суббота, 27 мая 2023 г.

Mastering Strategic Management. Chapter 1. Mastering Strategy: Art and Science

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this chapter, you should be able to understand and articulate answers to the following questions:

  1. What are strategic management and strategy?
  2. Why does strategic management matter?
  3. What elements determine firm performance?

Strategic Management: A Core Concern for Apple


The Opening of the Apple Store

March 2, 2011, was a huge day for Apple. The firm released its much-anticipated iPad2, a thinner and faster version of market-leading Apple’s iPad tablet device. Apple also announced that a leading publisher, Random House, had made all seventeen thousand of its books available through Apple’s iBookstore. Apple had enjoyed tremendous success for quite some time. Approximately fifteen million iPads were sold in 2010, and the price of Apple’s stock had more than tripled from early 2009 to early 2011.

But future success was far from guaranteed. The firm’s visionary founder Steve Jobs was battling serious health problems. Apple’s performance had suffered when an earlier health crisis had forced Jobs to step away from the company. This raised serious questions. Would Jobs have to step away again? If so, how might Apple maintain its excellent performance without its leader?

Meanwhile, the iPad2 faced daunting competition. Samsung, LG, Research in Motion, Dell, and other manufacturers were trying to create tablets that were cheaper, faster, and more versatile than the iPad2. These firms were eager to steal market share by selling their tablets to current and potential Apple customers. Could Apple maintain leadership of the tablet market, or would one or more of its rivals dominate the market in the years ahead? Even worse, might a company create a new type of device that would make Apple’s tablets obsolete?

1.1 Defining Strategic Management and Strategy

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  1. Learn what strategic management is.
  2. Understand the key question addressed by strategic management.
  3. Understand why it is valuable to consider different definitions of strategy.
  4. Learn what is meant by each of the 5 Ps of strategy.

What Is Strategic Management?

Issues such as those currently faced by Apple are the focus of strategic management because they help answer the key question examined by strategic management—“Why do some firms outperform other firms?” More specifically, strategic management examines how actions and events involving top executives (such as Steve Jobs), firms (Apple), and industries (the tablet market) influence a firm’s success or failure. Formal tools exist for understanding these relationships, and many of these tools are explained and applied in this book. But formal tools are not enough; creativity is just as important to strategic management. Mastering strategy is therefore part art and part science.

This introductory chapter is intended to enable you to understand what strategic management is and why it is important. Because strategy is a complex concept, we begin by explaining five different ways to think about what strategy involves (Figure 1.1 "Defining Strategy: The Five Ps"). Next, we journey across many centuries to examine the evolution of strategy from ancient times until today. We end this chapter by presenting a conceptual model that maps out one way that executives can work toward mastering strategy. The model also provides an overall portrait of this book’s contents by organizing the remaining nine chapters into a coherent whole.

Defining Strategy: The Five Ps

Defining strategy is not simple. Strategy is a complex concept that involves many different processes and activities within an organization. To capture this complexity, Professor Henry Mintzberg of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, articulated what he labeled as “the 5 Ps of strategy.” According to Mintzberg, understanding how strategy can be viewed as a plan, as a ploy, as a position, as a pattern, and as a perspective is important. Each of these five ways of thinking about strategy is necessary for understanding what strategy is, but none of them alone is sufficient to master the concept.Mintzberg, H. 1987. The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review30(1), 11–24.

Figure 1.1 Defining Strategy: The Five Ps

Images courtesy of Thinkstock (first); [citation redacted per publisher request] (second); Wikipedia (third); Old Navy (fourth); James Duncan Davidson from Portland, USA (fifth).

Strategy as a Plan

Strategic plans are the essence of strategy, according to one classic view of strategy. A strategic plan is a carefully crafted set of steps that a firm intends to follow to be successful. Virtually every organization creates a strategic plan to guide its future. In 1996, Apple’s performance was not strong, and Gilbert F. Amelio was appointed as chief executive officer in the hope of reversing the company’s fortunes. In a speech focused on strategy, Amelio described a plan that centered on leveraging the Internet (which at the time was in its infancy) and developing multimedia products and services. Apple’s subsequent success selling over the Internet via iTunes and with the iPad can be traced back to the plan articulated in 1996.Markoff, J. 1996, May 14. Apple unveils strategic plan of small steps. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1996/05/14/business/apple-unveils-strategic -plan-of-small-steps.html

business model should be a central element of a firm’s strategic plan. Simply stated, a business model describes the process through which a firm hopes to earn profits. It probably won’t surprise you to learn that developing a viable business model requires that a firm sell goods or services for more than it costs the firm to create and distribute those goods. A more subtle but equally important aspect of a business model is providing customers with a good or service more cheaply than they can create it themselves.

Consider, for example, large chains of pizza restaurants such as Papa John’s and Domino’s.


Franchises such as Pizza Hut provide an example of a popular business model that has been successful worldwide.


Hannibal’s clever use of elephants to cross the Alps provides an example of a strategic ploy.


Old Navy occupies a unique position as the low-cost strategy within the Gap Inc.’s fleet of brands.

KEY TAKEAWAY

  • Strategic management focuses on firms and the different strategies that they use to become and remain successful. Multiple views of strategy exist, and the 5 Ps described by Henry Mintzberg enhance understanding of the various ways in which firms conceptualize strategy.

EXERCISES

  1. Have you developed a strategy to manage your career? Should you make it more detailed? Why or why not?
  2. Identify an example of each of the 5 Ps of strategy other than the examples offered in this section.
  3. What business that you visit regularly seems to have the most successful business model? What makes the business model work?

1.2 Intended, Emergent, and Realized Strategies

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  1. Learn what is meant by intended and emergent strategies and the differences between them.
  2. Understand realized strategies and how they are influenced by intended, deliberate, and emergent strategies.

A few years ago, a consultant posed a question to thousands of executives: “Is your industry facing overcapacity and fierce price competition?” All but one said “yes.” The only “no” came from the manager of a unique operation—the Panama Canal! This manager was fortunate to be in charge of a venture whose services are desperately needed by shipping companies and that offers the only simple route linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The canal’s success could be threatened if transoceanic shipping was to cease or if a new canal were built. Both of these possibilities are extremely remote, however, so the Panama Canal appears to be guaranteed to have many customers for as long as anyone can see into the future.

