maintenance skills
      • Countermeasures to prevent improper operation
      • Countermeasures to prevent improper repair
    • Restoration of external deterioration
  • Phase 3. Time-based restoration of deteriorated portion to the original state
    • Time-based restoration of deterioration
      • Prediction of service life
      • Time-based inspection and testing standards
      • Time-based replacement criteria
      • Improvement of maintainability
    • Detection of the sign of abnormality inside the equipment through senses
      • One which shows a sign and one which does not show any sign
      • What kind of sign can be seen before the abnormality occurs?
      • How can we detect the sign?
  • Phase 4. Prediction of service life
    • Prediction of service life through equipment diagnosis technique. Technological analysis of catastrophic failure
      • Analysis of fracture Plane
      • Analysis of material fatigue
      • Analysis of gear teeth etc.
      • Countermeasure to retain a longer service life
      • From the prediction of service life to the time-based restoration of deterioration


Equipment Model & Parts Model


7 step activities for Planned Maintenance and Autonomous Maintenance


PM 8 Elements. 7 – Step Deployment. Part 1


Part 2


Part 3


Part 4




https://tinyurl.com/2hkjxx63