When an organization’s environment is stable and predictable, strategic planning can provide enough of a strategy for the organization to gain and maintain success. The executives leading the organization can simply create a plan and execute it, and they can be confident that their plan will not be undermined by changes over time. But as the consultant’s experience shows, only a few executives—such as the manager of the Panama Canal—enjoy a stable and predictable situation. Because change affects the strategies of almost all organizations, understanding the concepts of intended, emergent, and realized strategies is important (Figure 1.2 "Strategic Planning and Learning: Intended, Emergent, and Realized Strategies"). Also relevant are deliberate and nonrealized strategies. The relationships among these five concepts are presented in Figure 1.3 "A Model of Intended, Deliberate, and Realized Strategy".Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal6, 257–272.

Intended and Emergent Strategies

Figure 1.3 A Model of Intended, Deliberate, and Realized Strategy


Reproduced with permission from [citation redacted per publisher request].

An intended strategy is the strategy that an organization hopes to execute. Intended strategies are usually described in detail within an organization’s strategic plan. When a strategic plan is created for a new venture, it is called a business plan. As an undergraduate student at Yale in 1965, Frederick Smith had to complete a business plan for a proposed company as a class project. His plan described a delivery system that would gain efficiency by routing packages through a central hub and then pass them to their destinations. A few years later, Smith started Federal Express (FedEx), a company whose strategy closely followed the plan laid out in his class project. Today, Frederick Smith’s personal wealth has surpassed $2 billion, and FedEx ranks eighth among the World’s Most Admired Companies according to Fortune magazine. Certainly, Smith’s intended strategy has worked out far better than even he could have dreamed.Donahoe, J. A. 2011, March 10. Forbes: Fred Smith’s fortune grows to $.21B. Memphis Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.bizjournals.com/memphis/news/2011/03/10/forbes-fred-smiths-fortune-grows-to.htmlFortune: FedEx 8th “most admired” company in the world. Memphis Business Journal. Retrieved from http://www.bizjournals .com/memphis/news/2011/03/03/fortune-fedex-8th-most- admired.html

Emergent strategy has also played a role at Federal Express. An emergent strategy is an unplanned strategy that arises in response to unexpected opportunities and challenges. Sometimes emergent strategies result in disasters. In the mid-1980s, FedEx deviated from its intended strategy’s focus on package delivery to capitalize on an emerging technology: facsimile (fax) machines. The firm developed a service called ZapMail that involved documents being sent electronically via fax machines between FedEx offices and then being delivered to customers’ offices. FedEx executives hoped that ZapMail would be a success because it reduced the delivery time of a document from overnight to just a couple of hours. Unfortunately, however, the ZapMail system had many technical problems that frustrated customers. Even worse, FedEx failed to anticipate that many businesses would simply purchase their own fax machines. ZapMail was shut down before long, and FedEx lost hundreds of millions of dollars following its failed emergent strategy. In retrospect, FedEx had made a costly mistake by venturing outside of the domain that was central to its intended strategy: package delivery.Funding Universe. FedEx Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company -histories/FedEx-Corporation-Company-History.html

Emergent strategies can also lead to tremendous success. Southern Bloomer Manufacturing Company was founded to make underwear for use in prisons and mental hospitals. Many managers of such institutions believe that the underwear made for retail markets by companies such as Calvin Klein and Hanes is simply not suitable for the people under their care. Instead, underwear issued to prisoners needs to be sturdy and durable to withstand the rigors of prison activities and laundering. To meet these needs, Southern Bloomers began selling underwear made of heavy cotton fabric.

An unexpected opportunity led Southern Bloomer to go beyond its intended strategy of serving institutional needs for durable underwear. Just a few years after opening, Southern Bloomer’s performance was excellent. It was servicing the needs of about 125 facilities, but unfortunately, this was creating a vast amount of scrap fabric. An attempt to use the scrap as stuffing for pillows had failed, so the scrap was being sent to landfills. This was not only wasteful but also costly.

One day, cofounder Don Sonner visited a gun shop with his son. Sonner had no interest in guns, but he quickly spotted a potential use for his scrap fabric during this visit. The patches that the gun shop sold to clean the inside of gun barrels were of poor quality. According to Sonner, when he “saw one of those flimsy woven patches they sold that unraveled when you touched them, I said, ‘Man, that’s what I can do’” with the scrap fabric. Unlike other gun-cleaning patches, the patches that Southern Bloomer sold did not give off threads or lint, two by-products that hurt guns’ accuracy and reliability. The patches quickly became popular with the military, police departments, and individual gun enthusiasts. Before long, Southern Bloomer was selling thousands of pounds of patches per month. A casual trip to a gun store unexpectedly gave rise to a lucrative emergent strategy.Wells, K. 2002. Floating off the page: The best stories from the Wall Street Journal’s middle column. New York: Simon & Shuster. Quote from page 97.

Realized Strategy

realized strategy is the strategy that an organization actually follows. Realized strategies are a product of a firm’s intended strategy (i.e., what the firm planned to do), the firm’s deliberate strategy (i.e., the parts of the intended strategy that the firm continues to pursue over time), and its emergent strategy (i.e., what the firm did in reaction to unexpected opportunities and challenges). In the case of FedEx, the intended strategy devised by its founder many years ago—fast package delivery via a centralized hub—remains a primary driver of the firm’s realized strategy. For Southern Bloomers Manufacturing Company, realized strategy has been shaped greatly by both its intended and emergent strategies, which center on underwear and gun-cleaning patches.

In other cases, firms’ original intended strategies are long forgotten. A nonrealized strategy refers to the abandoned parts of the intended strategy. When aspiring author David McConnell was struggling to sell his books, he decided to offer complimentary perfume as a sales gimmick. McConnell’s books never did escape the stench of failure, but his perfumes soon took on the sweet smell of success. The California Perfume Company was formed to market the perfumes; this firm evolved into the personal care products juggernaut known today as Avon. For McConnell, his dream to be a successful writer was a nonrealized strategy, but through Avon, a successful realized strategy was driven almost entirely by opportunistically capitalizing on change through emergent strategy.

Strategy at the Movies

The Social Network

Did Harvard University student Mark Zuckerberg set out to build a billion-dollar company with more than six hundred million active users? Not hardly. As shown in 2010’s The Social Network, Zuckerberg’s original concept in 2003 had a dark nature. After being dumped by his girlfriend, a bitter Zuckerberg created a website called “FaceMash” where the attractiveness of young women could be voted on. This evolved first into an online social network called Thefacebook that was for Harvard students only. When the network became surprisingly popular, it then morphed into Facebook, a website open to everyone. Facebook is so pervasive today that it has changed the way we speak, such as the word friend being used as a verb. Ironically, Facebook’s emphasis on connecting with existing and new friends is about as different as it could be from Zuckerberg’s original mean-spirited concept. Certainly, Zuckerberg’s emergent and realized strategies turned out to be far nobler than the intended strategy that began his adventure in entrepreneurship.


The Social Network demonstrates how founder Mark Zuckerberg’s intended strategy gave way to an emergent strategy via the creation of Facebook.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

George Santayana, The Life of Reason

Santayana’s quote has strong implications for strategic management. The history of strategic management can be traced back several thousand years. Great wisdom about strategy can be acquired by understanding the past, but ignoring the lessons of history can lead to costly strategic mistakes that could have been avoided. Certainly, the present offers very important lessons; businesses can gain knowledge about what strategies do and do not work by studying the current actions of other businesses. But this section discusses two less obvious sources of wisdom: (1) strategy in ancient times and (2) military strategy. This section also briefly traces the development of strategic management as a field of study.

Strategy in Ancient Times

Perhaps the earliest-known discussion of strategy is offered in the Old Testament of the Bible.Bracker, J. 1980. The historical development of the strategic management concept. Academy of Management Review5(2), 219–224. Approximately 3,500 years ago, Moses faced quite a challenge after leading his fellow Hebrews out of enslavement in Egypt. Moses was overwhelmed as the lone strategist at the helm of a nation that may have exceeded one million people. Based on advice from his father-in-law, Moses began delegating authority to other leaders, each of whom oversaw a group of people. This hierarchical delegation of authority created a command structure that freed Moses to concentrate on the biggest decisions and helped him implement his strategies (Figure 1.4 "Strategy in Ancient Times"). Similarly, the demands of strategic management today are simply too much for a chief executive officer (the top leader of a company) to handle alone. Many important tasks are thus entrusted to vice presidents and other executives.

In ancient China, strategist and philosopher Sun Tzu offered thoughts on strategy that continue to be studied carefully by business and military leaders today. Sun Tzu’s best-known work is The Art of War. As this title implies, Sun Tzu emphasized the creative and deceptive aspects of strategy.

One of Sun Tzu’s ideas that has numerous business applications is that winning a battle without fighting is the best way to win. Apple’s behavior in the personal computer business offers a good example of this idea in action. Many computer makers such as Toshiba, Acer, and Lenovo compete with one another based primarily on price. This leads to price wars that undermine the computer makers’ profits. In contrast, Apple prefers to develop unique features for its computers, features that have created a fiercely loyal set of customers. Apple boldly charges far more for its computers than its rivals charge for theirs. Apple does not even worry much about whether its computers’ software is compatible with the software used by most other computers. Rather than fighting a battle with other firms, Apple wins within the computer business by creating its own unique market and by attracting a set of loyal customers. Sun Tzu would probably admire Apple’s approach.

Perhaps the most famous example of strategy in ancient times revolves around the Trojan horse. According to legend, Greek soldiers wanted to find a way to enter the gates of Troy and attack the city from the inside. They devised a ploy that involved creating a giant wooden horse, hiding soldiers inside the horse, and offering the horse to the Trojans as a gift. The Trojans were fooled and brought the horse inside their city. When night arrived, the hidden Greek soldiers opened the gates for their army, leading to a Greek victory. In modern times, the term Trojan horse refers to gestures that appear on the surface to be beneficial to the recipient but that mask a sinister intent. Computer viruses also are sometimes referred to as Trojan horses.

A far more noble approach to strategy than the Greeks’ is attributed to King Arthur of Britain. Unlike the hierarchical approach to organizing Moses used, Arthur allegedly considered himself and each of his knights to have an equal say in plotting the group’s strategy. Indeed, the group is thought to have held its meetings at a round table so that no voice, including Arthur’s, would be seen as more important than the others. The choice of furniture in modern executive suites is perhaps revealing. Most feature rectangular meeting tables, perhaps signaling that one person—the chief executive officer—is in charge.

Another implication for strategic management offered by King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table involves the concept of mission. Their vigorous search to find the Holy Grail (the legendary cup used by Jesus and his disciples at the Last Supper) serves as an exemplar for the importance of a central mission to guide organizational strategy and actions.

Lessons Offered by Military Strategy

Key military conflicts and events have shaped the understanding of strategic management (Figure 1.5 "Classic Military Strategy"). Indeed, the word strategy has its roots in warfare. The Greek verb strategos means “army leader” and the idea of stratego (from which we get the word strategy) refers to defeating an enemy by effectively using resources.Bracker, J. 1980. The historical development of the strategic management concept. Academy of Management Review5(2), 219–224.

A book written nearly five hundred years ago is still regarded by many as an insightful guide for conquering and ruling territories. Niccolò Machiavelli’s 1532 book The Prince offers clever recipes for success to government leaders. Some of the book’s suggestions are quite devious, and the word Machiavellian is used today to refer to acts of deceit and manipulation.

Two wars fought on American soil provide important lessons about strategic management. In the late 1700s, the American Revolution pitted the American colonies against mighty Great Britain. The Americans relied on nontraditional tactics, such as guerilla warfare and the strategic targeting of British officers. Although these tactics were considered by Great Britain to be barbaric, they later became widely used approaches to warfare. The Americans owed their success in part to help from the French navy, illustrating the potential value of strategic alliances.

Nearly a century later, Americans turned on one another during the Civil War. After four years of hostilities, the Confederate states were forced to surrender. Historians consider the Confederacy to have had better generals, but the Union possessed greater resources, such as factories and railroad lines. As many modern companies have discovered, sometimes good strategies simply cannot overcome a stronger adversary.

Two wars fought on Russian soil also offer insights. In the 1800s, a powerful French invasion force was defeated in part by the brutal nature of Russian winters. In the 1940s, a similar fate befell German forces during World War II. Against the advice of some of his leading generals, Adolf Hitler ordered his army to conquer Russia. Like the French before them, the Germans were able to penetrate deep into Russian territory. As George Santayana had warned, however, the forgotten past was about to repeat itself. Horrific cold stopped the German advance. Russian forces eventually took control of the combat, and Hitler committed suicide as the Russians approached the German capital, Berlin.

Five years earlier, Germany ironically had benefited from an opponent ignoring the strategic management lessons of the past. In ancient times, the Romans had assumed that no army could cross a mountain range known as the Alps. An enemy general named Hannibal put his men on elephants, crossed the mountains, and caught Roman forces unprepared. French commanders made a similar bad assumption in 1940. When Germany invaded Belgium (and then France) in 1940, its strategy caught French forces by surprise.

The top French commanders assumed that German tanks simply could not make it through a thickly wooded region known as the Ardennes Forest. As a result, French forces did not bother preparing a strong defense in that area. Most of the French army and their British allies instead protected against a small, diversionary force that the Germans had sent as a deception to the north of the forest. German forces made it through the forest, encircled the allied forces, and started driving them toward the ocean. Many thousands of French and British soldiers were killed or captured. In retrospect, the French generals had ignored an important lesson of history: Do not make assumptions about what your adversary can and cannot do. Executives who make similar assumptions about their competitors put their organizations’ performance in jeopardy.

Strategic Management as a Field of Study

Universities contain many different fields of study, including physics, literature, chemistry, computer science, and engineering. Some fields of study date back many centuries (e.g., literature), while others (such as computer science) have emerged only in recent years. Strategic management has been important throughout history, but the evolution of strategic management into a field of study has mostly taken place over the past century. A few of the key business and academic events that have helped the field develop are discussed next (Figure 1.6 "The Modern History of Strategic Management").

The ancient Chinese strategist Sun Tzu made it clear that strategic management is part art. But it is also part science. Major steps toward developing the scientific aspect of strategic management were taken in the early twentieth century by Frederick W. Taylor. In 1911, Taylor published The Principles of Scientific Management. The book was a response to Taylor’s observation that most tasks within organizations were organized haphazardly. Taylor believed that businesses would be much more efficient if management principles were derived through scientific investigation. In The Principles of Scientific Management, Taylor stressed how organizations could become more efficient through identifying the “one best way” of performing important tasks. Implementing Taylor’s principles was thought to have saved railroad companies hundreds of millions of dollars.[citation redacted per publisher request]. Although many later works disputed the merits of trying to find the “one best way,” Taylor’s emphasis on maximizing organizational performance became the core concern of strategic management as the field developed.

Also in the early twentieth century, automobile maker Henry Ford emerged as one of the pioneers of strategic management among industrial leaders. At the time, cars seemed to be a luxury item for wealthy people. Ford adopted a unique strategic perspective, however, and boldly offered the vision that he would make cars the average family could afford. Building on ideas about efficiency from Taylor and others, Ford organized assembly lines for creating automobiles that lowered costs dramatically. Despite his wisdom, Ford also made mistakes. Regarding his company’s flagship product, the Model T, Ford famously stated, “Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants so long as it is black.” When rival automakers provided customers with a variety of color choices, Ford had no choice but to do the same.

In 1912, Harvard University became the first higher education institution to offer a course focused on how business executives could lead their organizations to greater success. The approach to maximizing performance within this “business policy” course was consistent with Taylor’s ideas. Specifically, the goal of the business policy course was to identify the one best response to any given problem that an organization confronted. By finding and pursuing this ideal solution, the organization would have the best chance of enjoying success.

In the 1920s, A&W Root Beer became the first franchised restaurant chain. Franchising involves an organization (called a franchisor) granting the right to use its brand name, products, and processes to other organizations (known as franchisees) in exchange for an up-front payment (a franchise fee) and a percentage of franchisees’ revenues (a royalty fee). This simple yet powerful business model allows franchisors to grow their brands rapidly and provides franchisees with the safety of a proven business format. Within a few decades, the franchising business model would fuel incredible successes for many franchisors and franchisees across a variety of industries. Today, for example, both Subway and McDonald’s have more than thirty thousand restaurants carrying their brand names.

The acceptance of strategic management as a necessary element of business school programs took a major step forward in 1959. A widely circulated report created by the Ford Foundation recommended that all business schools offer a “capstone” course. The goal of this course would be to integrate knowledge across different business fields such as marketing, finance, and accounting to help students devise better ideas for addressing complex business problems. Rather than seeking a “one best way” solution, as advocated by Taylor and Harvard’s business policy course, this capstone course would emphasize students’ critical thinking skills in general and the notion that multiple ways of addressing a problem could be equally successful in particular. The Ford Foundation report was a key motivator that led US universities to create strategic management courses in their undergraduate and master of business administration programs.

In 1962, business and academic events occurred that seemed minor at the time but that would later give rise to huge changes. Building on the business savvy that he had gained as a franchisee, Sam Walton opened the first Walmart in Rogers, Arkansas. Relying on a strategy that emphasized low prices and high levels of customer service, Walmart grew to 882 stores with a combined $8.4 billion dollars in annual sales by 1985. A decade later, sales reached $93.6 billion across nearly 3,000 stores. In 2010, Walmart was the largest company in the world. In recent years, Walmart has arguably downplayed customer service in favor of cutting costs. Time will tell whether deviating from Sam Walton’s original strategic positioning will hurt the company.

Also in 1962, Harvard professor Alfred Chandler published Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. This book describes how strategy and organizational structure need to be consistent with each other to ensure strong firm performance, a lesson that Moses seems to have mastered during the Hebrews’ exodus from Egypt. Many people working in the field of strategic management consider Chandler’s book to be the first work of strategic management research.

Two pivotal events that firmly established strategic management as a field of study took place in 1980. One was the creation of the Strategic Management Journal. The introduction of the journal offered a forum for researchers interested in building knowledge about strategic management. Much like important new medical findings appear in the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine, the Strategic Management Journal publishes pathbreaking insights about strategic management.

The second pivotal event in 1980 was the publication of Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors by Harvard professor Michael Porter. This book offers concepts such as five forces analysis and generic strategies that continue to strongly influence how executives choose strategies more than thirty years after the book’s publication. Given the importance of these concepts, both five forces analysis and generic strategies are discussed in detail in Chapter 3 "Evaluating the External Environment" and Chapter 5 "Selecting Business-Level Strategies", respectively.

Many consumers today take web-based shopping for granted, but this channel for commerce was created less than two decades ago. The 1995 launch of Amazon by founder Jeff Bezos was perhaps the pivotal event in creating Internet-based commerce. In pursuit of its vision “to be earth’s most customer-centric company,” Amazon has diversified far beyond its original focus on selling books and has evolved into a dominant retailer. Powerful giants have stumbled badly in Amazon’s wake. Sears had sold great varieties of goods (even including entire houses) through catalogs for many decades, as had JCPenney. Neither firm created a strong online sales presence to keep pace with Amazon, and both eventually dropped their catalog businesses. As often happens with old and large firms, Sears and JCPenney were outmaneuvered by a creative and versatile upstart.

Ethics have long been an important issue within the strategic management field. Attention to the need for executives to act ethically when creating strategies increased dramatically in the early 2000s when a series of companies such as Enron Corporation, WorldCom, Tyco, Qwest, and Global Crossing were found to have grossly exaggerated the strength of their performance. After a series of revelations about fraud and corruption, investors in these firms and others lost billions of dollars, tens of thousands of jobs were lost, and some executives were sent to prison.

Like ethics, the implications of international competition are of central interest to strategic management. Provocative new thoughts on the nature of the international arena were offered in 2005 by Thomas L. Friedman. In his book The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Friedman argues that many of the advantages that firms in developed countries such as the United States, Japan, and Great Britain take for granted are disappearing. One implication is that these firms will need to improve their strategies if they are to remain successful.

Looking to the future, it appears likely that strategic management will prove to be more important than ever. In response, researchers who are interested in strategic management will work to build additional knowledge about how organizations can maximize their performance. Executives will need to keep track of the latest scientific findings. Meanwhile, they also must leverage the insights that history offers on how to be successful while trying to avoid history’s mistakes.

KEY TAKEAWAY

  • Although strategic management as a field of study has developed mostly over the last century, the concept of strategy is much older. Understanding strategic management can benefit greatly by learning the lessons that ancient history and military strategy provide.

EXERCISES

  1. What do you think was the most important event related to strategy in ancient times?
  2. In what ways are the strategic management of business and military strategy alike? In what ways are they different?
  3. Do you think executives are more ethical today as a result of the scandals in the early 2000s? Why or why not?

1.4 Understanding the Strategic Management Process

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  1. Learn the strategic management process.
  2. Understand the four steps in the strategic management process.


Modeling the Strategy Process

Strategic management is a process that involves building a careful understanding of how the world is changing, as well as a knowledge of how those changes might affect a particular firm. CEOs, such as late Apple-founder Steve Jobs, must be able to carefully manage the possible actions that their firms might take to deal with changes that occur in their environment. We present a model of the strategic management process in Figure 1.7 "Overall Model of the Strategic Management Process". This model also guides our presentation of the chapters contained in this book.

Figure 1.7 Overall Model of the Strategic Management Process


The strategic management process begins with an understanding of strategy and performance. As we have noted in this introductory chapter, strategic management is both an art and a science, and it involves multiple conceptualizations of the notion of strategy drawn from recent and ancient history. In Chapter 2 "Leading Strategically", we focus on how leading strategically is needed if the firm is to achieve the long-term strong performance companies such as Apple have attained. Consequently, how managers understand and interpret the performance of their firms is often central to understanding strategy.

Environmental and internal scanning is the next stage in the process. Managers must constantly scan the external environment for trends and events that affect the overall economy, and they must monitor changes in the particular industry in which the firm operates. For example, Apple’s decision to create the iPhone demonstrates its ability to interpret that traditional industry boundaries that distinguished the cellular phone industry and the computer industry were beginning to blur. At the same time, firms must evaluate their own resources to understand how they might react to changes in the environment. For example, intellectual property is a vital resource for Apple. Between 2008 and 2010, Apple filed more than 350 cases with the US Patent and Trademark Office to protect its use of such terms as applepod, and safari.Apple Inc. litigation. Wikipedia. Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._ litigation

A classic management tool that incorporates the idea of scanning elements both external and internal to the firm is SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. Strengths and weaknesses are assessed by examining the firm’s resources, while opportunities and threats refer to external events and trends. The value of SWOT analysis parallels ideas from classic military strategists such as Sun Tzu, who noted the value of knowing yourself as well as your opponent. Chapter 3 "Evaluating the External Environment" examines the topic of evaluating the external environment in detail, and Chapter 4 "Managing Firm Resources" presents concepts and tools for managing firm resources.

The importance of knowing yourself and your opponent is applicable to the knowledge of strategic management for business, military strategy, and classic strategy games such as chess.

Strategy formulation is the next step in the strategic management process. This involves developing specific strategies and actions. Certainly, part of Apple’s success is due to the unique products it offers the market, as well as how these products complement one another. A customer can buy an iPod that plays music from iTunes—all of which can be stored in Apple’s Mac computer.Inside CRM Editors. Effective strategies Apple uses to create loyal customers [Online article]. Retrieved from http://www.insidecrm.com/features/strategies-apple-loyal -customers In Chapter 5 "Selecting Business-Level Strategies", we discuss how selecting business-level strategies helps to provide firms with a recipe that can be followed that will increase the likelihood that their strategies will be successful. In Chapter 6 "Supporting the Business-Level Strategy: Competitive and Cooperative Moves", we present insights on how firms can support the business-level strategy through competitive and cooperative moves. Chapter 7 "Competing in International Markets" presents possibilities for firms competing in international markets, and Chapter 8 "Selecting Corporate-Level Strategies" focuses on selecting corporate-level strategies.

Strategy implementation is the final stage of the process. One important element of strategy implementation entails crafting an effective organizational structure and corporate culture. For example, part of Apple’s success is due to its consistent focus on innovation and creativity that Steve Jobs described as similar to that of a start-up. Chapter 9 "Executing Strategy through Organizational Design" offers ideas on how to manage these elements of implementation. The final chapter explores how to lead an ethical organization through corporate governance, social responsibility, and sustainability.

KEY TAKEAWAY

  • Strategic management is a process that requires the ability to manage change. Consequently, executives must be careful to monitor and to interpret the events in their environment, to take appropriate actions when change is needed, and to monitor their performance to ensure that their firms are able to survive and, it is hoped, thrive over time.

EXERCISES

  1. Who makes the strategic decisions for most organizations?
  2. Why is it important to view strategic management as a process?
  3. What are the four steps of the strategic management process?
  4. How is chess relevant to the study of strategic management? What other games might help teach strategic thinking?

1.5 Conclusion

This chapter provides an overview of strategic management and strategy. Ideas about strategy span many centuries, and modern understanding of strategy borrows from ancient strategies as well as classic militaries strategies. You should now understand that there are numerous ways to conceptualize the idea of strategy and that effective strategic management is needed to ensure the long-term success of firms. The study of strategic management provides tools to effectively manage organizations, but it also involves the art of knowing how and when to apply creative thinking. Knowledge of both the art and the science of strategic management is needed to help guide organizations as their strategies emerge and evolve over time. Such tools will also help you effectively chart a course for your career as well as to understand the effective strategic management of the organizations for which you will work.

EXERCISES

  1. Think about the best and worst companies you know. What is extraordinary (or extraordinarily bad) about these firms? Are their strategies clear and focused or difficult to define?
  2. If you were to write a “key takeaway” section for this chapter, what would you include as the material you found most interesting?

https://cutt.ly/TwqSUhDF
 

Top 40 Content Writing Statistics in 2023

 

Figure 1. The relatively increasing popularity of the keyword “content writing” on Google over the last five years

BLISHED ON DECEMBER 11, 2022    |    4 MINUTE READ



The content writing industry has been gaining popularity over the last five years ( Figure 1). Content writing includes creating, editing, and publishing content that brings organic traffic and increases brand awareness. This makes content writing integral to marketing success.

But investors might be hesitant to invest in the content writing industry. So, we have gathered 40+ statistics about 

  • Content writing industry 
  • Blogging 
  • Content marketing 
  • Audience behavior

to make a data-driven presentation about the current state of the content writing industry as a whole. This will help business leaders analyze how investing in this market can help their businesses.  

Content writing industry statistics

1- Marketers expect the content marketing industry’s revenue to exceed $135 billion by 2026.

2- It is estimated that the AI-powered content market will exceed $250 billion by 2022.

3- Research shows that 70% of B2B marketers were expected to increase their content marketing budget in 2022, as it brings leads three times more than traditional marketing strategies.

4- ~50% of companies were expected to grow their content team in 2022.

5- 75% of large companies outsource content writers.

6- Only 17% of B2B buyers spend most of their time meeting with the suppliers, compared to 83% who spend most of their time researching supplier companies (e.g., reading about them online).

To learn more about the top web content writing vendors, check our benchmarking study of the top 6 content writing services.

Blogging statistics

Best practices


Source: HubSpot

Figure 2. Results of a survey featuring  1,600+ B2B and B2C marketers on the future of content marketing.

7- Polls, games, augmented reality, etc., are the most popular content marketing trends that companies followed in 2022 (Figure 2).

8- ~80% of blog posts are “how-to” articles.

9- “How-to” articles bring 1.5x more organic web traffic than other content types.

10- Publishing 2-6 times a week gets 50% more clicks.

11- Thought leadership is a crucial part of the content writing process. Coupled with omnichannel interaction with the audience, it increases sales by ~20%.

12- In creating quality content, ~75% of writers find case studies the most helpful.1

13- Increasing the appeal of an article by adding visual content (i.e., images, short videos, or graphs) brings 94% more clicks.

Multimedia content creation

14- Internet users share video content with their friends x2 more than other types of content, such as blog posts, e-mails, etc.2

15- 87% of marketers stated that creating video content increases their website traffic.3


Source: Wyzowl

Figure 3. Social media platforms preferred by marketers to share video content.

16- More than 80% of marketers prefer Youtube as their most preferred medium of publishing video content (Figure 3).

Blogging/content writing challenges

17- More than 40% of content writers view producing high-quality content as their biggest challenge.4

18- Only 40% of web content is updated regularly, while the remaining articles are outdated.

Sponsored

Clickworker is a content writing service provider, working with a pool of international Clickworkers who have expertise in content writing and developing SEO-friendly texts in various languages and more than 70 markets. 

To explore how their content writing services work, watch their video:


Audience research statistics

Purchase behavior

19- 77% of Internet users do research (i.e., reading content online) before making a purchase-related decision.

20- ~30% of local searches on the Internet turn to purchases.

21- ~35% of customers make purchase decisions after reading engaging content that provides valuable insights about a good/service.

Reading habits

22- Readers spend ~40 seconds on a blog post.

23- Engaging with the target audience by putting mini quizzes, thought experiments, etc., into the written content makes them spend 4-5x more time on pages with interactive content, thus increasing website traffic.

24- Pages with more than 1000 words correlate with getting more clicks. 

25- 94% of readers only check the results on the first page, and ~65% click only the first three links.

Content marketing statistics

Best practices


Source: Content Marketing Institute 

Figure 4. How do content marketers benefit from content writing, and how did this change from 2021 to 2022?

26- Companies use content writing the most to build trust, followed by ensuring brand loyalty, nurturing leads, and generating sales (See Figure 4)

27- 97% of marketers think content writing is a crucial marketing strategy.

28- ~60% of marketers report attracting new customers through content marketing efforts.

29- Marketers, in making budget allocation forecasts, claim that ~30% of the total marketing budget can be dedicated to content marketing for lead generation and increasing brand awareness.

30- B2B marketers benefit most from content writing for creating whitepapers and use cases.

31- B2C marketers use content writing as a marketing tool for creating podcasts and short-form video content.

Learn more about the top 10 content writing best practices.

SEO statistics

32- SEO has been considered a “great” content marketing strategy as it increases product awareness.

33- B2B marketers state that SEO investments bring better ROI, while B2C marketers get more positive ROI for short-form content (e.g., posts on social media platforms) compared to other forms of content marketing trends.

34- The organic search traffic is ~9x more for SEO than traditional marketing strategies.

Learn more about SEO in content creation and its business benefits.

Here is our article on SEO content service pricing for those who are considering investing in SEO services and want to know how much to pay.

Social media statistics


Source: Content Marketing Institute

Figure 5. The distribution of the preferred social media platforms by B2B marketers for content creation.

35- %77 of companies use social media platforms as their top channel to share content.5

36- LinkedIn is the most preferred social media platform for B2B marketers (See Figure 5).

Content marketing challenges

37- ~35% of marketers view ensuring content quality as “challenging.”

38- B2B marketers struggle to provide high-quality content more than B2C marketers.

39- 40% of B2B companies do not have solid, well-documented content marketing strategies.

40- Only 35% of marketers surveyed have tangible KPIs in content writing.

You can read the top challenges in content marketing and our solutions.

 We also have a  data-driven list of content-writing services for those interested.

https://cutt.ly/TwqSWX7W

Пошаговый алгоритм создания команды единомышленников. Часть 3. Научиться договариваться

 Рассмотрим алгоритм, как договариваться друг с другом на примере проведения стратегической сессии. Вокруг формирования договорённостей существует много мифов, подпитываемых тренингами командообразования. В 90-е эта тема была на пике популярности.

Договорённости для меня - это во многом про умение высказать свою точку зрения, услышать и обсудить другую, аргументированно подискутировать, если в этом возникнет необходимость. Бывает, что работая с компанией, мы сознательно провоцируем жаркие споры, если видим, что все молча со всем соглашаются и всегда единодушны. Это плохой знак. Очень плохой. Это признак скрытого равнодушия, саботажа и зреющего взрыва.

Именно поэтому самый лучший способ научиться договариваться - делать это предметно, обсуждая актуальные для компании и ее сотрудников вопросы. Мы рекомендуем начинать с безопасных и важных для каждого тем. Таких как развитие компании и ее будущее. Методом проб и ошибок мы выработали рабочий алгоритм, которым и делимся в этом материале.

Шаг 1. Определите вместе желаемую точку через 3-5 лет

Ответьте на вопрос Где мы хотим быть? В нашей практике часто для начала берут более короткий промежуток - 1 год. Но важно помнить, что такой короткий интервал возможен при наличии понимания организации через 5 лет или, как минимум, 3 года. Лично я считаю самым оптимальным обсуждение того, как будет выглядеть организация через 5 лет, а затем, как промежуточные точки, 3 года и 1 год.

Самая простая и рабочая методика: Метод Уолта Диснея.

Еще один простой метод называется "Гость из будущего". Вы предлагаете Вашим коллегам представить, что к Вам в гости приехал, например, коммерческий директор из 2019 года (в зависимости от горизонта планирования). О чем он рассказывает? Какие продукты/сервисы продает компания? Кто клиенты компании? Кто основные конкуренты? Что о компании говорят клиенты? Как обстоят дела с финансами?

Попросите участников сначала каждого молча самостоятельно записать идеи на стикерах. Потом обсудить это в тройках и выбрать самые реалистичные. 1 идея - 1 стикер, писать печатными буквами, чтобы можно было прочитать и спустя длительное время.

Соберите идеи, озвучьте их и повесьте в зависимости от количества на 1-2 листах флип-чарта. Сгруппируйте. Дайте все вместе названия группам.

Шаг 2. Какие препятствия существуют?

Обычно здесь начинаются самые жаркие дебаты. Я рекомендую выделить на этот этап побольше времени и дать всем высказаться. Правила просты:

  1. Только препятствия, не шаги
  2. Точку зрения другого не критикуем
  3. Все идеи принимаются
  4. Без перехода на личности (говорим о должности, а не о человеке)
  5. Участвует каждый

Попросите каждого сначала провести индивидуальный мозговой штурм на листах А4. В течение 5 минут выписать все препятствия к достижению "светлого будущего", на котором все сошлись в предыдущем пункте. Далее в группах по 4-5 человек обсудить эти препятствия. Выписать 5-6 ключевых. Озвучить их и зафиксировать на флип-чарте на стикерах. Эти препятствия также сгруппировать.

См. Рис.1 Препятствия


Шаг 3. Как мы их преодолеем?

  • Знать препятствия и объединить видение здорово, но этого мало. Важно сформировать программу действий по их преодолению. Я предлагаю построить карту преодоления препятствий. Делается это в три этапа:
  • Дайте каждому участнику по цветному маркеру и попросите проголосовать за самые критичные препятствия. Каждый может проголосовать только за три. Первое лицо компании голосует последним. Составьте по итогам голосования рейтинг препятствий. Где 1 - самое важное и опасное препятствие.
  • Разбейте участников на новые группы по 5 человек (так, чтобы в группах оказались участники, которые не работали ранее вместе). Раздайте каждой группе свои препятствия из рейтинга (2-3 препятствия). И попросите предложить мероприятия (шаги, в которых понятны) по нейтрализации препятствия или его ослаблению. Препятствие - мероприятие - действие. Удобно представить это в виде интеллект-карты.
 См. Рис.2 Карта преодоления препятствий


Шаг 4. Наши ресурсы

Кроме препятствий есть еще и ресурсы, которые помогут достичь целей.

Попросите участников в группах по 5-6 человек обсудить и зафиксировать ресурсы, которые есть у компании. Лучше не задавать жёстких рамок, провести работу в режиме мозгового штурма и дать возможность группам записать на стикерах неограниченное количество ресурсов, не критикуя и не оценивая. Далее объединить видение всех групп, сгруппировать, назвать группы. Итогом этой части станет обсуждение влияния ресурсов на достижение общей цели.

Шаг 5. Что нас объединяет

Важная составляющая команды, кроме общих целей, общие ценности - ценностное ядро команды.

Попросите каждого молча индивидуально записать на стикерах печатными буквами то, что ему важно в работе и жизни. Количество идей не ограничено. На все 3 минуты. 1 идея - 1 стикер. Можно сделать это анонимно.

Соберите все и приклейте стикеры на флип-чарте. Выделите повторяющиеся, близкие. Перенесите на отдельный лист те, которые встречаются у 2/3 участников. Это и есть ваше ценностное ядро. С этими ценностями можно работать дальше, выделяя взаимоисключающие и комплиментарные, но в рамках этой работы вполне достаточно и такого ядра. Обсудите, что эти ценности значат для совместной работы, для достижения целей.

Вопрос, на который Вам предстоит ответить теперь -

Шаг 6. О чём нам надо договориться?

Вы обсудили желаемое будущее, препятствия к его достижению, построили карту преодоления препятствий, выделили ресурсы и даже ценностное ядро. Осталось совсем немного. Спросите у коллег: о чём нам надо договориться? Что нужно, чтобы вы реализовали планы, нейтрализовали препятствия и воспользовались возможностями?

Лучше и здесь попросить каждого сначала записать идеи индивидуально, потом обсудить их в группах и зафиксировать на флипчарте. Сделали? Дело за малым! Договоритесь об этом! В группах! С обязательной фиксацией договоренностей. Что это может быть? Например, договоренности о правилах работы в openspace или правила выполнения задач. А может и правила протоколирования совещаний.

Поздравляю! Вы уже на финишной прямой! Осталось обсудить еще один щекотливый момент -

Шаг 7. Ожидания друг от друга

См. Рис. 3 Сессия ожиданий


Фух! Огромная работа проделана. Кажется, Вы научились договариваться? Пора переходить к следующему этапу цикла - составить план действий.

https://cutt.ly/ywqSQdSr


International Business : Role and Processes. Unit 3 - International Investment Process and Finance

 




















https://cutt.ly/jwqSnLZf

пятница, 26 мая 2023 г.

Discipline 4: Create a Cadence of Accountability

 


Accountability breeds response-ability.

Each team engages in a simple weekly process that highlights successes, analyzes failures, and course-corrects as necessary, creating the ultimate performance-management system.

The cadence of accountability is a rhythm of regular and frequent team meetings that focus on the Wildly Important Goal®. These meetings happen weekly, sometimes daily. They ideally last no more than 20 minutes. In that brief time, team members hold each other accountable for commitments made to move the score.

The secret to Discipline 4, in addition to the weekly cadence, are the commitments that team members create in the meeting. One by one, team members answer a simple question, “What are the one or two most important things I can do this week that will have the biggest impact on the scoreboard?” In the meeting, each team member reports first if they met last week’s commitments, second if the commitments move the lead or lag measures on the scoreboard, and finally which commitments they will make for the upcoming week.

People are more likely to commit to their own ideas than to orders from above. When individuals commit to fellow team members instead of only to the boss, the commitment goes beyond professional job performance to become a personal promise. When the team sees they are having a direct impact on the Wildly Important Goal, they know they are winning, and nothing drives morale and engagement more than winning.

Create a cadence of accountability


With Discipline 4, teams share accountability. Commitments are not only made between leaders and their teams; they are made between individuals on the teams. By keeping weekly commitments, team members influence the lead measure which in turn is predictive of success on the lag measure of the WIG®.

Where do you find people who are passionately committed to their work? You find them working for leaders who are passionately committed to them.

— Jim Huling, Co-author of The 4 Disciplines of Execution


Where execution actually happens

The fourth discipline is to create a cadence of accountability, a frequently recurring cycle of accounting for past performance and planning to move the score forward. Discipline 4 is where execution happens. Disciplines 1, 2, and 3 set up the game but until you apply Discipline 4, your team isn't in the game. 

This is the discipline that brings the team members together.

In Discipline 4, your team meets at least weekly in a WIG session. This meeting lasts no longer than 20 to 30 minutes, has a set agenda and goes quickly, establishing your weekly rhythm of accountability for driving progress toward the WIG.

Here's the three-part agenda for a WIG session and the kind of language you should be hearing in the session:

1. Account: Report on commitments.

"I committed to make a personal call to three customers who gave us lower scores. I did, and here's what I learned..."

2. Review the scoreboard: Learn from successes and failures. 

"Our lag measure is green, but we've got a challenge with one of our lead measures that just fell to yellow. Here's what happened..."

3. Plan: Clear the path and make new commitments.

"I'll meet with Bob on our numbers and come back next week with at least three ideas for helping us improve."

To prepare for the meeting, every team member thinks about the same question: "What are the one or two most important things I can do this week to impact the lead measures?"

The WIG session should move at a fast pace. The WIG session also gives the team the chance to process what they've learned. You should often ask each team member "What can I do this week to clear the path for you?"

Each commitment must meet two standards:

  1. The commitment must represent a specific deliverable.
  2. The commitment must influence the lead measure. 

If you simply tell your team what to do, they will learn little. What you ultimately want is for each member of your team to take personal ownership of the commitments they make. 

A Different Kind of Accountability

The accountability created in a WIG session is not organizational, it's personal. Instead of accountability to a broad outcome you can't influence, it's accountability to a weekly commitment that you yourself made and that is within your power to keep. When members of the team see their peers consistently following through on the commitments they make, they learn that the people they work with can be trusted to follow through. When this happens, performance improves dramatically. 

The WIG session encourages experimentation with fresh ideas. It engages everyone in problem-solving and promotes shared learning. 4DX produces results not from the exercise of authority, but from the fundamental desire of each individual team member to feel significant, to do work that matters and, ultimately, to win.

https://cutt.ly/awqOcWg6



четверг, 25 мая 2023 г.

For optimal productivity, be on break for 20-25% of the workday

 


Takeaway:

For optimal productivity, we should rest for around 20-30 minutes for every 90 minutes we work. This sounds like a lot, but three separate studies back up this amount of time.

The other day, reviewing research on how long our work breaks should be, I noticed a curious connection. Three separate studies indicated essentially the same thing: we should be on break for 20-25% of our day for optimal energy and productivity.

Two studies conducted in 2014 and 2021 by Desktime (a time tracking app) found that their most productive users were on break for this proportion of the day. The 2014 study found that their most productive users were on break for 17 minutes every 52 minutes they worked—in other words, 25% of the day, in other words. Mid-pandemic, in 2021, their most productive users were on break for an average of 26 minutes for every 112 minutes of work—19% of the day.

A third study found that our energy naturally moves in a similar rhythm throughout the day. Most of the day, we oscillate between periods of wakefulness and sleepiness. We typically experience around 20 to 30 minutes of tiredness for every 90-minute period of higher energy. That’s roughly 18-25% of the day that our body naturally wants to rest. 

Taken together, these studies seem to suggest that 20-25% of the day is the sweet spot for breaks—especially if you’re trying to optimize your productivity level or accommodate the natural rhythms of your body and mind. 

While this sounds like a lot of time, it’s not as crazy as it sounds. If you’ve tried the Pomodoro technique, you’ve already worked with this rhythm. With the technique, you focus on something for 25 minutes, then take a five-minute break. After the first break, you repeat the same rhythm three more times, taking an extended break after the fourth focus session—the official website recommends around 20 minutes for this longer break. This equals 25% of the day—more if you decide to take an even longer break at the end, as many do. 

Another way to look at these numbers: Being on break for 20% of an eight-hour day is equivalent to a one-hour lunch break, plus one 18-minute break in the morning and afternoon. 25% of the day is a one-hour lunch break, with another hour of breaks distributed throughout the day. That’s a good amount of time, but as I’ve written in the past, when we’re on break, our mind continues working—especially when we give it a chance to wander

Working with this knowledge, I’ve started to track how many minutes I focus for—and then just multiply that number by 25% to figure out how long to break for when I feel the need to—or when I can. The longer I work, the longer the break I get. 

Your mileage will vary, of course. But remember that 20-25% of the day seems to be the sweet spot for both energy and productivity.


Written by Chris Bailey

https://cutt.ly/LwqTsR7o